God's Commandment For Women Not To Speak In Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

proverbs35

Senior Member
Nov 10, 2012
827
239
43
Re: Husband beats wife on regular basis with wooden spoon

Modern women are horrible. I find it staggering that men don't beat sense in to women any more.
God corrected His people, and it was horrific with blood, violence and death. His people are His bride, it's a relationship, remember the wedding supper? If He didn't correct His people He wouldn't care about us.

A couple of bruises on your thigh and bum isn't anything in the same league as watching everyone around you get killed for disobedience.

Proverbs 13:24
He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.

Correction is needed for children, sure. What about women?



It's fascinating to see people react to this.

So you believe it's OK to physically strike ("spank") a child to correct them?
Why is it not OK for a man to physically strike a woman to correct..

Man found guilty of beating his wife on a regular basis for what he deemed disrespectful behavior. His wife videotaped one of the beatings and showed it to police. The video records the husband showing her the spoon and giving her a 'count of three to comply' with his demand of addressing him with a 'yes, sir' in front of the couple's children.He is also heard threatening to 'cast the demons out of her' next time she disobeyed him.

Dan Kirby Kopp beat wife with spoon | Daily Mail Online
 

notmyown

Senior Member
May 26, 2016
4,927
1,272
113
I'm pretty certain that most are objecting to "slapping some sense into a woman" as being the antidote.
slapping doesn't seem to be the prescribed method. must leave bruises. :(

in this country, intentionally bruising a child is a good way to ensure CPS fixes it so you're not a parent anymore.

thanks, and please take my word for it, when you have adult daughters, ideas like this will become even more offensive.

:)
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I'm pretty certain that most are objecting to "slapping some sense into a woman" as being the antidote.
Oh.

Haven't been reading along.

Well, I'd have to agree with that...

Slapping anybody around IS NOT THE SOLUTION!!

In fact, I'd say that would be part of the problem...
 
Nov 23, 2016
510
37
0
slapping doesn't seem to be the prescribed method. must leave bruises. :(

in this country, intentionally bruising a child is a good way to ensure CPS fixes it so you're not a parent anymore.

thanks, and please take my word for it, when you have adult daughters, ideas like this will become even more offensive.

:)

I've never been one to frown upon the counsel of one much older and experienced than I :)
 

proverbs35

Senior Member
Nov 10, 2012
827
239
43
Re: Husband said he killed wife because she talked too much

Modern women are horrible. I find it staggering that men don't beat sense in to women any more.
God corrected His people, and it was horrific with blood, violence and death. His people are His bride, it's a relationship, remember the wedding supper? If He didn't correct His people He wouldn't care about us.

A couple of bruises on your thigh and bum isn't anything in the same league as watching everyone around you get killed for disobedience.

Proverbs 13:24
He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.

Correction is needed for children, sure. What about women?


It's fascinating to see people react to this.

So you believe it's OK to physically strike ("spank") a child to correct them?
Why is it not OK for a man to physically strike a woman to correct..

An Alabama man admitted to the grizzly murder of his wife, three dogs, and parrot, telling authorities he was angry over a text message he saw on his wife’s phone. He also complained that his wife and the parrot talked too much, according to a note investigators found.

Paramedics saved Penton’s life despite a lethal dose of hydrocodone washed down with booze. A suicide note left by the suspect said he beat his wife before shooting her, then cut off her nose, according to testimony.

Officers also found three dead dogs and a dead parrot that had been shot. Penton allegedly killed the dogs because they had not been trained by his wife. In the note, he said he killed the parrot and his wife because they talked too much.

After being discharged from the hospital, investigators said Penton admitted to the killings, and that he was set off by a text message his wife sent to a friend, which said: “He’s only been home for a few minutes and he’s already talking crap.”

