One of your favourite pro-KJV arguments is based on a text that the KJV translators "corrected".And yet, there are many on here who love correcting it...just saying.
Do I need to point out the blatant hypocrisy?
One of your favourite pro-KJV arguments is based on a text that the KJV translators "corrected".And yet, there are many on here who love correcting it...just saying.
One of your favourite pro-KJV arguments is based on a text that the KJV translators "corrected".
Do I need to point out the blatant hypocrisy?
The King James is the 10th English Bible. The Geneva Bible would be 7th.Purified seven times. The KJV was seventh in line...![]()
The King James is the 10th English Bible. The Geneva Bible would be 7th.
Wycliffe, Tyndale, Coverdale, Matthew, Great, Taverner, Geneva, Bishops', Douay-Rheims, and King James; respectively and in order = ten English Bibles.
You don't get to just throw out 3 Bible translations to force history to fit your narrative.The seven English versions that make the English Bibles up to and including the Authorized Version fit the description in Psalm 12:6 of the words of the Lord being "purified seven times" are Tyndale's, Matthew's, Coverdale's, the Great Bible (printed by Whitechurch), the Geneva Bible, the Bishops' Bible, and the King James Bible.
The Wycliffe, Taverner, and Douay-Rheims Bibles, whatever merits any of them may have, are not part of the purified line God "authorized," of which the King James Authorized Version is God's last one -- purified seven times.
If we are going to miss apply Psalms in such a way, the Geneva Bible is the 7th and thus the Holy Bible. Which would make the King James what it is, a translation to appease the papists because the Geneva pointed out the failing of popery in it's margin notes.The seven English versions that make the English Bibles up to and including the Authorized Version fit the description in Psalm 12:6 of the words of the Lord being "purified seven times" are Tyndale's, Matthew's, Coverdale's, the Great Bible (printed by Whitechurch), the Geneva Bible, the Bishops' Bible, and the King James Bible.
The Wycliffe, Taverner, and Douay-Rheims Bibles, whatever merits any of them may have, are not part of the purified line God "authorized," of which the King James Authorized Version is God's last one -- purified seven times.
Hogwash. Long since refuted.Purified seven times. The KJV was seventh in line...![]()
The seven English versions that make the English Bibles up to and including the Authorized Version fit the description in Psalm 12:6 of the words of the Lord being "purified seven times" are Tyndale's, Matthew's, Coverdale's, the Great Bible (printed by Whitechurch), the Geneva Bible, the Bishops' Bible, and the King James Bible.
The Wycliffe, Taverner, and Douay-Rheims Bibles, whatever merits any of them may have, are not part of the purified line God "authorized," of which the King James Authorized Version is God's last one -- purified seven times.

Finally you admit it.Yes, God’s word is inerrant! But I have no idea where it’s at.
I dare anyone to read the Wycliffe Bible!! 1395 English. Commonly called Middle English!! Over 700 years ago.The King James is the 10th English Bible. The Geneva Bible would be 7th.
Wycliffe, Tyndale, Coverdale, Matthew, Great, Taverner, Geneva, Bishops', Douay-Rheims, and King James; respectively and in order = ten English Bibles.