Is cessation an observation or theology?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Or, Daniel's prophecies are true and we just don't what they mean yet.


Daniel 12:8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for
the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.

Amos 3:7 "Surely the Sovereign LORD does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets.

And we are starting to understand it. So the time is near.


🕊️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Genez
Hello! I believe there is a gap between the Old and New Testaments, 400 or so years when there was no new revelation from God. Rather a patiently waiting for the Messiah to come.

In the same way the book of Revelation was the last canonical book in the bible. Is it possible we're now waiting patiently for the return of the Lord- rather than seeking new revelation should we not just be doing what God has already told us, i'e the Great Commission etc.

Just some food for thought. Hope you're well today, God Bless you all.
Anna was a prophetess during that time. The Lord revealed to Simeon during that time that he wouldn't die until he saw the Messiah.
 
Anna was a prophetess during that time. The Lord revealed to Simeon during that time that he wouldn't die until he saw the Messiah.

Hello presidente,

Yes Simeon and Anna prophecied around the year 0 about the imminent coming of the Messiah. There is I believe a 400-450 year gap between the book of Malachi and them when God did not provide any new Revelation.

Fillan:
Based on the last chapter of Daniel, which was added to an existing older text, one can very accurately determine that this text was written around 167 BC - based on the idea that whoever wrote Daniel was looking backward for much of the text incorporating stories from the Babylonian captivity.

Hello biblestudent. I personally believe the book of Daniel was written much earlier than that. The Historical information in the book of Daniel has been proved to be of greater reliability than secular Historians like Herodotus. I believe my point stands, there is a period between the Old and New Testaments when no new Revelation was given and there is now a period since the book of Revelation when no new Canonical Revelation has been given. God bless you both have a good week.
 
Hello presidente,

Yes Simeon and Anna prophecied around the year 0 about the imminent coming of the Messiah. There is I believe a 400-450 year gap between the book of Malachi and them when God did not provide any new Revelation.



Hello biblestudent. I personally believe the book of Daniel was written much earlier than that. The Historical information in the book of Daniel has been proved to be of greater reliability than secular Historians like Herodotus. I believe my point stands, there is a period between the Old and New Testaments when no new Revelation was given and there is now a period since the book of Revelation when no new Canonical Revelation has been given. God bless you both have a good week.
Fillan: As I have noted, some Hebrew Bible prophecies were written after the fact, looking back and pretending they were forecasting the future. This is especially true about the book of Daniel that has both old stories about the Babylonian captivity written much later and additions to the book of Daniel attempting to leverage the older stories with later prophecies couched in the past.

Scholars date the last chapters of the book of Daniel to the second century BCE because the text accurately describes real historical events up to 167 BCE and then incorrectly predicts how King Antiochus IV Epiphanes would die.

Main Reasons for the Second-Century Date Accurate history up to 167 BCE: The book describes the wars and political actions of the Greek ruler Antiochus IV with precise detail. Historians note this looks like a report of past events rather than a prediction of the future.

Failed final prediction: The text claims that Antiochus IV will die in the Middle East near the Holy Land. In reality, the king died in Persia in 164 BCE, showing the author lived through the earlier events but guessed wrong about the end. Language and vocabulary: The Hebrew and Aramaic text contains late Persian and Greek loanwords. These words did not exist in the sixth century BCE when Daniel was supposed to live in Babylon. Placement in the Bible: The Hebrew Bible places Daniel in the Writings section instead of the Prophets. This placement indicates the book was written after the collection of prophetic books was already closed.

Books Updated and Reinterpreted as Prophecy Book Original Layer / Context Later Updates & Prophetic Framing

Isaiah Eighth-century BCE oracles (Chapters 1–39) warning Judah of Assyrian aggression.

Deutero-Isaiah (Ch. 40–55) and Trito-Isaiah (Ch. 56–66) were added centuries later by anonymous exilic/post-exilic scribes. They update the book to predict the rise of Cyrus the Great, the end of the Babylonian exile, and a cosmic future restoration.

Zechariah - Historical visions of the 6th-century BCE prophet regarding the rebuilding of the Second Temple (Chapters 1–8). Deutero-Zechariah (Ch. 9–14) consists of late, anonymous apocalyptic oracles. These layers updated the historical text with eschatological prophecies concerning a warrior king, the final siege of Jerusalem, and global judgment.