The husband claimed his wife “didn’t deserve this, but she wanted it.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/08/man-kills-wife-parrot-talking_n_5289489.html
 

notmyown

Senior Member
May 26, 2016
4,927
1,272
113

I've never been one to frown upon the counsel of one much older and experienced than I :)
'and a quiet old lady who was whispering, hush!' you wretch! ;) :p

anecdotally, my 29 yo son would never, ever raise a hand to a woman. so i don't think it's about age.
it's about Christ in us.
 

proverbs35

Senior Member
Nov 10, 2012
827
239
43
Re: Joyce Meyer's bodyguard killed his wife and sons so he could be with mistress

Modern women are horrible. I find it staggering that men don't beat sense in to women any more.
God corrected His people, and it was horrific with blood, violence and death. His people are His bride, it's a relationship, remember the wedding supper? If He didn't correct His people He wouldn't care about us.

A couple of bruises on your thigh and bum isn't anything in the same league as watching everyone around you get killed for disobedience.

Proverbs 13:24
He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.

Correction is needed for children, sure. What about women?


It's fascinating to see people react to this.

So you believe it's OK to physically strike ("spank") a child to correct them?
Why is it not OK for a man to physically strike a woman to correct..

Joyce Meyer’s former bodyguard slaughtered his wife and two sons, so he could be marry his mistress. Joyce Meyers paid him 6 figures, and he wanted to keep his salary. He knew that if he left his wife to marry another woman that he would probably lose his 6 figure salary job with that christian ministry. Therefore, he decided to slaughter his wife and kids and blame it on religious fanatics.

Chris Coleman had been abusive to his wife during the marriage. His wife was also aware of his infidelity. However, rather than flee with children to a place of safety, she chose to stay and pray. Too bad for her and her sons, Coleman's behavior didn't get better; he only got worse - much worse.

Court upholds life sentence for Joyce Meyer's bodyguard who strangled family to death | Daily Mail Online


download.jpg

Another seemingly happy family photo, but once again, looks can be so deceiving.

 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48
Tough or horrible? Feminism doesn't come from God, it comes from God's enemy, because of how much confusion and harm it brings.

How come there is never a 50 or 60 something topless jihad? This reminds of what Churchill is always blamed for saying, "If you are not a liberal in your twenties, you have no heart and if you are not a conservative in your thirties you have no brain" He never said that but whoever did should of upped it to forties.

There is a good reason that a women should not have authority over men or a fellowship of believers, sure they can teach as Pula said the younger women to love their husbands and how to raise children and teach children. Paul say that Eve was deceived, not my words Paul's and I've never hear anyone that knows the Greek to dispute this. Paul said it now what? He was inspired by the Holy Spirit, what does it mean? Look to the book of Acts and we see that Paul went to the synagogues to preach Christ. those synagogues were set up in the traditions of the Jews and the Law, women were unclean when it was their time of the month. The synagogues I seen in Israel were two story, so a women asking her husband a question was not in good taste, since they were on different floors. Some say that they on the same floor, but in different areas, either way it was not ideal for a women to ask questions of her husband during a Church meeting.

With that in mind, women also have hormonal issues monthly or during a gustation period. This is why it is not the best idea to have a women in charge or having authority over men, because there are times when their judgement are way to emotional. Now with men we are always dummies so no one takes us serious anyway, lol The women is to be our helpmate, not below us, bit beside us. I hear it said, "God did not take women from a foot bone that man should be over her or from the scull that she should be over man, but from the rib, that she should be beside him" Man needs a women to keep him in line, to help him make good decisions. Or women can be like some cultures where they seem as if they are submitted to the man, but in all reality they are running the show behind the seen, that's the world.

Let's really think about this, now in America men and women sit in the same area, I've been to Churches that take the Scripture literally and man sit on one side and women on the other. But if your Church is set up where men and women sit together, is it not distracting to others if the wife keeps asking question of her husband during the service? Of course it is, especially to the people around you. So Paul points out wives, but it is just as distracting if a man asks his wife, what is being said and I've seen it many times. Where the husband is a new convert and the wive is more mature in the faith and it is just as distracting for the husband to be asking question.

