Here it comes the mark of the beast

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
But yeah, the mark will have the number of his name, it will be visible, a symbol of him. A chip under your skin doesnt really symbolize anything.

Oh, but it will symbolize something! The purpose of the mark is that those who accept it will be identifying themselves with the Beast because it is his mark. And the motivation to receive it will be that without it no one will be able to buy or sell, which is crediting and debiting. The fact that we are already seeing the technology for RFID chip implants under the skin of the hand is a testimony to the truth and accuracy of God's word. Now, I'm sure that this technology will continue to evolve as the world draws closer to the revealing of that man of lawlessness and the final product will be ready for his arrival on the world scene. Whether it is something that is on or in will not matter, for it will allow the individual to perform crediting and debiting to their bank account and therefore Identify them with the beast. However, the fact that we already have people receiving implants under the skin of the hand would be in favor of the mark being under the skin of the hand, at this point anyway.

Jesus said "Whoever tries to keep their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life will preserve it."

I believe that the beast and the false prophet are going to make cash, checks, credit and debit obsolete leaving only that mark as a way for people to be able to electronically credit and debit their bank accounts, which is currently being done via bank cards. The only way for that mark to work will be if there are no other options for buying and selling. I believe that this how he "forces all" to receive that mark. No mark, no access to your money to pay your bills, buy gas, pay your mortgage, eat out, buy groceries or to be able to do anything at all to ones bank account without that mark. Those who receive it, will be doing so to save their lives, for they will love their lives more than God and will do whatever they have to in order to survive.

I believe it will be a mark, or badge. And not an invisible addition to your body.

Badges can be stolen or can be reproduced just like drivers licenses. This mark has to be on the hand or forehead, which will be a device that will allow access to one's bank account allowing them to perform electronic crediting and debiting. As proof of this, all one has to do is look at the evolution of electronic crediting and debiting via bank cards. The majority of purchases today are done via electronic crediting and debiting by the use of bank cards. Denmark is scheduled to be the first country to go completely cashless and perform all transactions electronically via bank cards. This is the trend and the rest of the world will eventually follow. This is all in preparation for the revealing of that antichrist and his mark.
 
Regardless of what the mark of the beast will be, it's not the only determining factor. The Rev.13 chapter reveals those who refuse to worship the "image of the beast" are to be killed.

That "image of the beast" represents an idol, not a mark on the hand or forehand.

The "mark" is connected with buying and selling.

I strongly believe this means in order to receive the "mark", one must first agree to worship the "image of the beast".

Our Heavenly Father is in control, and He is not going to allow the "mark" forced upon anyone who refuses to bow worship to the "image of the beast". So only those who give over their life to Satan will be taking that "mark".

Hello DP,

I personally believe that the way in which "He forces all" to receive the mark, is that by that time, he will have made cash, checks, crediting and debiting via bank cards obsolete, leaving only that mark. Therefore one will have to receive the mark in order to be able to credit and debit ones bank account. So yes, it will be a choice. Those who worship the beast, his image and receive his mark will love their lives more that God and will lose their lives and those who will not worship the beast, his image or receive his mark will love God more than their own lives and will thereby save it.
 
Um guys... the mark of the beast and the number of the beast are not the same thing. 666 is not the mark of the beast, it's the number of his name. The mark of the beast is something else.

Rev_15:2 And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God.
 
Hello DP,

I personally believe that the way in which "He forces all" to receive the mark, is that by that time, he will have made cash, checks, crediting and debiting via bank cards obsolete, leaving only that mark. Therefore one will have to receive the mark in order to be able to credit and debit ones bank account. So yes, it will be a choice. Those who worship the beast, his image and receive his mark will love their lives more that God and will lose their lives and those who will not worship the beast, his image or receive his mark will love God more than their own lives and will thereby save it.

Good to see that you've got that understanding of the Mark 16:25 Scripture. We are not to fear what's coming, even if it leads to death of our flesh body.

Rev 13:12-17
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

This "another beast" of v.11, a second beast, represents the coming false messiah. What does that mean that he will cause those on earth to worship the first beast which is a kingdom beast? I believe that means bringing all nations into agreement of a one-world government. I believe this represents his political power, that false one bringing it all together at that point. At this point, the "mark" nor the "image of the beast" are established yet. That is yet to occur today, he must be revealed on earth first.