Amos - Raw, eighth-century BCE oracles targeting the social injustice of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.
Scribes edited the text during the Babylonian exile, adding the final "Deuteronomistic" salvation oracle (Amos 9:11–15). This post-exilic epilogue updated Amos’s strict doom into a hopeful prophecy about rebuilding the fallen tent of David.

Micah - Pre-exilic social critiques focused primarily on the immediate destruction of Samaria and Jerusalem.
Post-exilic scribes added liturgical and hopeful expansions, notably the famous peace prophecy in Micah 4 (shared with Isaiah) and the liturgical prayer in Micah 7. These later additions transformed a book of immediate local warning into a sweeping prophecy of ultimate restoration.

It is strange that you introduced Herodotus as he does not list the Belshazzar as any King in Babylon which the book of Daniel does.

The Twelve (Minor Prophets) Separate historical scrolls written by individual prophets over several centuries. Late Persian-era scribes deliberately bound these twelve booklets into a single, unified macro-scroll. They added linking catchwords and editorial glosses to force the distinct historical messages to read as a single, multi-phased prophecy culminating in the Day of the Lord.

Thus, the late additions to Daniel, pretending an earlier prediction, is totally consistent with other Hebrew Bible books that have gone through the same later addition and reformulation. If one can claim "inspiration" for the original versus, one can also claim "inspiration" to those who later modified the earlier scrolls.

The Greek Additions to the Book of Daniel consist of three distinct narrative and poetic sections found in ancient Greek versions like the Septuagint and Theodotion's translation. While excluded from the Hebrew Masoretic Text and modern Protestant Bibles, they are fully accepted as canonical Scripture in Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox traditions only. They are in the Bible for these majority of Christians who have ever lived, but not in the Protestant versions.

The specific contents, structure, and placement of these three additions include:1. The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children Placement: Inserted directly inside Chapter 3, between verses 23 and 24. It expands upon the narrative of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego inside the fiery furnace.

Specific Contents:The Penitential Prayer: Azariah (Abednego's Hebrew name) prays from inside the fire. He confesses the sins of Israel, acknowledges God's justice in delivering them into captivity, and begs for divine mercy.The Deliverance Narrative: A brief prose passage describes the Babylonian executioners fueling the furnace until the flames surge 49 cubits high. An angel of the Lord descends, strikes the flames out of the furnace, and creates a cool, wind-swept moisture in the center, leaving the youths unharmed.

The Song of Praise: A liturgical hymn of praise sung in unison by all three men. It calls upon all of creation—angels, heavens, waters, sun, stars, weather, and humanity—to bless, praise, and exalt God forever

Daniel’s Intervention: As she is led away, God inspires a young youth named Daniel. He halts the procession and demands a proper trial. He separates the two elders and cross-examines them individually, asking each under which tree they caught Susanna. One names a mastic tree; the other names an evergreen oak. Their conflicting lies expose the conspiracy, Susanna is vindicated, the elders are executed, and Daniel establishes his reputation for divinely inspired wisdom.

Bel and the DragonPlacement: Positioned as an epilogue at the very end of the book, making up Chapter 14.Specific Contents: This section contains two distinct, independent tales of Daniel outwitting Babylonian idolatry:The Deception of Bel: King Cyrus challenges Daniel to explain why he doesn't worship the great idol Bel, noting that the deity consumes massive amounts of flour, oil, and 40 sheep every night. Daniel claims the idol is just clay and bronze. To settle it, the King seals the temple doors. Daniel secretly scatters ashes across the floor. The next morning, the food is gone, but Daniel shows the King the footprints left by the priests and their families who snuck in through a hidden trapdoor. The priests are executed, and the temple is destroyed.The Slaughter of the Great Dragon: The Babylonians also worship a massive living dragon or serpent. Daniel tells the King he can kill it without a sword or club. He cooks a mixture of pitch, fat, and hair into cakes and feeds them to the beast. The dragon eats them and bursts open.The Lions' Den (Extended): Enraged by the destruction of their gods, the locals force Cyrus to throw Daniel into a lions' den containing seven starved lions for six days. God miraculously preserves Daniel. Furthermore, an angel picks up the prophet Habakkuk in Judea by his hair, flies him to Babylon to deliver a bowl of stew to Daniel, and flies him right back. On the seventh day, the King finds Daniel alive, proclaims the greatness of God, and throws Daniel’s accusers into the den, where they are instantly eaten.
 