The reality is that everyone needs to shut up during the preaching of the word. Can women be elders, bishops, deacons sure if the can be the husband of one wife, that is one of the qualification. Can women teach in the Church yes they can, they can teach other women, the older should impart their wisdom to the younger and they can teach children and they may serve in the body in many other ministries. Can they teach men? Yes, they can teach a man the Gospel for salvation, should a women disciple a man, I do not see Scripture that says no, at the same time why put anyone in a situation of temptation.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
Reposted from another thread as it ends with why women are not to speak as a line of discernment on tongues without interpretation as not being of the Lord for why all believers, male and female, should not believe every spirit that comes over them but test the spirits and the tongues they bring for God's gift of tongues WILL come with interpretation.

The real problem is that Enow has learned a false understanding of the subject, and is teaching his false understanding as though it were true. His beliefs are so entrenched in his mind that he cannot comprehend the words of scripture.

He has claimed multiple times that

That is simply not true, and it directly contradicts the written scriptures:

1 Cor 14:
2) For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth [him]; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries..

Speaking in tongues is speaking TO GOD, it is NOT "for God to speak unto the people".
And once again, I am telling you that you took verse 2 out of context for what Paul was trying to say about the gift of prophesy as being the gift to seek if any one was being zealous for spiritual gift. From verse 1 is the topic and verse 2 onward is Paul explaining why prophesy is better by explaining why tongues is not because it is not a stand alone gift that it HAS to come with interpretation. YOU KEEP making an exception for tongues to be used without interpretation when that is YOU reading that kind of tongue into Paul's message by taking verse 2 out of context.

1 Corinthians 14:1 Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy.[SUP] 2 [/SUP]For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.[SUP] 3 [/SUP]But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.[SUP] 4 [/SUP]He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church.[SUP] 5 [/SUP]I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

That is Paul explaining why the gift of prophesy is better because tongues has to be interpreted for the church to receive edifying.

Get this... Paul continues to talk about that same kind of tongue referenced in verse 2 below.... as to why it is not nor will it ever be a stand alone gift as he explains tongues being done in the assembly.... including how you apply verse 28 to mean tongues can be done quietly when that is not what verse 28 is saying in keeping in line with any tongue being done as in heard in the assembly.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]6 [/SUP]Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine? 7And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped? [SUP]8 [/SUP]For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle? [SUP]9 [/SUP]So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air. [SUP]10 [/SUP]There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification. [SUP]11 [/SUP]Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto him that speaketh a barbarian, and he that speaketh shall be a barbarian unto me. [SUP]12 [/SUP]Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church. [SUP]13 [/SUP]Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret. [SUP]14 [/SUP]For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. [SUP]15 [/SUP]What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest? [SUP]17 [/SUP]For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.


So here is Paul saying that his own understanding is unfruitful because no one has interpreted his tongue yet and so he would pray for the interpretation to pray for the understanding to be truly edified as well as those around him.

Then Paul spoke some more in preferring prophesy over tongues.... and explained why tongues is not a stand alone gift for why prophesy is better.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]18 [/SUP]I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:[SUP] 19 [/SUP]Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.[SUP]

And then to prevent anyone from taking that verse the wrong way, he explained further what God's gift of tongues are for to explain again why the gift of prophesy is better because God's gift of tongues has to come with interpretation.

1 Corinthians 14:
20 [/SUP]Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men.[SUP] 21 [/SUP]In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord.

More proof ? Read on...as to why prophesy is better and when tongues is done, it is to be interpreted for edifying.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]22 [/SUP]Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe. [SUP]23[/SUP]If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad? [SUP]24 [/SUP]But if all prophesy, and there come in one that believeth not, or one unlearned, he is convinced of all, he is judged of all: [SUP]25 [/SUP]And thus are the secrets of his heart made manifest; and so falling down on his face he will worship God, and report that God is in you of a truth. [SUP]26 [/SUP]How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.

That last verse was not signifying tongues was doing all that but an example of things not being done in order & decency for the purpose of edifying. Then Paul gave instructions on the proper order of edifying one another by use of tongues.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]27 [/SUP]If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. [SUP]28 [/SUP]But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.