13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

This represents his religious power, finally bringing all religions together under one head (his).




14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

At the same time, by those great wonders, and miracles he will do, he will get the world to create the "image to the beast" which had the deadly wound. The beast that had the deadly wound was the first beast mentioned above per v.12, i.e., the kingdom beast, his world kingdom. If we look back to the time of Daniel, the king of Babylon made a golden idol of himself, and required all to bow in worship to it at the sound of the psalter. The main thing to recognize at this point, is that the "image to the beast" is setup in false worship first, if this Scripture here is chronological (I believe it is).




15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

I do not believe that image will miraculously speak, but will involve some type of technology that we already have today. Since all nations will be involved, that would make sense. It will be then that those in all nations will be required to bow in worship to that "image of the beast" (an idol). And those caught refusing will be sentenced to death.




16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
KJV


Then after that "image of the beast" is established in false idol worship, this "mark" is instituted for buying and selling.


In Matt.24 and Mark 13, our Lord Jesus warned His servants in Jerusalem to get out when they see the "abomination of desolation" placed (i.e., that "image to the beast"). In Luke 21, He said for those of His in the countries to not enter in (i.e., don't go into Jerusalem at that time). Thus I believe that is the main point in time of warning to flee from false worship that our Lord Jesus gave us. In Matt.24, our Lord Jesus said He shortened that time.
 
Hi DP,

[/Quote]This "another beast" of v.11, a second beast, represents the coming false messiah.[/quote]

I believe that the first beast out of the sea is the false Messiah and the second beast is the false prophet. The reason for this is that, Rev.13:14 states the following regarding the second beast:

"And he performed great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to the earth in full view of the people. Because of the signs he was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth."

Now compare this to the following verse:

"But the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who had performed the signs on his behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image." (Rev.19:20)

So we can see from the scripture, that the second beast that comes up out of the earth is said to perform those great signs is synonymous with the false prophet in Rev.19:20 who is also mentioned as performing those signs. Second beast = False prophet. That leaves the first beast as being the false Messiah.

The second beast/false prophet will be performing those miracles signs and wonders on behalf of the first beast to give him authenticity/credibility as being God or anything that is called God or worshiped. That second beast/false prophet I believe will be one of the future popes. When he performs these miracles, signs and wonders, then those who have been devout will become even more committed and all those other sects will be pulled into that last day pagan system because of the miraculous signs. And because the false prophet will be doing these things on behalf of the first beast, he will have the entire last day pagan religious system in his hip pocket and that because the people of Mystery Babylon will listen to whatever their leader, that false prophet, the pope, will tell them.
 
I do not believe that image will miraculously speak, but will involve some type of technology that we already have today. Since all nations will be involved, that would make sense. It will be then that those in all nations will be required to bow in worship to that "image of the beast" (an idol). And those caught refusing will be sentenced to death.

Sorry, I posted without continuing the rest and so I am just continuing on this post.

I agree with you here in that, I don't believe that the false prophet will be able to give life to that image, but as you said, has to do with the technology of today and beyond. We have to remember that John is seeing a vision of the future. Here is my personal take on him giving live to the image. Regarding this, John says the following:

"The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed."

So, John is seeing a vision of this future image and he hears the image speak and because of this he attributes it to having life. Today, we have computers, phones, GPS and other devices that speak to us. I wonder what John would have said about those? We also have computer protocol languages on business computers. Now, consider for a moment that John is seeing this vision and what if the speaking that he hears is a computer protocol language? What if the image is the outer casing of the image of the first beast which houses a computer system that the system that the mark runs on? John hears the image speak and because he doesn't know anything about technology, he attributes life to it. It is the same thing along the lines of the mark: John is seeing in the future people receiving something in their right hand or forehead which will allow them to buy and sell and since he doesn't have anything to compare to what he is seeing, so he uses the closest thing from his time frame to describe what he is seeing and he calls it a mark/charagma, (etching, branding, stamp, seal, etc.). My point is that, because of his lack of technology, John can't say, "He causes all both great and small, rich and poor, free and slave to receive a sub-dermal implant that will allow people to perform electronic crediting and debiting to their bank accounts.


