B
BeyondET
Guest
ummm.
Did I ever hang on a cross to save mankind?
NO.
So what are you talking about???
Pay him no mind he rambles on like a broken record.
ummm.
Did I ever hang on a cross to save mankind?
NO.
So what are you talking about???
Your playing a game of twister with people words. You take make joy in that don't you.
Exegesis requires that one know the history of a verse and how words were used BACK IN JESUS' day.
No need to know Koinè Greek
ummm.
Did I ever hang on a cross to save mankind?
NO.
So what are you talking about???
Where does it say this??
Where does it say that a person is condemned if they at one time had faith, then stopped believing?
John 3 says he who does not believe is condemned already.. It does not say one who believed, then stopped believing becomes condemned again.
Pay him no mind he rambles on like a broken record.
what does this have to do with what I said?
Of course you did not hang on the cross. The cross is your and my only hope... But I still do not get your question.
Dude, She made a statement, I asked he a question about her statement.
Again, Keep it up..
And you are now on report. We will let the mods handle this,
Keep what up homs
Thats right. The moment we believe, in that present moment, we are now saved.
Thanks BeyondET.
It's OK.
I know theology REALLY WELL.
Problem is, some don't want to know theology, the study of God.
They want to know something that was taught 1,500 years after Christianity was created by our LORD and SAVIOR, Jesus.
I've said many times that all those theologians that came before Calvin must have been really dumb not to see OSAS in the New Testament.
Jesus is our LORD and Savior. I wonder if people know what this means??
If He is NOT OUR LORD, He cannot be our SAVIOR.
Seems simple, doesn't it.
Well, to you and I it is, but some refuse it.
I have to trust God's goodness and mercy to save us based on our heart and not on our doctrine.
But this does frighten me a little, how some twist words around to suit their own beliefs.
How many examples do you want?
I've listed many.
Hebrews 6:4-6 - Says if a person could fall (lose salvation) which they can not in my opinion. they can not be resaved, period, it is not a passage about losing salvation, it is a passage dealing wiht returning to law. where salvation can be lost. It is an argument against that. If you can lose salvation. No law will save you again.
2 Peter 2:20-22 - Says a person who has recieved the word of truth, It never said they had faiht in it, or were saved, if they walk away, it will be worse for them. AMEN to that, Imagine having the word which could have saved you and you walked away from it.
Mathew 12:31-32 - Unpardonable sin, Which these men has just commited, (they attributed the work of the HS to satan) Jesus said they were in danger, even though the comited the sin, It means if we do not repent from our state of unbelief we will have no hope. but be condemned, Because all sin will be forgiven but one.
Mathew 19:28 - Sit on thrones? What do you mean?
Mathew 13:20-21 - Again, rcieved the word. But has no root (christ) that is why they walked away.. If you do not have christ as your root. you are not saved. So again, What is your point, this does not say a person lost salvation it says they never had it (no root)
So again, Where does it say a person can have faith, Be born again by God, given eternal life, The seal of the spirit. Justified sanctified, perfected, Adoped. Redeemed (I can go on and on) and lose all of those things?
You continue to ask if I'm trying to save myself.
I asked you if I ever hung on a cross to save myself.
You say NO.
Maybe you'll stop asking now.
Thanks BeyondET.
It's OK.
I know theology REALLY WELL.
Problem is, some don't want to know theology, the study of God.
They want to know something that was taught 1,500 years after Christianity was created by our LORD and SAVIOR, Jesus.
I've said many times that all those theologians that came before Calvin must have been really dumb not to see OSAS in the New Testament.
Jesus is our LORD and Savior. I wonder if people know what this means??
If He is NOT OUR LORD, He cannot be our SAVIOR.
Seems simple, doesn't it.
Well, to you and I it is, but some refuse it.
I have to trust God's goodness and mercy to save us based on our heart and not on our doctrine.
But this does frighten me a little, how some twist words around to suit their own beliefs.
Sorry but your understanding places responsibility for salvation on you and not wholly on Christ. You do not understand the Lordship of Christ confusing it with earthly understanding when Holy Spirit understanding is required.Thanks BeyondET.
It's OK.
I know theology REALLY WELL.
Problem is, some don't want to know theology, the study of God.
They want to know something that was taught 1,500 years after Christianity was created by our LORD and SAVIOR, Jesus.
I've said many times that all those theologians that came before Calvin must have been really dumb not to see OSAS in the New Testament.
Jesus is our LORD and Savior. I wonder if people know what this means??
If He is NOT OUR LORD, He cannot be our SAVIOR.
Seems simple, doesn't it.
Well, to you and I it is, but some refuse it.
I have to trust God's goodness and mercy to save us based on our heart and not on our doctrine.
But this does frighten me a little, how some twist words around to suit their own beliefs.
And will NOT perish and HAVE eternal life.![]()
Thanks BeyondET.
It's OK.
I know theology REALLY WELL.
Problem is, some don't want to know theology, the study of God.
They want to know something that was taught 1,500 years after Christianity was created by our LORD and SAVIOR, Jesus.
I've said many times that all those theologians that came before Calvin must have been really dumb not to see OSAS in the New Testament.
Jesus is our LORD and Savior. I wonder if people know what this means??
If He is NOT OUR LORD, He cannot be our SAVIOR.
Seems simple, doesn't it.
Well, to you and I it is, but some refuse it.
I have to trust God's goodness and mercy to save us based on our heart and not on our doctrine.
But this does frighten me a little, how some twist words around to suit their own beliefs.
Amen...scriptures bear this truth out.
True biblical belief is of the heart - not in the head or mind. God looks on the heart - man look on the outward appearance.
Getting "saved" is simple.
Romans 10:9-10 (NASB)
[SUP]9 [/SUP] that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;
[SUP]10 [/SUP] for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation.
The process is simple too.
1) we hear the message of Christ - the gospel of our salvation in Him
2) we believe the message from our hearts
3) we were sealed with the Holy Spirit ( Jesus said in John 14:16 that the Holy Spirit will be with us and in us forever - now was Jesus lying or is he like a "bait and switch" car salesman that has "fine print" which He doesn't talk about )
Ephesians 1:13 (NASB)
[SUP]13 [/SUP] In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, = 1) the gospel of your salvation—having also believed, = 2) you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, = 3)
you were sealed = aorist indicative tense / passive voice = a one time event in the past.
Passive voice = the sealing was not done by us but by an outside force - the Holy Spirit Himself.
Thanks BeyondET.
It's OK.
I know theology REALLY WELL.
Indeed sister, it's not that all complicated as some seem to think, a person can be the greatest theologian on the planet yet know nothing.