Fillan: As I have noted, some Hebrew Bible prophecies were written after the fact, looking back and pretending they were forecasting the future. This is especially true about the book of Daniel that has both old stories about the Babylonian captivity written much later and additions to the book of Daniel attempting to leverage the older stories with later prophecies couched in the past.

Scholars date the last chapters of the book of Daniel to the second century BCE because the text accurately describes real historical events up to 167 BCE and then incorrectly predicts how King Antiochus IV Epiphanes would die.

Main Reasons for the Second-Century Date Accurate history up to 167 BCE: The book describes the wars and political actions of the Greek ruler Antiochus IV with precise detail. Historians note this looks like a report of past events rather than a prediction of the future.

Failed final prediction: The text claims that Antiochus IV will die in the Middle East near the Holy Land. In reality, the king died in Persia in 164 BCE, showing the author lived through the earlier events but guessed wrong about the end. Language and vocabulary: The Hebrew and Aramaic text contains late Persian and Greek loanwords. These words did not exist in the sixth century BCE when Daniel was supposed to live in Babylon. Placement in the Bible: The Hebrew Bible places Daniel in the Writings section instead of the Prophets. This placement indicates the book was written after the collection of prophetic books was already closed.

Books Updated and Reinterpreted as Prophecy Book Original Layer / Context Later Updates & Prophetic Framing

Isaiah Eighth-century BCE oracles (Chapters 1–39) warning Judah of Assyrian aggression.

Deutero-Isaiah (Ch. 40–55) and Trito-Isaiah (Ch. 56–66) were added centuries later by anonymous exilic/post-exilic scribes. They update the book to predict the rise of Cyrus the Great, the end of the Babylonian exile, and a cosmic future restoration.

Zechariah - Historical visions of the 6th-century BCE prophet regarding the rebuilding of the Second Temple (Chapters 1–8). Deutero-Zechariah (Ch. 9–14) consists of late, anonymous apocalyptic oracles. These layers updated the historical text with eschatological prophecies concerning a warrior king, the final siege of Jerusalem, and global judgment.

Amos - Raw, eighth-century BCE oracles targeting the social injustice of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.
Scribes edited the text during the Babylonian exile, adding the final "Deuteronomistic" salvation oracle (Amos 9:11–15). This post-exilic epilogue updated Amos’s strict doom into a hopeful prophecy about rebuilding the fallen tent of David.

Micah - Pre-exilic social critiques focused primarily on the immediate destruction of Samaria and Jerusalem.
Post-exilic scribes added liturgical and hopeful expansions, notably the famous peace prophecy in Micah 4 (shared with Isaiah) and the liturgical prayer in Micah 7. These later additions transformed a book of immediate local warning into a sweeping prophecy of ultimate restoration.

It is strange that you introduced Herodotus as he does not list the Belshazzar as any King in Babylon which the book of Daniel does.

The Twelve (Minor Prophets) Separate historical scrolls written by individual prophets over several centuries. Late Persian-era scribes deliberately bound these twelve booklets into a single, unified macro-scroll. They added linking catchwords and editorial glosses to force the distinct historical messages to read as a single, multi-phased prophecy culminating in the Day of the Lord.

Thus, the late additions to Daniel, pretending an earlier prediction, is totally consistent with other Hebrew Bible books that have gone through the same later addition and reformulation. If one can claim "inspiration" for the original versus, one can also claim "inspiration" to those who later modified the earlier scrolls.

The Greek Additions to the Book of Daniel consist of three distinct narrative and poetic sections found in ancient Greek versions like the Septuagint and Theodotion's translation. While excluded from the Hebrew Masoretic Text and modern Protestant Bibles, they are fully accepted as canonical Scripture in Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox traditions only. They are in the Bible for these majority of Christians who have ever lived, but not in the Protestant versions.