Also, I strongly believe that the church, dead and living, will have been removed well prior to the emergence of the beast and his mark, but that's just me. I do however believe that the technology for the coming mark has been evolving ever since the first ATM's, followed by the Universal Product Codes (UPC) and the Point of Sale system (POS) and now the technology for sub-dermal implants under the skin of the hand, which I believe is the beginning stages of the mark which will continue to evolve leading up to the revealing of that man of lawlessness. I don't know if I had sent this to you or not, but I am attaching a BBC Newscast that aired this last January.

Swedish office staff offered implants to access facilities - BBC News
 
Hi DP,

This "another beast" of v.11, a second beast, represents the coming false messiah.

I believe that the first beast out of the sea is the false Messiah and the second beast is the false prophet. The reason for this is that, Rev.13:14 states the following regarding the second beast:

"And he performed great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to the earth in full view of the people. Because of the signs he was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth."

Now compare this to the following verse:

"But the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who had performed the signs on his behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image." (Rev.19:20)

So we can see from the scripture, that the second beast that comes up out of the earth is said to perform those great signs is synonymous with the false prophet in Rev.19:20 who is also mentioned as performing those signs. Second beast = False prophet. That leaves the first beast as being the false Messiah.

I see the first beast that comes out of the "sea" of Rev.13:1 as a kingdom beast because of the reference to Daniel 7 about beast kingdoms given in the very next Rev.13:2 verse linked with it. Also, per Rev.17:15, our Lord Jesus revealed to John that the 'waters' symbolize peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.

But the second beast, the "another beast" starting at Rev.13:11 forward, I see in relation to the "beast" and "false prophet" of Rev.19:20, that "another beast" being the pseudo-Christ of Matt.24:23-26 per the Greek, for that's who works those great signs and wonders on earth (also the one in 2 Thess.2:4). If we look back to Rev.12:3-4 as to what that "red dragon" did of old when he first rebelled drawing a third of the angels into rebellion with him, he had a beast kingdom of ten horns, seven heads, but only seven crowns. We were to notice that difference in crowns. Moreover, we have the prophecy in Daniel about the 'ten horns' representing ten kings, as also in the Rev.17 chapter, so that's about a kingdom structure, not one individual.



The second beast/false prophet will be performing those miracles signs and wonders on behalf of the first beast to give him authenticity/credibility as being God or anything that is called God or worshiped. That second beast/false prophet I believe will be one of the future popes. When he performs these miracles, signs and wonders, then those who have been devout will become even more committed and all those other sects will be pulled into that last day pagan system because of the miraculous signs. And because the false prophet will be doing these things on behalf of the first beast, he will have the entire last day pagan religious system in his hip pocket and that because the people of Mystery Babylon will listen to whatever their leader, that false prophet, the pope, will tell them.

We'll have to wait and see if Satan tries to parallel the Elijah blueprint to announce coming of the future false messiah. That's really where many are getting the idea that there must be a separate false prophet to announce the second beast. I don't see Revelation pointing to that.

I treat the "beast" and "false prophet" of Rev.19:20 as roles that the false messiah himself will play, and those two roles go into the lake of fire when our Lord Jesus returns, but the dragon (Satan) does not yet. I don't find any required Bible witness that any one born flesh goes into the lake of fire until after the GWT Judgment, which is after Christ's future "thousand years" reign.

Therefore, I believe the Revelation Scripture is pointing directly to the "dragon" (Satan) being the one who is coming to earth to work those miracles and great wonders, not any flesh born man. And since the "beast" and "false prophet" are roles he will play, that's how they can be thrown into the lake of fire at Christ's second coming, and not disagree with God's GWT Judgment timing of flesh men that will go into the lake of fire.

Some will say how can Satan come to this earth in our direct presence when he is not a 'man', meaning they think the word 'man' always requires being born in the flesh. The Archangel Gabriel's name means 'man of God', and the two angels seen with Lot by the sodomites were seen as 'men'. Satan has the image of man like we do, which is God's Own Image Likeness which He create us and the angels with.