Now when you have believers standing up, speaking one at a time with two or three to have one other to interpret that tongue, and if someone stood up and spoke but there is no interpretation, that was Paul way of saying that he is a foreigner speaking out of turn for why there is no interpretation and that is why he is to keep SILENCE because what he is saying, he understands it as God does too. Silence is not alllowing him to talk to himself and to God, but explaining how he was speaking as not manifested by the Holy Spirit because he is speaking to himself knowing what he is saying, as God understands what he is saying too, BUT he is not really speaking to himself nor to God when he is to be in silence.

That is how you are to read verse 2... because that is God's gift of tongues being manifested as the speaker does not know what he is saying, thus he does not understand it, but God does... not that he is speaking to God because this is being done in the church, as one speaking in mysteries since there are no mysteries to God. That was Paul comparing the gift of tongues against the gift of prophesy as to why it is NOT a stand alone gift that it has to come with interpretation for the edifying of the church. At no time did paul switched topic to explaining why tongues by itself is so much cooler than prophesy. That is opposing himself for why he was saying to believers to seek the gift of prophesy because tongues is not a stand alone gift as his argument has been the same throughout that chpater.

Look at the order for prophesying as to be done one at a time by two or three and let another judge it; the same format for speaking in tongues.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]29 [/SUP]Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge. [SUP]30 [/SUP]If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace. [SUP]31 [/SUP]For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.

Paul goes on to explain what happens when someone may speak out of turn in this situation as well so that they may speak one by one so that all will learn.

Verse 28 is not about God's gift of tongues being spoken, but about when a foreigner speaks out of turn. If you really believed it was about the Holy Spirit praying in tongues, then who is Paul to give such an instruction for the Holy Spirit to be in silence? If tongues were to be used for prayer language by the Holy Spirit at all... then that would be the time for Paul to say that when tongues comes without interpretation, it is prayer time for the Holy Spirit, BUT he did not say that.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]32 [/SUP]And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. [SUP]33 [/SUP]For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.

So at no tiime will the Holy Spirit be confusing by switching from speaking unto the people mode to speaking unto God mode as if speaking unto God mode has to be done in a secet language, thus not edifying to the tongue speaker at all.

And to read that chapter properly... you have to read the precedent in 1 Corinthians 12:4-11 for what any manifestations of the gifts are to do in the assembly... to profit the body withal... and there is NO PLAIN TEACHING NOR REPORTED PRACTICE of tongues as a PRAYER LANGUAGE anywhere in the New Testament WITHOUT YOU reading YOUR tongues without interpretation INTO the scripture.

1 Corinthians 12:[SUP]4 [/SUP]Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. [SUP]5 [/SUP]And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.

[SUP]7 [/SUP]But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.

[SUP]8 [/SUP]For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
[SUP]9 [/SUP]To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit;
[SUP]10 [/SUP]To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:
[SUP]11 [/SUP]But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.
[SUP]12 [/SUP]For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.
[SUP]13 [/SUP]For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

[SUP]14 [/SUP]For the body is not one member, but many.


And if tongues is for God to speak to the people " in their native tongue", why does it need to be interpreted at all?
In Acts 2nd chapter God's gift of tongues was used in ministry outreach as prophesied....in the assembly, instructions are given for why tongues would be manifested as it WILL come with interpretation to profit the body withal.

And he has specifically exhorted people to NOT seek the "gift" of tongues, when the Bible explicitly states:

1 Cor 14:
5) I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

1 Cor 14:
39) Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.

On this topic (and his views on women's role in the church, but that's for another thread) Enow is a dangerous man, trying to persuade people AWAY from the truth. I am convinced he does this in ignorance, but he refuses to "see the light", or the scriptures.
Paul said it. It is plain to read. Believers rationalize it as being something done only because of culture while ignoring it as a commandment of the Lord as we continue reading.