The specific contents, structure, and placement of these three additions include:1. The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children Placement: Inserted directly inside Chapter 3, between verses 23 and 24. It expands upon the narrative of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego inside the fiery furnace.

Specific Contents:The Penitential Prayer: Azariah (Abednego's Hebrew name) prays from inside the fire. He confesses the sins of Israel, acknowledges God's justice in delivering them into captivity, and begs for divine mercy.The Deliverance Narrative: A brief prose passage describes the Babylonian executioners fueling the furnace until the flames surge 49 cubits high. An angel of the Lord descends, strikes the flames out of the furnace, and creates a cool, wind-swept moisture in the center, leaving the youths unharmed.

The Song of Praise: A liturgical hymn of praise sung in unison by all three men. It calls upon all of creation—angels, heavens, waters, sun, stars, weather, and humanity—to bless, praise, and exalt God forever

Daniel’s Intervention: As she is led away, God inspires a young youth named Daniel. He halts the procession and demands a proper trial. He separates the two elders and cross-examines them individually, asking each under which tree they caught Susanna. One names a mastic tree; the other names an evergreen oak. Their conflicting lies expose the conspiracy, Susanna is vindicated, the elders are executed, and Daniel establishes his reputation for divinely inspired wisdom.

Bel and the DragonPlacement: Positioned as an epilogue at the very end of the book, making up Chapter 14.Specific Contents: This section contains two distinct, independent tales of Daniel outwitting Babylonian idolatry:The Deception of Bel: King Cyrus challenges Daniel to explain why he doesn't worship the great idol Bel, noting that the deity consumes massive amounts of flour, oil, and 40 sheep every night. Daniel claims the idol is just clay and bronze. To settle it, the King seals the temple doors. Daniel secretly scatters ashes across the floor. The next morning, the food is gone, but Daniel shows the King the footprints left by the priests and their families who snuck in through a hidden trapdoor. The priests are executed, and the temple is destroyed.The Slaughter of the Great Dragon: The Babylonians also worship a massive living dragon or serpent. Daniel tells the King he can kill it without a sword or club. He cooks a mixture of pitch, fat, and hair into cakes and feeds them to the beast. The dragon eats them and bursts open.The Lions' Den (Extended): Enraged by the destruction of their gods, the locals force Cyrus to throw Daniel into a lions' den containing seven starved lions for six days. God miraculously preserves Daniel. Furthermore, an angel picks up the prophet Habakkuk in Judea by his hair, flies him to Babylon to deliver a bowl of stew to Daniel, and flies him right back. On the seventh day, the King finds Daniel alive, proclaims the greatness of God, and throws Daniel’s accusers into the den, where they are instantly eaten.
Which chapters of Daniel do you believe were added to the book?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lrs68 and Roger316
Cameron143:
The portions of the Book of Daniel considered by scholars to be later Greek additions—absent from the traditional Hebrew and Aramaic text—are Susanna (often labeled Chapter 13), Bel and the Dragon (often labeled Chapter 14), and The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children (inserted into Chapter 3)

Daniel 11 (The Detailed Hellenistic History): Scholars point to Daniel 11 as the clearest example of a pseudo-prophecy, because it outlines with extreme chronological accuracy the precise historical conflicts, marriage alliances, and political maneuvers between the "King of the North" (Seleucid Empire) and the "King of the South" (Ptolemaic Empire) all the way up to the desecration of the Jerusalem Temple by Antiochus IV in 167 BCE, yet grows vague or inaccurate regarding what happened immediately after his death

Daniel 8 - This vision details the overthrow of the Medo-Persian empire by Greece (specifically Alexander the Great) and the subsequent splintering of his kingdom, culminating in the abusive "little horn" ruler who stops the daily sacrifices—widely interpreted by historians as a coded depiction of Antiochus IV.

Daniel 7 (The Four Beasts): Representing four successive kingdoms (traditionally Babylonia, Media, Persia, and Greece in this framework), this vision focuses heavily on the final beast and the little horn that speaks pompous words against the Most High, reflecting the severe religious persecution faced by Judeans under Seleucid rule.

