He became sin...???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
You can't selectively have compassion for "some" sinners, Mitspa. You either have compassion for ALL sinners, or NO compassion for ANY of them.

Well, I am a sinner and will remain so until Christ changes me at the 2nd coming. I stand justifed by faith by the doing and dying of Christ and nothing else.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,925
9,673
113
Well, I am a sinner and will remain so until Christ changes me at the 2nd coming. I stand justifed by faith by the doing and dying of Christ and nothing else.
We are ALL sinners, Robert. Even Mitspa is a sinner. :) And we will remain sinners until Jesus changes us..
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
1] The Sabbath as linked to the gospel, not the law
This will primarily be based on Hebrews chapter 4

2] Why the Papacy is anti-Christ.
This one will be a bit heavy, but basically I will use one verse as a springboard:

“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."

Which one?
 
M

Mitspa

Guest


This will primarily be based on Hebrews chapter 4



This one will be a bit heavy, but basically I will use one verse as a springboard:

“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me."

Which one?
Yes ...do the Sabbath one.... I gota hear this ...lol
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
Why the papacy is anti-christ..
So you want me to debate the papacy?

The simple answer is the believer doesn't need an earthly priest to represent him/her before God. Christ is our High Priest. To get between the believer and Christ is to be anti-Christ. Anti-Christ doesn't just mean against Christ, but to stand in the place of Christ.

"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, He is Jesus Christ himself, hidden under the veil of flesh.” Catholic National July 1895


“We hold upon this earth the place of Almighty God” Pope Leo XIII Encyclical Letter of June 20,1894
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
Yes ...do the Sabbath one.... I gota hear this ...lol
Well, I've already started on the Papacy.

But...if you think that it's going to be a debate between Sunday keeping Christians and Saturday keeping Christians, you'll be disappointed because we should worship Jesus everyday.....Besides the majority of Christians worshiping on Sunday are resting in Christ, where many who keep the Sabbath, according to the law, are not resting in Christ. Who will be saved in then end? The one resting in Christ....

And if you think I'm going to tell you keep the Sabbath or you'll be lost, you'll be disappointed. Why? If I said that I would be placing you under law and salvation by works.

Still interested?

But first, what do you think of the Pope and the Papacy?

I for one am a Protestant. That means I protest Roman and the Pope....
 
Last edited:
B

BradC

Guest



1] We aren't born guilty of Adam's sin: We are born condemned because we share Adam's life. Big difference. Only when we sin Adam's sin to we become guilty of his sin.

2] Christ didn't crucify himself: Adam's life, which we all share, died with Christ as the son of man. That shared life included "the law of sin" which ever man is born with....
The sin of Adam is not just in the members or cells of the body but within the heart of man. Out of the heart proceed these things... all the works of the flesh. That is why the heart is deceitful and desperately wicked above all things. The sin of Adam was not just transferred to the body of flesh but it became the heart of the flesh making the head sick and the heart faint so that man's mind would also correspond with the flesh. It was covered with wounds, bruises and putrifying soars. So man with Adam's sin is completely depraved without any ability to do a single good thing that would be acceptable to a holy God. There is non that doeth good, no not one. Do we want to impute Adam's sin to Christ at birth, it we do we must also include the heart and mind as well and not just the members of his body. The cross is a judicial act but it was on the just for the unjust, it was an act of cruel death on the blameless and spotless one for the wicked and guilty representative of every man born.
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
The sin of Adam is not just in the members or cells of the body but within the heart of man. Out of the heart proceed these things... all the works of the flesh. .
But that's my own personal sins (transgressions). I am not guilty of Adam's sin unless I repeat it.

The problem is I was born with Adam's fallen nature and since I was born without God's Spirit in control of my mind and heart I naturally sin.

Christ was born spiritually alive. Meaning He was born with the Spirit in control of our fallen nature that He assumed at the incarnation.