1 Corinthians 14:[SUP]34[/SUP]Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.[SUP] 35 [/SUP]And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.[SUP]36 [/SUP]What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only?[SUP]37 [/SUP]If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.[SUP] 38 [/SUP]But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

Now a repeat to covet the gift of prophesy over all spiritual gifts but not to forbid tongues when it does come as it will come with interpretation for everything to be done in decency and order.

1 Corinthians 14:.[SUP]39 [/SUP]Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.[SUP]40 [/SUP]Let all things be done decently and in order.

That means the Holy Spirit will not break God's commandment to manifest tongues in women nor the gift of prophesy in women in the assembly.

That means tongues can be forbidden when coming from a woman and when there is no interpretation, it is a foreigner speaking out of turn which is why he is made to be silent in the assembly because that is not the Holy Spirit manifesting tongues when God's gift of tongues WILL come with interpretation.

This is why believers are not to believe every spirit but test them and the tongues these spirits bring. 1 John 4:1-7
 
Nov 23, 2016
510
37
0
'and a quiet old lady who was whispering, hush!' you wretch! ;) :p

anecdotally, my 29 yo son would never, ever raise a hand to a woman. so i don't think it's about age.
it's about Christ in us.
Exactly ... and Amen ! Annnnd ... you never did learn how to accept a compliment :cool: .. lol
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,489
13,797
113
... There is a good reason that a women should not have authority over men or a fellowship of believers, sure they can teach as Pula said the younger women to love their husbands and how to raise children and teach children. Paul say that Eve was deceived, not my words Paul's and I've never hear anyone that knows the Greek to dispute this. Paul said it now what? He was inspired by the Holy Spirit, what does it mean?
A little contextual knowledge goes a long way. Timothy ministered in an area where pagan beliefs were taught; one of which was that Eve had secret knowledge and was formed first. Paul's words directly counter this belief. To take one statement about one woman and apply it to all women everywhere is silly, especially if you disregard the cultural context to which it was written. It's precisely this kind of thinking that can lead to misogyny.

Look to the book of Acts and we see that Paul went to the synagogues to preach Christ. those synagogues were set up in the traditions of the Jews and the Law, women were unclean when it was their time of the month. The synagogues I seen in Israel were two story, so a women asking her husband a question was not in good taste, since they were on different floors. Some say that they on the same floor, but in different areas, either way it was not ideal for a women to ask questions of her husband during a Church meeting.
The architectural arrangement of a synagogue has no didactic bearing on ecclesial practice within the early Christian assembly. It certainly has no bearing on 21st century Christian practice.

With that in mind, women also have hormonal issues monthly or during a gustation period. This is why it is not the best idea to have a women in charge or having authority over men, because there are times when their judgement are way to emotional.
I used to think we just disagreed on this matter. Now I would question your understanding of and respect for women in general. In your statement I see prejudice and ignorance.

Let's really think about this, now in America men and women sit in the same area, I've been to Churches that take the Scripture literally and man sit on one side and women on the other. But if your Church is set up where men and women sit together, is it not distracting to others if the wife keeps asking question of her husband during the service? Of course it is, especially to the people around you.
What scripture is that? I'm not familiar with a verse that recommends such. As to asking questions, a culture in which women were not formally educated would more likely lead to this situation. Is it no less distracting when a child asks their parent a question during the service? How about a newcomer? By all means, encourage people to listen to the message, but make space for questions as well, lest the learning be truncated by misunderstanding, confusion, or simple ignorance.

Recognize also that many preachers are not the best speakers, or may use unfamiliar words. I have experienced frustration when a speaker is unclear on a word, phrase, or concept, and the remainder of the message is lost because my mind is processing the uncertainty.

The reality is that everyone needs to shut up during the preaching of the word. Can women be elders, bishops, deacons sure if the can be the husband of one wife, that is one of the qualification.
I'd encourage you to read Angela53510's exegesis of this passage. If Paul's intention were to address polygamy, it is incorrect to take that restriction and broaden it to mean that women could not be officials in the assembly.