Daniel 9 (The Seventy Weeks): While framed as an interpretation of Jeremiah's prophecy regarding earlier exilic timelines, critical analysis views the reset timeline and focus on the defilement of the sanctuary as a reflection of the acute crisis of the mid-2nd century BCE. The apocalyptic literary style and the presence of specific Greek loanwords align with a Hellenistic-era milieu rather than a 6th-century BCE Babylonian/Persian setting.

Historical Accuracy Shift: The narratives are remarkably precise about 2nd-century BCE Mediterranean politics up to 167 BCE, but fail to correctly predict the actual death or immediate aftermath of Antiochus IV.

Theological Development: Concepts within the text—such as fully developed named archangels (Michael, Gabriel) and a clear doctrine of individual eschatological resurrection—do not appear in earlier verified Persian-period biblical texts.

The discovery and analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls adds validation to the late portions of Daniel. Recent breakthroughs using radiocarbon testing and artificial intelligence programs (such as the Enoch project) have re-evaluated the handwriting and physical material of the scrolls.The 4Q114 Manuscript: The scroll known as 4QDanᶜ (4Q114), which contains sections of Daniel’s final visions, was traditionally dated palaeographically to around 165–160 BCE. The New Timeline: Revised testing shifted its calibrated origin to potentially a longer time frame of to 230–160 BCE.The Implication: If a copy of Daniel already existed or was being actively transcribed around 160 BCE it fit with the later writing of portions of the Book of Daniel as the Dead Sea Scrolls do not contain a full version of the Book of Daniel.
 
Cameron143:
The portions of the Book of Daniel considered by scholars to be later Greek additions—absent from the traditional Hebrew and Aramaic text—are Susanna (often labeled Chapter 13), Bel and the Dragon (often labeled Chapter 14), and The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children (inserted into Chapter 3)

Daniel 11 (The Detailed Hellenistic History): Scholars point to Daniel 11 as the clearest example of a pseudo-prophecy, because it outlines with extreme chronological accuracy the precise historical conflicts, marriage alliances, and political maneuvers between the "King of the North" (Seleucid Empire) and the "King of the South" (Ptolemaic Empire) all the way up to the desecration of the Jerusalem Temple by Antiochus IV in 167 BCE, yet grows vague or inaccurate regarding what happened immediately after his death

Daniel 8 - This vision details the overthrow of the Medo-Persian empire by Greece (specifically Alexander the Great) and the subsequent splintering of his kingdom, culminating in the abusive "little horn" ruler who stops the daily sacrifices—widely interpreted by historians as a coded depiction of Antiochus IV.

Daniel 7 (The Four Beasts): Representing four successive kingdoms (traditionally Babylonia, Media, Persia, and Greece in this framework), this vision focuses heavily on the final beast and the little horn that speaks pompous words against the Most High, reflecting the severe religious persecution faced by Judeans under Seleucid rule.

Daniel 9 (The Seventy Weeks): While framed as an interpretation of Jeremiah's prophecy regarding earlier exilic timelines, critical analysis views the reset timeline and focus on the defilement of the sanctuary as a reflection of the acute crisis of the mid-2nd century BCE. The apocalyptic literary style and the presence of specific Greek loanwords align with a Hellenistic-era milieu rather than a 6th-century BCE Babylonian/Persian setting.

Historical Accuracy Shift: The narratives are remarkably precise about 2nd-century BCE Mediterranean politics up to 167 BCE, but fail to correctly predict the actual death or immediate aftermath of Antiochus IV.

Theological Development: Concepts within the text—such as fully developed named archangels (Michael, Gabriel) and a clear doctrine of individual eschatological resurrection—do not appear in earlier verified Persian-period biblical texts.

The discovery and analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls adds validation to the late portions of Daniel. Recent breakthroughs using radiocarbon testing and artificial intelligence programs (such as the Enoch project) have re-evaluated the handwriting and physical material of the scrolls.The 4Q114 Manuscript: The scroll known as 4QDanᶜ (4Q114), which contains sections of Daniel’s final visions, was traditionally dated palaeographically to around 165–160 BCE. The New Timeline: Revised testing shifted its calibrated origin to potentially a longer time frame of to 230–160 BCE.The Implication: If a copy of Daniel already existed or was being actively transcribed around 160 BCE it fit with the later writing of portions of the Book of Daniel as the Dead Sea Scrolls do not contain a full version of the Book of Daniel.
There are only 12 chapters in the book of Daniel that I have ever seen. What bible translation has more?