I know this tends to go against the seminary traditions of man, but it's what I see from the Scriptures of God's Word.
 
Last edited:
When the chip first started so did the mark of the beast thing start. I freaked out because my dog was chipped...lol. I started reading and found a good description of "on" versus "in." Thank God for showing me the difference.


you have a great point there kefa you are so right it does say ON instead of IN i totally stand corrected thanks your interesting input its always good to be corrected according to gods work love in Christ settled
 
I see the first beast that comes out of the "sea" of Rev.13:1 as a kingdom beast because of the reference to Daniel 7 about beast kingdoms given in the very next Rev.13:2 verse linked with it.

The first beast is a kingdom, but is also used to refer to the person of the beast. Even in Daniel he is referred to as a beast/kingdom and as a king. Compare the two scriptures from Daniel and Revelation below:

========================================
"He gave me this explanation: ‘The fourth beast is a fourth kingdom that will appear on earth. It will be different from all the other kingdoms and will devour the whole earth, trampling it down and crushing it. The ten horns are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings. He will speak against the Most High and the saints and try to change the set times and the laws. The saints will be delivered into his hands for a time, times and half a time.


"The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise his authority for forty-two months. He opened his mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven. He was given power to wage war against the saints and to conquer them."

========================================

If the beast was in reference to that last day kingdom, how could an "image" of the beast be made and put into the holy place within the temple as described in Mt.24:15, Rev.13:14-16? This would also demonstrate that the image of the beast will be an image of that last day ruler and not a kingdom. Also, as I have already pointed out, Rev.19:20 has the beast and the false prophet thrown "Alive" into the lake of fire. This would not be proper language if the beast beings spoken of was an entire kingdom. The word "Beast" is used in reference to that last day kingdom, as well as to that last day king of that kingdom. Here is further proof that the beast who comes up from the Abyss is also that last day king:

"The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.

"The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast.

These scriptures above show that the beast as being referred to as a king of that last day kingdom, which is made of iron with the ten toes of partly baked clay. Daniel also refers to the beast as a king, as he is said to be thrown into the fire, which would coincide with Rev.19:20 when he is thrown into the lake of fire alive.

"Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking. I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire. (Dan.7:11)

The beast/king is that "Little horn" that uproots the three of the ten kings before him leaving seven, for he is that eighth king who belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.

he had a beast kingdom of ten horns, seven heads, but only seven crowns. We were to notice that difference in crowns.

The beast/dragon is the same mentioned in chapters 12, 13 and 17, as follows:

Rev.12:3 - Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads.

Rev.13:1 - And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.


Rev.17:3 - There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.

The above beast/dragon is the same entity with different descriptions as follows:

Seven heads: Seven hills upon which the woman sits and represents seven kings of succession

Ten Horns: Ten kings who are made kings after being with the beast for only a short time.

The seven crowns mentioned on the beast in Rev.12:3 are referring to those seven kings of succession and the ten horns are referring to those ten kings who reign in the future concurrently with the beast. In Rev.13:1, again the ten horns represent those ten future kings who will rule concurrently with the beast and the seven heads represent those seven kings of succession. What I mean by those seven kings of succession is that, in John's description of the he said the following:

Five have fallen: That is, at the time that John was receiving this information from the angel, five of those kings had already ruled and gone.

One is: That is, king number six was ruling at the time that John was receiving this information from the angel.

And the other has not yet come: From the time that John was receiving this information, king number six was ruling and king number seven had not come, but when he did come he would remain only for a little while. This would have been future to John, but in the past tense to us. The beast who once was, now is not and will come up out of the Abyss is an eighth king who belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction (Rev.19:20)

The dragon represents Satan as a whole who is the one who is orchestrating these events and people in the background.

"The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray."

"He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years."
 
When the chip first started so did the mark of the beast thing start. I freaked out because my dog was chipped...lol. I started reading and found a good description of "on" versus "in." Thank God for showing me the difference.

Which one do you believe on or in?
 
Take a look at my post #16

Revelation 13:16-17

And he requires everyone — small and great, rich and poor, free and •slave — to be given a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark: the beast's name or the number of his name.