Overall, I notice that complementarians tend to take a statement which could have been written with any of several things in Paul's mind to always mean that he had distinct roles in mind. It's like how the media twists the words of leaders... if Trump says, "I like China" then the pundits declare with great certainty that he is blatantly and intentionally ignoring their human rights violations. He might simply be saying that he has met Chinese who are pleasant, or he'd like to visit parts of the country, or something else. Where there is uncertainty or disagreement, it is helpful to approach Paul's words as though he "may have" been saying such and such. More division is caused by dogmatism than by careful investigation. :)
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
You're 52. And you don't think there's a problem with the relationship between men and women?

Interesting.
It would be interesting to know where you live.
Really.

So why do you think no one wants to get married these days?
Why do you think there are so many divorces?

Because everything is just fine?
I didn't say there was no issue there.

Of course there's an issue there, but that is not THE issue. Thus my point which you've clearly missed.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I didn't say there was no issue there.

Of course there's an issue there, but that is not THE issue. Thus my point which you've clearly missed.
I apologize P4T

I did miss your point.

I wasn't reading along and maybe shouldn't have gotten involved...
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
I find it staggering that some people still keep trying to apply that comment to today's culture.

​ Well the important thing is we women have Enow's blessing to post in the forums. rofl
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Modern women are horrible. I find it staggering that men don't beat sense in to women any more.
Odd,I was thinking the same of some modern men. They need that slap their momma never gave them.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
The only commandment is they are not permitted to speak while watching sports on TV

​Hey,how can we yell for our team if we cant speak?! So not fair!
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
​ Well the important thing is we women have Enow's blessing to post in the forums. rofl
I used the OP as a line of discernment about how the Holy Spirit would not manifest tongues without interpretation as many women are using that kind of tongue as a prayer language... even in the assembly.

Isaiah 8:[SUP]19 [/SUP]And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?

Paul made a reference to tongues without interpretation without saying so, but this relations was in regards to spiritual gifts as cited in verse 1, but the article quoted below proves pagans' use of such supernatural tongue before Pentecost.

1 Corinthians 12:1Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant.[SUP]2 [/SUP]Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led.

Which is why believers are to NOT believe every spirit but test them and the tongues these spirits bring because it can be found in the world where it is just vain and profane babbling.

1 John 4:1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.[SUP] 2 [/SUP]Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:[SUP]3 [/SUP]And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.[SUP]4 [/SUP]Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.[SUP]5 [/SUP]They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.[SUP]6 [/SUP]We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.[SUP]7 [/SUP]Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.

Disclaimer: I am not endorsing everything at this site. This is referenced for the evidence that there is a supernatural tongue that is found in the world that is NOT God's gift of tongues which His gift is for speaking unto the people.

The Pagan Origins of Modern “Speaking in Tongues” | Doctrine Unites!

Yesterday, during our discussion of the phenomenon of speaking in tongues in my modular (intensive) course on the Holy Spirit, one of my students, a Vietnamese, related his experience as a Buddhist youth in his village. An uncle would visit their house and then start babbling unintelligible words and sounds in a trance. But when their dog started barking, he would fall asleep as his head would fall back, and then be silent. Then when the dog stopped barking, he would wake up and then point to various things in their house telling them that those things have evil spirits in them.
His story reminded me of the fact that unintelligible babbling known as “speaking in tongues” in the modern Pentecostal movement is widely practiced in cults and even in non-Christian and pagan religions. Richard Ganz, in 20 Controversies that Almost Killed a Church (p 212) says that this kind of babbling is practiced by Mormons, The Way International, Hindus, Muslims and many others.


But this practice is not only a recent phenomenon, but was common in pagan worship long before Christ came. Robert G. Gromacki, in The Modern Tongues Movement (pp 5-10), documents the history of “speaking in tongues” in antiquity. Some of these ecstatic babbling were reported in the “Report of Wenamon” (about 1100 BC), Plato’s Dialogues (5th century BC), and Virgil’s Aeneid (1st century BC). The Graeco-Roman mystery religions before and after the Christian era most probably practiced these babbling utterances.


