Hey, I was attacking him because Bradc said we are born guilty of Adam's sin.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, if you know what I mean..lol..
Hey, I was attacking him because Bradc said we are born guilty of Adam's sin.
You can't selectively have compassion for "some" sinners, Mitspa. You either have compassion for ALL sinners, or NO compassion for ANY of them.
Well, I am a sinner and will remain so until Christ changes me at the 2nd coming. I stand justifed by faith by the doing and dying of Christ and nothing else.
1] The Sabbath as linked to the gospel, not the law
or
2] Why the Papacy is anti-Christ.
What topic do you wish me to go for....Maybe we will agree this time?
1] The Sabbath as linked to the gospel, not the law
2] Why the Papacy is anti-Christ.
This will primarily be based on Hebrews chapter 4
This one will be a bit heavy, but basically I will use one verse as a springboard:
“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."
Which one?
Why the papacy is anti-christ..
Yes ...do the Sabbath one.... I gota hear this ...lol
1] We aren't born guilty of Adam's sin: We are born condemned because we share Adam's life. Big difference. Only when we sin Adam's sin to we become guilty of his sin.
2] Christ didn't crucify himself: Adam's life, which we all share, died with Christ as the son of man. That shared life included "the law of sin" which ever man is born with....
The sin of Adam is not just in the members or cells of the body but within the heart of man. Out of the heart proceed these things... all the works of the flesh. .
Well your claim is if Christ took upon Himself our sin in the flesh that would make Him a sinner. But now you are claiming this happened only at the cross. Well, according to your own theology, that still would make Him as sinner. See how confused your theology is?
hey RobertH
When Aaron has finished making atonement for the Most Holy Place, the tent of meeting and the altar, he shall bring forward the live goat. He is to lay both hands on the head of the live goat and confess over it all the wickedness and rebellion of the Israelites—all their sins—and put them on the goat’s head. He shall send the goat away into the wilderness in the care of someone appointed for the task. The goat will carry on itself all their sins to a remote place; and the man shall release it in the wilderness.
(Leviticus 16:20-22)
was this goat (the "scapegoat") a sinner?
yet it carried all the sins of Israel.
do you understand?
did you see this?
For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin,
so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
(1 Corinthians 5:21)
You can't establish truth by first going to the unclear, vague verses. You must first go to the clear, unmistakable verses then you'll know better how to interpret the ones not as clear.
Here's what it means: God the Father made Christ as the son of man to be sin, who as God the Son knew no sin....
I'm sticking with the clear context of Rom 6:6/7:4....Otherwise, no reply.....
i agree that it is easier to hold on to bad soteriology when you ignore whatever conflicts with it.
God the Father made Christ as the son of man to be sin, who as God the Son knew no sin....
i was wondering, do you think this is unclear or vague?
You know that he appeared in order to take away sins,
and in him there is no sin.
(1 John 3:5)
Here's the NASB*:hmm, where can one find precedent for such a thing in scripture?