Scripture says ON. I guess I will go with "ON"


Which one do you believe on or in?
 
Which one do you believe on or in?

Take a look at my post #16

Revelation 13:16-17

And he requires everyone — small and great, rich and poor, free and •slave — to be given a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark: the beast's name or the number of his name.

Scripture says ON. I guess I will go with "ON"

Just to throw a monkey wrench in things here, the Greek word translated as "on" in Revelation 13:16 can also be translated as "in" (the KJV renders it as such) and is translated as such in numerous verses throughout the New Testament.

However, the word translated as "mark" tends to give the connotation of something engraved or branded on the surface.
 
It says it will be placed on their ***right hand*** and their forehead. The Greek word translated right hand actually includes the whole right arm. Look at the the photo where the ISIS warriors where the mark:

17bddb38-d268-11e4-_876892c.jpg
 
The first beast is a kingdom, but is also used to refer to the person of the beast. Even in Daniel he is referred to as a beast/kingdom and as a king. Compare the two scriptures from Daniel and Revelation below:

Yes, I'm aware of that. But the one thing the Daniel Scripture does not do, it does not confuse the animal symbols for each beast kingdom with the "little horn" himself.

Because Rev.13:2 is part of the Rev.13:1 description, and Daniel 7 is referred to in Rev.13:2, and the "ten horns" is given as a symbol, it's very important to refer to that part in Daniel 7:

Dan 7:7-8
7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.


8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things
KJV

It's that "little horn" that will have the "mouth speaking great things", i.e., speak against The Most High and the saints, not the kingdom. One must rightly divide the kingdom from that "little horn" king, which Rev.17:8-13 also does:


Rev 17:8-13
8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

This "beast" John saw is not the kingdom, but the one who ascends out of the bottomless pit and goes into perdition. Who ascends out that pit? The "king" of Rev.9 which is the angel of the bottomless pit.




9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.

These previous five kings I interpret as past beast kings of history, and the "one is" in Apostle John's day being the sixth one, with the seventh one still yet to come. This is not about the "ten horns" (i.e., "ten kings") nor the kingdom, but about that "little horn" of Dan.7, another king that comes up among the other ten kings.




11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

This beast of v.8 even is the eighth king that will come, and is of the seven, and this beast king eventually goes into perdition (i.e, into the lake of fire), meaning he is already judged and sentenced to perish in the lake of fire. Who would that be? And when would he as the eighth king be manifest, in what time?



12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
KJV



The "ten horns" John saw in Rev.13:1 represent "ten kings". They do not come to power until that previously mentioned beast king comes to power. So this is speaking of 11 kings altogether, just as the Dan.7 Scripture also is.

So the 'beast' word can apply either to the coming beast king, or to his kingdom, but Scripture is specific which one is being pointed to if we read it carefully. The KJV "his" pronoun in Rev.13:1-3 could have just as easily been translated as "it" from the Greek. The KJV translators had to make an assumption what those symbols were pointing to when chose the pronoun "his". It's the events and symbols given compared with other Scripture like Dan.7 that actually shows us how that first beast in Rev.13:1-2 is about a beast kingdom, not a king. The Rev.13:12 and 13:14 verses also mark that distinction when differentiating between the "first beast before him" and the beast that had the wound by a sword.

In Daniel 4, a chapter written by king Nebuchadnezzar himself, we're shown how the word 'beast' literally can apply to a false king who seeks to exalt himself as God.


If the beast was in reference to that last day kingdom, how could an "image" of the beast be made and put into the holy place within the temple as described in Mt.24:15, Rev.13:14-16? This would also demonstrate that the image of the beast will be an image of that last day ruler and not a kingdom. Also, as I have already pointed out, Rev.19:20 has the beast and the false prophet thrown "Alive" into the lake of fire. This would not be proper language if the beast beings spoken of was an entire kingdom.

I understand your point, and I agree that "beast" being referred to in the Rev.19:20 Scripture is not the beast kingdom. It is the ROLE of the beast king himself.

