Can't provide a link, then it's not news? So if Adolph Hitler is killing all the Jews in Europe, we can't mention that here unless we have a link?I've noticed there are individuals who like to spam the news. With irrelevant hyperbolic nonsense that is not really news. A good rule of thumb would be if you can't provide a link then is not news
Can't provide a link, then it's not news? So if Adolph Hitler is killing all the Jews in Europe, we can't mention that here unless we have a link?
Can't provide a link, then it's not news? So if Adolph Hitler is killing all the Jews in Europe, we can't mention that here unless we have a link?
Ummmmmmmmmm, Adolph Hitler died eons ago..LOL
I've noticed there are individuals who like to spam the news. With irrelevant hyperbolic nonsense that is not really news. A good rule of thumb would be if you can't provide a link then is not news
I was trying to make a point.Ummmmmmmmmm, Adolph Hitler died eons ago..LOL
I was trying to make a point.That is not happening now as he is dead..... here is a link for you....Adolf Hitler commits suicide - Apr 30, 1945 - HISTORY.com
Ummmmmmmmmm, Adolph Hitler died eons ago..LOL
If you want a more modern example, I'll give you one. I heard on the news, late in Obama's presidency, that Obama was threatening to withhold funds from schools that wouldn't force girls to shower with boys who wanted to be girls. I can think of few things sicker than this. The whole world should be made to know what Obama was trying to do. Are you suggesting that on this website, we keep quiet about news like this unless we can find a link?That is not happening now as he is dead..... here is a link for you....Adolf Hitler commits suicide - Apr 30, 1945 - HISTORY.com
If you want a more modern example, I'll give you one. I heard on the news, late in Obama's presidency, that Obama was threatening to withhold funds from schools that wouldn't force girls to shower with boys who wanted to be girls. I can think of few things sicker than this. The whole world should be made to know what Obama was trying to do. Are you suggesting that on this website, we keep quiet about news like this unless we can find a link?
But neither of you was satisfied with my Hitler example, so I assumed you wanted something more current.JL and I haven't said anything about not providing news unless we have a link.. Chill out.![]()
But neither of you was satisfied with my Hitler example, so I assumed you wanted something more current.
Because rules have unintended consequences.The intent of the OP was obvious. Why bringing in the typical BDF argumentative rhetoric in I'm not sure.
Because rules have unintended consequences.
Limit people to two posts a day? Do you mean limit people to one or two new threads a day? If you limited people to two posts a day, I think most of us would leave. I'd use up my two posts greeting people in the new members forum.a no spamming rule would not be unreasonable.
Maybe limit people to one or two posts per day
If someone is burying us with threads, that would be a problem. However, sometimes a person is troubled about something and needs more than two threads to get it out. I think one shouldn't be quick to create rules. I would attribute much of the success of this website to the freedom we have to express ourselves.Not really interested in seeing one member turn the news feed into their own personal blog.