Also, how many languages was the book of Daniel written in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: biblestudent78
Hello presidente,

Yes Simeon and Anna prophecied around the year 0 about the imminent coming of the Messiah. There is I believe a 400-450 year gap between the book of Malachi and them when God did not provide any new Revelation.



Hello biblestudent. I personally believe the book of Daniel was written much earlier than that. The Historical information in the book of Daniel has been proved to be of greater reliability than secular Historians like Herodotus. I believe my point stands, there is a period between the Old and New Testaments when no new Revelation was given and there is now a period since the book of Revelation when no new Canonical Revelation has been given. God bless you both have a good week.
None of our books of the Bible were written. That doesn't mean there was no revelation. I do recall some literature considered to have been written in the intertestamental time, but named the testament... of one of the patriarchs. It said something about the Holy Spirit coming down like a dove and resting on the Messiah. Anna, the prophetess and Simeon were old. They could have received revelation in the BC era for all we know.
 
Which chapters of Daniel do you believe were added to the book?
These scholars were practicing a form of atheism called critical text theory. They couldn't believe that Daniel's predictions would be so close to actual history because they ruled out the supernatural out of hand. So they used their creative minds to invent theories to "support" their contention that the only way that Prophecy can be so close to history must be because Israel decided to write history as if it was prophecy. Those theories have been debunked.
 
There are only 12 chapters in the book of Daniel that I have ever seen. What bible translation has more?

Also, how many languages was the book of Daniel written in?
In addition, those who practice critical text theory have noticed that Daniel's writing style seems to have changed. They interpret this as multiple authors. A simpler, more straightforward explanation is that the writing style of all human writers changes over time for obvious reasons. People gain a larger vocabulary and their audience creates more idioms and figures of speech from which the author can draw. There weren't several authors of the book of Daniel. No, Daniel wrote over an extended lifetime, and his writing style changed over time as it naturally would.
 
  • Heart
Reactions: Cameron143
There are only 12 chapters in the book of Daniel that I have ever seen. What bible translation has more?

Also, how many languages was the book of Daniel written in?
Cameron143
Excellent question. Historically, there are two answers. Roughly 62 % of Christians alive today believe that the Book of Daniel in their bible contains 14 chapters as does the Septuagint Greek version of the Hebrew Bible but not the Hebrew Masoretic text of 1,000 AD.

Protestant Bibles have 12 chapters. These traditions follow the traditional Hebrew/Aramaic text, omitting the extra Greek sections. These Greek sections were part of the Jewish Scholars that translated the Hebrew Bible into the Greek version called the Septuagint. Many new testament authors refer to this Greek version of the Hebrew Bible when they quote from it.

In The bible accepted by non-protestants the 14 chapters are found in the Septuagint. These include: Chapter 3 addition: The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children is integrated directly into chapter 3. Chapter 13: Susanna and the Elders is added as the thirteenth chapter. Chapter 14: Bel and the Dragon forms the final fourteenth chapter.

Some of the text of Daniel was composed during the Babylonian captivity or shortly thereafter where the Jews learned to read, write and speak Aramaic - the language of Babylon and later Persia who ruled Judea from 539 BCE to 332. Hebrew bible authors writing after the return from captivity incorporated certain Aramaic terms as they authored later books of the bible.

Chapters 1:1–2:4a: Written in Hebrew Chapters 2:4b–7:28: Written in Aramaic Chapters 8:1–12:13: Written in Hebrew Highlights of the Aramaic Section Chapter 2: Nebuchadnezzar's dream of the multi-metal statue Chapter 3: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in the fiery furnace Chapter 4: Nebuchadnezzar's tree dream and madness Chapter 5: Belshazzar's feast and the writing on the wall Chapter 6: Daniel in the lions' den Chapter 7: Vision of the four beasts coming from the sea
 
Cameron143
Excellent question. Historically, there are two answers. Roughly 62 % of Christians alive today believe that the Book of Daniel in their bible contains 14 chapters as does the Septuagint Greek version of the Hebrew Bible but not the Hebrew Masoretic text of 1,000 AD.