Notice I said role, like a role in a play on stage. So metaphorically in the sense of a stage play, that 'beast king' role is a character represented by and played by a person. But in a play, when the character is destroyed, the actor playing that role is not. Because there is no Scripture to support any flesh born man already judged and sentenced to go into the "lake of fire" prior to the GWT Judgment, that is the only interpretation that would align within The Word. Satan the "dragon" is that player, and notice he does not go into that "lake of fire" with that "beast" and "false prophet", with that Rev.19:20 event happening at the start of Christ's future "thousand years" reign.

"Then I continued to watch because of the boastful words the horn was speaking. I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire. (Dan.7:11)

The beast/king is that "Little horn" that uproots the three of the ten kings before him leaving seven, for he is that eighth king who belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.

Yes, that would fit the role/character idea that is destroyed at Christ's coming, would it not? Sorry I have to keep repeating, but there's no Scripture evidence of any flesh born man going into the lake of fire prior to the GWT Judgment. You can find more than one Bible witness on the destruction of that beast king role though, the reason being because the Scripture shows us he has already been judged and sentenced to perish. Our Lord Jesus didn't put these 'goes into perdition' markers linked with the one that ascends from the bottomless pit for nothing (Rev.17:8 & 11). We're supposed to recognize that they directly point to the "dragon" (Satan) coming as that beast king and false prophet.

In Matthew 24:23-26, our Lord Jesus warned us of a specific person coming as 'a pseudo Christ' (direct translation from Greek pseudochristos - Strongs no.5580). The working of great signs and wonders are tied with that singular individual, a pseudo Christ coming to Jerusalem, and others will come up to His servants saying, "Lo, here is Christ.' That is the same 2nd beast of Rev.13:11-17, and "dragon" that is worshiped per Rev.13:4. It is the same one of 2 Thess.2:4 involving a temple in Jerusalem.

But will that false one actually be... The Messiah (Jesus Christ)? No. So there's role the "dragon" is coming to play, and this world will be the stage. Our Lord Jesus was called a Prophet also, so would that beast king be the real True Prophet (Jesus Christ)? No. Yet the dragon is coming to play that as a character role also. And then especially the idea of a 'king', who is our True King? Jesus Christ only. Then would that coming beast king be the True King (Jesus Christ)? No.

In many ways, God's Word is showing us that the devil, Satan, that old serpent, and the dragon, is coming to play our Lord Jesus Christ, on earth. That role in the play is not reserved for any flesh born man, it won't be about Satan possessing someone's spirit. It will be Satan himself, here on earth in plain sight, but with the majority believing he will be God Himself, unbelieving Jews thinking he will be Messiah, and many brethren who will fall away to that believing he will be our Lord Jesus Christ.

(Cont.)
 
you guys have a great point the scripture does say ON instead of in so i stand corrected much love in Christ settled

i agree the "mark" will be visual. but in my opinion there is much more to it than just a visual mark. what did Jesus say, "as in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man". what would Jesus be referring to, in the days of Noah, all flesh was corrupt. IMO implanting a chip, trying to improve on our Lords creation, could not be a more perfect example of corrupting the flesh. and very provoking in the eyes of the Lord.
 
i agree the "mark" will be visual. but in my opinion there is much more to it than just a visual mark. what did Jesus say, "as in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man". what would Jesus be referring to, in the days of Noah, all flesh was corrupt. IMO implanting a chip, trying to improve on our Lords creation, could not be a more perfect example of corrupting the flesh. and very provoking in the eyes of the Lord.

The mark of the beast will be like that proverbial line being drawn in the sand. It will be a turning point. During that time, if anyone wants to save his life, they will receive the mark and that because it will become the only way of being able to make purchases via electronic crediting and debiting (buying and selling). Currently, the world is already set up with the system for making electronic purchases and that via various bank cards.

In preparation for that coming beast and his mark, the world has been and is currently being conditioned and programmed by the daily use of electronic crediting and debiting via bank cards. Furthermore, with the acceptance and popularity of tattooing and body piercing, it should be no problem for people to receive a sub-dermal device on their hand or forehead in place of the use of bank cards. In fact, many will probably be looking forward to receiving it. There are already people in Switzerland and other places who are already being implanted with RFID chips, which controls access into their buildings, access to business machines and are also used to purchase food within the building (buying and selling).
 