Gromacki also documents this phenomenon in modern times among Muslims, Buddhists, and Eskimos. Worship rituals of Eskimos are an attempt to contact the spirit-world, and “are characterized by drum beating, singing, dancing, and nudity.” He cites a book by another author who observed an Eskimo ritual:
Suddenly one of the men, Krisuk, went out of his head. Unable to contain himself to the regular rhythm of the service he leapt to his feet crying like a raven and howling like a wolf. In ecstasy he and the girl, Ivaloo, began to yell in a tongue I could not understand… Certainly it was not the usual Eskimo language… and if there is such a thing as speaking in tongues I heard it then.

What well-known modern “revivals” does this account remind you of?
For an explanation of Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 14:21-22:
In the Law it is written, “By people of strange tongues and by the lips of foreigners will I speak to this people, and even then they will not listen to me, says the Lord.” Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers.



Now.. do I have just cause to say that God's gift of tongues is for speaking unto the people whereas when done in the assembly, it WILL come with interpretation or it is NOT being manifested by the Holy Spirit?

When believers testify of feeling what they assume was the Holy Spirit coming over them later on in life after they had been saved in bringing this tongue without interpretation that this is them ignoring the apostle John's warning not to believe every spirit, but test them?

There is a supernatural tongue that had existed in the world as confirmed by the Bible in Isaiah 8:19 that is just vain & profane babbling. It not only exists in the occult but in pagan religions in communing with spirits as well, as evident by the article.

1 Thessalonians 5:[SUP]21 [/SUP]Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.[SUP]22 [/SUP]Abstain from all appearance of evil.

God would not mimic that kind of supernatural tongue in the world since He is calling sinners to depart from their practices and from those spirits and from their tongues to a personal reconciled relationship with God through Jesus Christ.

 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
I would count you also in the same class, since you have consistently attempted to bait me by implying that I'm upset or crying. This isn't 5th grade any more. I suspect that you were raised by a single mother, since you have defended women at every opportunity like you feel it's somehow honorable, and are offended by the subject of modern women and fatherless children.


​And this is why people hate the BDF and don't come here anymore. Outrageous, comments like the ones you are making. My grandmother raised six boys,on her own,because her husband left HER. This happened to another woman within my family,her husband was cheating on her with the young secretary he worked with and left her. So Id appreciate you'd take your personal issues and get help for them because you seem to think that women are bad because of something in your past. When several of us could point to the same faults in fathers that took off and left mothers to raise children while they got their jollies off on some other woman.
 

Zen

Senior Member
Sep 11, 2015
752
16
18
​And this is why people hate the BDF and don't come here anymore.
No it's because of bullies like sevenseas and Angela. I got given rep in this thread for 'standing up to her' because 'she is one of the biggest bullies on the site'. Lol.

My grandmother raised six boys,on her own,because her husband left HER.
And if her husband believed Lord Jesus then he would only do that if she was an adulterer, and he would have stuck around. So either she was an adulteress or her husband was not following scripture. If he wasn't following scripture why are you blaming me for saying women should obey their husbands when it's actual scripture?

This happened to another woman within my family,her husband was cheating on her with the young secretary he worked with and left her.
So an adulterer caused your family harm, it wasn't women being under authority of men which caused the harm.

So Id appreciate you'd take your personal issues and get help for them because you seem to think that women are bad because of something in your past.
No, this sounds like projecting.

When several of us could point to the same faults in fathers that took off and left mothers to raise children while they got their jollies off on some other woman.
Men not following scripture hurt your family so you believe that modern men are horrible? You're entitled to any of your opinions, I'm not going to judge you.

Maybe this should serve as a reminder to all of us not to marry people who don't take God's Word seriously.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
It's OK, I wouldn't be surprised if you did.

1 Corinthians 11:3
But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Do you think this scripture is stupid? Or do you think it's wise?

Do you believe that women should be subject to the authority of men?

Woman's suffrage has caused all types of problems.




Yeah its when women got the vote that it all went to crap. :rolleyes: