Not according to the context forced upon it by the charismatic Pentecostal crowd.what its talking about is if you drink it unaware and are accidentally bitten by a snake. It is written you shall not tempt God.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Not according to the context forced upon it by the charismatic Pentecostal crowd.what its talking about is if you drink it unaware and are accidentally bitten by a snake. It is written you shall not tempt God.
Not according to the context forced upon it by the charismatic Pentecostal crowd.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
How about Mark 16:18? drinking poison and playing with serpents is not wise.
You are in great error.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Far from the truth as speaking in tongues is a sign for unsaved Jews. The corrupted tongues of the Pentecostal charismatic churches is nothing like the apostolic churches.You don't have to speak in tongues to be born again, this teaching diminishes what is true Pentecost. However you will speak in tongues as the evidence of being baptized in the Holy Spirit the bible is clear on that point.
If you do I will instruct you on the proper exegesis of the scriptures. Think you can stand the truth? Boy I'm tempted to tie this to the other thread on seducing spirits but that would create a very volatile situation.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Which means what? My God protects me everyday from unseen perils both physical and Spiritual. There is no need of sign gifts unless there are unsaved Jews present.It is Written, you shall not tempt the LORD your GOD (Deut 6:16, Matt 4:7)
The power of the indwelling Holy Spirit protects believers from real unprovoked dangers in accordance with the will of God. This is no error.
Acts 28:3 And when Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks, and laid them on the fire, there came a viper out of the heat, and fastened on his hand. 4And when the barbarians saw the venomous beast hang on his hand, they said among themselves, No doubt this man is a murderer, whom, though he hath escaped the sea, yet vengeance suffereth not to live. 5And he shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm. 6Howbeit they looked when he should have swollen, or fallen down dead suddenly: but after they had looked a great while, and saw no harm come to him, they changed their minds, and said that he was a god.
Are you really going to profess that you believe Jesus was literally telling the apostles to amass tangible faith equal to a grain of mustard seed? Can you not see that Jesus is comparing their lack of and inability to have faith sufficient to His?Close your eyes, take a deep breath, and realize that I am not attacking you. (I'll confess that I have in times past but am not now). I am just sincerely trying to help you see where you have gone wrong.
See, the issue is not that my interpretation of scripture is not the same as yours. That's ok, we can agree to disagree.
The issue is that you repeatedly and continuously hold to interpretations that are CLEARLY contrary to God's word. You can't agree to disagree with God. Between your word and His, God wins. Every single time. And that doesn't get shown any clearer than this :
God's words:
Mark 11:23
Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them.
Matthew 12:21
Jesus replied, "Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and it will be done.
Your words:
You are not going to move mountains with your faith.
Roger
This is where you fail, Roger. You hold God's word in contempt. You are DIRECTLY opposed to it.
Now, when you are able to let go of human understanding (you're not going to move mountains with your faith), and accept that however unlikely it sounds, with God you will move mountains with your faith, then you will begin to understand and accept spiritual concepts that over-ride the human equivalents (ie. you WILL move mountains with your faith, contrary to the human understanding that says it's impossible).
Until you see just how badly opposed to God's actual word you are, you will be nothing but an unreliable clanging cymbal in relation to ALL scripture.
Let go of your human understanding Roger. It is only then that you will have an understanding that surpasses all others.
And I offer that in all sincerity, brother.
Far from the truth as speaking in tongues is a sign for unsaved Jews. The corrupted tongues of the Pentecostal charismatic churches is nothing like the apostolic churches.
The three sign gifts ended with the completion of the NT. The remaining gifts continue but are obscured by the uncleanness of the modern church.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
If you are stating that someone who can not speak in tongues is not born again. I have to tellyou that you teach a false doctrine! In the consequence you say all non pentecostal and non charismatic christians are not born again.
Means are not saved and not christians.
Sorry this is a false doctrine.
Poor Calvin, Knox, Luther, Simons, they all are lost! Only those sects like Mormons, and new apostolic Believers are saved because the are also getting The gift of healing, prophecie and speaking in tongues.
You realy believe that?
If you are stating that someone who can not speak in tongues is not born again. I have to tellyou that you teach a false doctrine! In the consequence you say all non pentecostal and non charismatic christians are not born again.
Means are not saved and not christians.
Sorry this is a false doctrine.
Poor Calvin, Knox, Luther, Simons, they all are lost! Only those sects like Mormons, and new apostolic Believers are saved because the are also getting The gift of healing, prophecie and speaking in tongues.
You realy believe that?
Yes, unless they had the baptism of the Spirit and kept the faith they were just religious people and Christ was never in them! You have to dump all that religious garbage into the trash can and see what the text actually says and not unregenerated mens opinion about it. Obviously religious people who have never received Jesus Christ by the Spirit baptism of fire are gonna come up with some religious doctrine telling you that you already have it when you become religious and get baptized at their church, and that the sings and wonders were only for that time. Or that you have to have an enormous amount of faith for them to take place. Go back and read my post 299# and see if that is what the bible is saying for yourself. Many are called, but few are chosen. Thats why we have so many religious people in this world.
About 5% or so of Pentecostals are in the Oneness Pentecostal movement. This movement broke off from the larger Pentecostal movement because they believe that Jesus is the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and because they believe in saying 'in Jesus name' (or something similar) instead of the Matthew 28 baptismal formula. These are the only Pentecostals I know of that believe that if someone does not speak in tongues, he is not saved.
I don't think I have ever heard of any Charismatics who believe that someone who does not speak in tongues is not saved.
You don't have to speak in tongues to be born again, this teaching diminishes what is true Pentecost. However you will speak in tongues as the evidence of being baptized in the Holy Spirit the bible is clear on that point.
There is one baptism in the Holy Spirit, Matt 3: 11. Acts 1: 4--5. Acts 2: 4. But many fillings, Acts 4: 31. Eph 5: 18. The Greek means, Keep on being filled with the Spirit.
The baptism in the Holy Spirit, is a separate experience to the rebirth, Acts 8: 14--17. Acts 9: 6--17. Acts 19: 2--6.
The Holy Spirit baptises us into the body of Christ, 1 Cor 12: 13. And Jesus baptises us with the Holy Ghost. Matt 3: 11.
Brother, i know i am born again. The Holy spirit says it to my Spirit.
The Problem with your theory is, i speak for Germany. According what you believe: Before pentecostal movement came in 1907 to germany no christian exist in Germany. Because this doctrine nowhere was taught. Sorry man, this is simply not true! Yes we have many nominall christians and i was before i became a follower of Christ.
But your doctrine is a big missinterpreting of the scripture.
Tongues are a sign to those who do not believe. (no faith in God ) Prophecy the revealed will of God for those who do believe according to the faith of Christ.
God is no longer bringing new prophecy. What we had in part up till the last book ( Revelation) today we have the whole perfect will of God.It is sealed up till the end of time.
It is a evil generation (the generation of Adam) that does seek after a sign or any manner..
Tongues are not a work we can do to get our saved or witness we are. .Peter spoke in his native tongue. God interpreted it into the language know. It was prophecy, the gospel....3000 men from many different nation received eternal life.
Tongues is the work God does to give the person His understandings . It is not attributed to Peter or any man.
1Co 14:22 Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them “that believe”, but “to them that believe not”: but “prophesying serveth not for them that believe not , but “for them which believe”.