The beast/dragon is the same mentioned in chapters 12, 13 and 17, as follows:

Rev.12:3 - Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads.

Rev.13:1 - And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.


Rev.17:3 - There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.

The above beast/dragon is the same entity with different descriptions as follows:

I cannot totally agree to that.

The idea of the "dragon" having... is in the sense of possession, power over, ruling over it. Doesn't mean an extension of his own being.

first beast - rises out of the sea
second beast - ascends up out of the earth

Per the Rev.17:8 Scripture, which beast best fits that one who ascends out of the bottomless pit and goes into perdition? That second beast does, i.e, the "another beast" of Rev.13:11 forward that speaks "as a dragon" (because he is the dragon).

The Rev.12:3 example does not mean the the horns, heads, and crowns are a literal extension of his being either. It simply means he was in power over, ruling over, that ten horns, seven heads, and seven crowns.

One of the most important distinctions we are to make between the Rev.12:3 and Rev.13:1 examples is the different number of "crowns", and the time marker in Rev.12:4 when that "red dragon" drew a third of the "stars" (angels) into rebellion with him. That happened in the time of old, prior to this present world.

Now that's a huge revelation our Lord Jesus gave us by that comparison, because in the very next Rev.13 chapter He shows about the beast kingdom Satan will have for the end of this world, with it to have "ten crowns" instead of seven. This gives us more evidence that the horns, heads, and crowns are about a kingdom beast, and not the beast king himself (dragon) that is over them.

Yet many will reject that understanding, because although they might grasp that Rev.12:3-4 beast kingdom idea with Satan having led it personally at the original overthrow prior to today's world, they will still have trouble accepting that the Rev.13:1 beast kingdom example for the last days will also be led in person by Satan himself, on earth, once he is booted out of heaven per Rev.12:7 forward.


Seven heads: Seven hills upon which the woman sits and represents seven kings of succession

I disagree.

The "seven heads" represent seven regions the ten kings are over. In the Rev.12:3 example, Satan's original kingdom had seven crowns (diadeemata) upon seven heads. Diadems upon heads represent rule over territories or domains.

Per Rev.17:1, the "great whore" (i.e, the "woman" you mention), sits upon many "waters". Per Rev.17:15 John is told those "waters" represent "peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues". So it is not about a particular area that has seven literal hills that seven kings came to power over in succession. The "seven heads" will be seven regions the "woman" will have power over at the very end of this world, and they represent nations, peoples, etc. It is also symbolized by "waters" which also points to the "sea" of Rev.13:1. (By the way, Jerusalem has seven hills, which used to be in ancient times one of its descriptors.)

Ten Horns: Ten kings who are made kings after being with the beast for only a short time.

To be more precise, the ten horns ("ten kings") of Rev.17 only come to power WITH the beast king (i.e., "little horn" of Dan.7). They rule with... the beast king for "one hour". That "one hour" is a Biblical symbol our Lord Jesus used to represent the very end of this world, like the time of "great tribulation". That is also the meaning of the "short space" idea in the Rev.17:10 verse about the one who is yet to come (i.e., the seventh beast king).

The seven crowns mentioned on the beast in Rev.12:3 are referring to those seven kings of succession and the ten horns are referring to those ten kings who reign in the future concurrently with the beast. In Rev.13:1, again the ten horns represent those ten future kings who will rule concurrently with the beast and the seven heads represent those seven kings of succession. What I mean by those seven kings of succession is that, in John's description of the he said the following:

I disagree.

The Rev.12:3-4 event timing happened back when Satan first rebelled against God with coveting His Throne. That's why the 3rd verse is tied with the 4th verse. That has nothing to do with the Rev.13 "ten crowns", "seven heads", "ten horns" beast kingdom, except as a previous example for the beast kingdom of Rev.13 that comes at the end of this world.

The subject of the "seven heads" upon which the "woman" sits upon in Rev.17:9 must be separated from the idea of the "seven kings" in verse 10. Verse 10 is a change in subject. The seven mountains are not kings...

