I wanted to make this post to yourself @
Magenta - it seems wise to do that in this given circumstance.
When I first saw the OP that this OP represents I was immediately reminded of a young lady I knew through Ministry. Her birth was marked by an eventful day - and not least for her somewhat large sibling cohort who were waiting to welcome their new 'brother' into the fold of 'brothers all'.
So I took them for a Pizza and lavished upon them a feast they never did forget - and that was of course because I heartily approved of their boyishness and misplaced belief that 'another brother' was due anytime soon. I did in fact believe their mother who told me one time that God had promised her.a daughter - I knew that she was telling me the truth and so I took the boys aside whilst Mom and Dad entered the temple of Modernity to occasion the birth of their daughter. That child was brought to my memory when I saw this self proposed picture of the young lady in the OP.
The comment at
#19 is a stark way of imbibing a proper sense of how we arrived at this 'madness' or a kind of madness - and especially when the claimed theatre is wilfully or circumstantially prescribed into a national claim to a Nation. In the poster's case that is of course entirely set in a claimed England. Whereas, in England to be presented in a photographic way to an implied claim that the image may be recent and then to utilise formal language (so called British English) along with the Middle Class sense of reasonable and proportionate response along with a sense of 'party' is in truth a rank deception. It was that precise function that paved the way for the "Hippie Invasion" in rural England during the early sixties.
Unfortunately all such imagery (even when innocently presented) is a risk to the presenter because it may appeal to others at a basal layer of neurological functioning and be largely unconsciously triggered in an unintentional way - if not to anyone else - and especially those who are claimed to be in private contact, as was this OP claiming. It is NOT a matter of utilising the accusatory tense implied in the greek term used biblically when Jesus, says, "Have I not chosen all of you, yet one of you is a devil". That term devil is the accusatory diabalos - and is translated 'devil' as a charachtertic of Satan's endless activity to accuse the brethren both before God and if at all possible before men.
To the below in red from my book.
If we look back into history long before Western societies made way for these ideas to become lawful, we will see that another process was taking place from the beginning in all other cultures. This is evidenced in Egyptian, Indic, Babylonian and Greek cultures, and this had to do with the stripping away of the restraints of the body, and the uncovering of the soul. The very self of the soul, with its powers and abilities to exceed the restraints of the body even unto supernatural heights and abilities, has been an ambition of men and Satan since the beginning. Yet in the past, this was not accomplished in many men but rather in the few, and it represented a knowledge of human anatomy and physiology expressed both anatomically and philosophically through religious practise, informed from the air. as well as experientially. It led to outcomes which were monstrous and profane, as acts of cruelty and perversity which exceed even this day. Things which were common practise and visible to all, in the end, became hidden. They were pressed into the shadows by the light of the gospel. Now, in rejecting Christ, they are once again becoming visible.
So. my use of the British idiomatic tense to 'slate' the British is as favourable to myself as my willingness to do the same of elements of the Constitution of the United States of America - and of course I haven't gone into that - rather to a cultural sense that the United States of America has a very profound link with ingrained British civility that has covered a multitude of rank errors of Judgement in our constitutional Monarchy.
In remembering my friends daughter and her promise of God - and her sons utter disbelief - easily replaced by another prospect of being their sisters' keepers, I also remembered that for many people reality is so grave that they cannot bring themselves to say "flee'. On the other hand some are able to say it easily and NOT be removed from the essential need of the child that became a women and so knows very well that she can hardly face reality at all.
3
3
1