Protestant Bibles have 12 chapters. These traditions follow the traditional Hebrew/Aramaic text, omitting the extra Greek sections. These Greek sections were part of the Jewish Scholars that translated the Hebrew Bible into the Greek version called the Septuagint. Many new testament authors refer to this Greek version of the Hebrew Bible when they quote from it.

In The bible accepted by non-protestants the 14 chapters are found in the Septuagint. These include: Chapter 3 addition: The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children is integrated directly into chapter 3. Chapter 13: Susanna and the Elders is added as the thirteenth chapter. Chapter 14: Bel and the Dragon forms the final fourteenth chapter.

Some of the text of Daniel was composed during the Babylonian captivity or shortly thereafter where the Jews learned to read, write and speak Aramaic - the language of Babylon and later Persia who ruled Judea from 539 BCE to 332. Hebrew bible authors writing after the return from captivity incorporated certain Aramaic terms as they authored later books of the bible.

Chapters 1:1–2:4a: Written in Hebrew Chapters 2:4b–7:28: Written in Aramaic Chapters 8:1–12:13: Written in Hebrew Highlights of the Aramaic Section Chapter 2: Nebuchadnezzar's dream of the multi-metal statue Chapter 3: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in the fiery furnace Chapter 4: Nebuchadnezzar's tree dream and madness Chapter 5: Belshazzar's feast and the writing on the wall Chapter 6: Daniel in the lions' den Chapter 7: Vision of the four beasts coming from the sea
Right. Anything beyond chapter 12 I believe is extra biblical.

You are correct about the language breakdown. Why is this significant?

Also, chapters 2-7 are a chiasm. 2 and 7 go together. 3 and 6 go together. And 4 and 5 go together. Can you explain how?
 
Right. Anything beyond chapter 12 I believe is extra biblical.

You are correct about the language breakdown. Why is this significant?

Also, chapters 2-7 are a chiasm. 2 and 7 go together. 3 and 6 go together. And 4 and 5 go together. Can you explain how?
Daniel chapters 2 through 7 form a chiastic structure which is an inverted parallel pattern where the themes of the outer chapters mirror each other as they move toward a central focus.
 
Daniel chapters 2 through 7 form a chiastic structure which is an inverted parallel pattern where the themes of the outer chapters mirror each other as they move toward a central focus.
Yes, I know what a chiasm is. I'm asking for your particular understanding of the chapters.
 
Cameron143
Daniel chapters 2 through 7 form a chiastic structure which is an inverted parallel pattern where the themes of the outer chapters mirror each other as they move toward a central focus. Many forms of literature use this literary device especially poetry.

I hear the term "extra biblical" often as issues arise that confront the fact there is no "one bible." The majority of the Christian world recognizes 73 books, the Protestant world 66. One of the most ancient continuous Christian societies have 81. The early church used as many as 12 books deemed inspired that were later deleted from the inspired list dictated by the Roman Church in 380 AD.

The number of English translations of the bible ranges anywhere from 50 major versions to roughly 900 total historical and modern editions. In many of these translations certain sects, denominations and non-denominationals rest their uniqueness on a single translation that fits there ancient theology handed down for the past 500 yrs. One of the greatest theological wars are based on the translation of 4 words.
 
Cameron143
Daniel chapters 2 through 7 form a chiastic structure which is an inverted parallel pattern where the themes of the outer chapters mirror each other as they move toward a central focus. Many forms of literature use this literary device especially poetry.

I hear the term "extra biblical" often as issues arise that confront the fact there is no "one bible." The majority of the Christian world recognizes 73 books, the Protestant world 66. One of the most ancient continuous Christian societies have 81. The early church used as many as 12 books deemed inspired that were later deleted from the inspired list dictated by the Roman Church in 380 AD.

The number of English translations of the bible ranges anywhere from 50 major versions to roughly 900 total historical and gmodern editions. In many of these translations certain sects, denominations and non-denominationals rest their uniquess on a single translation that fits there ancient theology handed down for the past 500 yrs. One of the greatest theological wars are based on the translation of 4 words.
How many books do you recognize as scripture?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Churchgoer