As far as I'm concerned this topic is over, unless you stick to the context of Romans 6:6.....
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
38,120
13,681
113
Well your claim is if Christ took upon Himself our sin in the flesh that would make Him a sinner. But now you are claiming this happened only at the cross. Well, according to your own theology, that still would make Him as sinner. See how confused your theology is?
did you see this?

hey RobertH


When Aaron has finished making atonement for the Most Holy Place, the tent of meeting and the altar, he shall bring forward the live goat. He is to lay both hands on the head of the live goat and confess over it all the wickedness and rebellion of the Israelites—all their sins—and put them on the goat’s head. He shall send the goat away into the wilderness in the care of someone appointed for the task. The goat will carry on itself all their sins to a remote place; and the man shall release it in the wilderness.
(Leviticus 16:20-22)

was this goat (the "scapegoat") a sinner?
yet it carried all the sins of Israel.

do you understand?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
38,120
13,681
113
in re:



For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin,
so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

(1 Corinthians 5:21)
You can't establish truth by first going to the unclear, vague verses. You must first go to the clear, unmistakable verses then you'll know better how to interpret the ones not as clear.


i don't consider 1 Corinthians 5:21 to be "unclear" or "vague"

Here's what it means: God the Father made Christ as the son of man to be sin, who as God the Son knew no sin....

oh, i see you don't either .. ? but the wage of sin is death - did the Son of Man die for His own sin (as though He had sin) or for the sins of others? (in light of a clear and not at all vague scripture)

He is the propitiation for our sins,
and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

(1 John 2:2)

i was wondering, do you think this is unclear or vague?

You know that he appeared in order to take away sins,
and in him there is no sin.

(1 John 3:5)


 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
38,120
13,681
113
I'm sticking with the clear context of Rom 6:6/7:4....Otherwise, no reply.....

i agree that it is easier to hold on to bad soteriology when you ignore whatever conflicts with it.
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
i agree that it is easier to hold on to bad soteriology when you ignore whatever conflicts with it.
Here's the NASB*:

"
Our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with...."

Let's be honest with the above quote:

What is "our old self" according to the context?

Answer: "our old self" = "our body of sin"

Now what does "our body of sin" mean? For this I must move to Romans chapter 7 where Paul states the following:

Rom 7:23-24 "I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of
the law of sin which is in my members
.

"Our body of sin" = "our old self" = "the law of sin...in my members"

So "in Christ" (Christ as the son of man) "our old self", which contained "the law of sin" (our bent, our self-love), was (past tense) crucified with Christ so that "our body of sin" might forever die.

* https://www.biblegateway.com/version...rd-Bible-NASB/
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
38,120
13,681
113
God the Father made Christ as the son of man to be sin, who as God the Son knew no sin....
hmm, where can one find precedent for such a thing in scripture?

o i know, propitiation!
the sacrifices made under the law given through Moses!

guess what - Leviticus is pretty well relevant. and do you know what else? spotless animals without defect were chosen to atone for sin. sin was transferred to them by the priest when they were sacrificed.
an extraordinary example of this is given in Leviticus 16, where upon a single creature the entirety of Israel's sin was placed.

clear?
the creature was not a sinner. the creature was an atonement and propitiation.
are you familiar with passover?
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
i was wondering, do you think this is unclear or vague?

You know that he appeared in order to take away sins,
and in him there is no sin.

(1 John 3:5)


Here's the NASB*:

"
Our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with...."

Let's be honest with the above quote:

What is "our old self" according to the context?

Answer: "our old self" = "our body of sin"

Now what does "our body of sin" mean? For this I must move to Romans chapter 7 where Paul states the following:

Rom 7:23-24 "I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of
the law of sin which is in my members
.

"Our body of sin" = "our old self" = "the law of sin...in my members"

So "in Christ" (Christ as the son of man) "our old self", which contained "the law of sin" (our bent, our self-love), was (past tense) crucified with Christ so that "our body of sin" might forever die.

* https://www.biblegateway.com/version...rd-Bible-NASB/
 
Oct 3, 2015
1,266
7
0
hmm, where can one find precedent for such a thing in scripture?
Here's the NASB*:

"
Our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with...."

Let's be honest with the above quote:

What is "our old self" according to the context?

Answer: "our old self" = "our body of sin"

Now what does "our body of sin" mean? For this I must move to Romans chapter 7 where Paul states the following:

Rom 7:23-24 "I see a different law in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of
the law of sin which is in my members
.

"Our body of sin" = "our old self" = "the law of sin...in my members"

So "in Christ" (Christ as the son of man) "our old self", which contained "the law of sin" (our bent, our self-love), was (past tense) crucified with Christ so that "our body of sin" might forever die.

* https://www.biblegateway.com/version...rd-Bible-NASB/