From the start at Rev.17:1, we were shown the woman sits over something, what was that? The "waters", and then in Rev.17:15 John is told those "waters" represent "peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues", i.e., nations and regions upon the earth. That's what the "seven heads" are which are "seven mountains".


Five have fallen: That is, at the time that John was receiving this information from the angel, five of those kings had already ruled and gone.

One is: That is, king number six was ruling at the time that John was receiving this information from the angel.

Yes, I agree with that directly above.

And the other has not yet come: From the time that John was receiving this information, king number six was ruling and king number seven had not come, but when he did come he would remain only for a little while. This would have been future to John, but in the past tense to us. The beast who once was, now is not and will come up out of the Abyss is an eighth king who belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction (Rev.19:20)

That above I do not agree with.

Rev 17:10-11
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
KJV


The one that "must continue a short space" is the seventh beast king, and also the same beast king of Rev.17:12-13:

Rev 17:12-13
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
KJV


That "one hour" reference is in the same sense of that "short space" reference. It's about the seventh beast king. It's that one we may expect for the very end of this world.

Who is that eighth beast king then? I will only give a hint. When will be the final rebellion of a false king deceiving the nations to bow to him in place of God?

Rev 17:8
8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
KJV


This above beast is Satan. That is who shall ascend out of the bottomless pit in the last days and go into perdition (i.e., perish in the "lake of fire"). So far today, only he and his angels have already been judged and sentenced to perish in the lake of fire.



The dragon represents Satan as a whole who is the one who is orchestrating these events and people in the background.

"The great dragon was hurled down—that ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, who leads the whole world astray."

"He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years."

Yes, impossible to get around the Rev.12:9 and 2:20 Scripture on who that dragon is.
 
Then we agree to disagree. You're not paying attention to the literal scripture, which says:

"The seven heads you saw are seven hills upon which the woman sits."

Rome was literally built on and is famous for her seven hills. It is meant to point us to her pagan headquarters, the Vatican.

"The woman you saw is that great city that rules over the kings of the earth"

At the time that John was receiving this information, Rome was that city that ruled over the kings of the earth. which is meant to point us to her pagan system.

The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet:

th
th



th
th



She was glittering with gold

th
th


th
th


God leaves clues throughout Revelation and the above is one of them. They are meant to point us to who the woman is. She is Rome with her Mystery Babylon system. I've studied this for over 40 years, I know what I am talking about.

Per the Rev.17:8 Scripture, which beast best fits that one who ascends out of the bottomless pit and goes into perdition? That second beast does, i.e, the "another beast" of Rev.13:11 forward that speaks "as a dragon" (because he is the dragon).

The reference to the beast coming up out of the sea and the second beast coming up out of the earth are not literal. That is, the second beast is not literally coming up out of the earth and therefore, your application to him being the beast who comes up out of the Abyss is unfounded. The main character is the first beast and the second beast is doing everything for the first beasts authenticity as being God or anything that is called God or worshiped. The first beast is the one who comes up out of the Abyss, he is that eighth king and he is also the one who receives the fatal wound.



 
Then we agree to disagree. You're not paying attention to the literal scripture, which says:

"The seven heads you saw are seven hills upon which the woman sits."

Rome was literally built on and is famous for her seven hills. It is meant to point us to her pagan headquarters, the Vatican.

Yes, we most definitely disagree, and I am not Catholic, but a Protestant Christian.

Rev 17:9
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
KJV

The harlot of Revelation is not Rome. It has not even manifested yet, because the beast king and ten kings that reign with him for one hour are not yet in power. It's not about history, it's about the very end of this world just prior to our Lord Jesus' return.

Jerusalem will be the 'harlot' of Revelation, but only when the coming pseudo-Christ is setup there, which is still future. Jerusalem is where the center of control for the coming one-world government will be. Rome is only a small player in that.
 
Just to throw a monkey wrench in things here, the Greek word translated as "on" in Revelation 13:16 can also be translated as "in" (the KJV renders it as such) and is translated as such in numerous verses throughout the New Testament.

However, the word translated as "mark" tends to give the connotation of something engraved or branded on the surface.
Here's another monkey wrench lol. Is God talking about the physical right hand or the spiritual right hand?