A. Sure, anyone who has read and believes the scriptures can see that some miracles are
more dramatic and visible than others. However, this in no way suggests that the
less obvious acts of God must be
differentiated by placing them in a completely separate category of
supernatural yet non-miraculous miracles which not only redundant but oxymoronic. It is an attempt to arrive at an interpretation you hold by altering the meaning of the text.
B. The question to be asked, though, is whether Jesus Himself made such a distinction? When I read His words, it is evident to me that He did not. When the Savior told us not to worry, the basis of His assurance was His understanding that the Father is
already concerned about our welfare and that He is involved in answering our "mundane" prayers for "daily bread."
…31 THEREFORE (because of the Father's love for us) do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we EAT?’ or ‘What shall we DRINK?’ or ‘What shall we WEAR?’ 32 For the Gentiles strive after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these THINGS WILL BE ADDED unto you.…
(
Matthew 6:31)
God is not too busy
upholding the universe by the word of His power to feed the "
ravens" under His care. If you have ever been in a place where you could not afford to pay for basic necessities and did not know HOW God would help you then you might take the
prayer for daily bread more seriously.
You are fixated on categorizing different kinds of miracles because of a presupposition you have - which is that God no longer does CERTAIN KINDS of miracles. To make that point you have to define miracles very
narrowly as being both
visible and dramatic. Jesus understood that some miracles are dramatic and that others are less so. However, He did not find it necessary to create a whole new system of nomenclature to make this point.