R
Nothing about this is simple. Do I have to study greek and hebrew in order to understand God? I have 3 children, none of them the same age as me. In the beginning was the Word. Was this another being apart from the Father? No! The Father is an INVISIBLE Spirit. The Word of that Spirit is the PHYSICAL manifestation of that invisible Spirit. When the Father spoke, the voice heard was Christ.
"Administrations" has an "s" at the end. That "s" makes it plural. There are different administrationS of God. But, there is only one God. Really people, who has time to argue with people who refuse the administrations of the Trinity.
the "s" i do agree,,,,two sets,,,,,the first set of events unfold and are a mirror image of the second,,,,after the first the second will appear. in the first set,the man of sin will rise,say he is Christ returned with his angels(fallen),,,and since the earth saw "war(s) and rumer(s) of war(s) and earthquake(s) in diver(s) place(s) they will assume the man of sin to be Christ in his second return,,,,,,
and then the second set of "s'es will unfold",,,,,,,,
I've read through some of the responses, and I can say that it is pain staking (to the point where my eyes begin to bleed) to see people cite verses, and offer no exposition of any sort. Cite a verse, offer no exposition of what's being communicated -- and people wonder why we Trinitarians are mistaken for Modalists.
But more towards your post, no, it's not a requirement to understand Greek and Hebrew. But I would say that in order to accurately understand what the authors of the NT are communicating, then I would argue that it is essential to study that author's style of writing.
John 1.1b does not say, “the Word was in God,” nor does it say, “the Word was God’s,” rather, the preposition πρός (“pros”) is used -- “the Word was with God.” And not only was the Logos “with” God, but because the preposition πρός is followed by a noun in the accusative case, this indicates that the Logos was existing simultaneously in a personal side-by-side, or face-to-face communion with God (c.f. John 1.29, 1.42, 1.47), not as an attribute inhering within Him.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning.
Your complete ignorance of what Christians teach and believe is why you are so confused. Christians do not believe in "gods" or "trinities of gods".Do U BELIEVE JESUS IS A GOD ! SO PROVE IT ! U BELIEVE IN A TRINITY OF GODS ! THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT ? ARE THEY ALL GODS ? PLEASE ! DON'T SAY 3 = 1 BECAUSE IT'S NOT EVEN LOGICAL ! u're Brother ! let talk peacefully ! if u have the truth show it ! ^^
Iamsoandso,
I am greatly sorry for any misunderstandings. I was talking about the different administrations/operations of the Godhead when others were denying such.
1Co 12:4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.
1Co 12:5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
1Co 12:6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.
But, I do agree with you that, at least, some will believe the antichrist to be christ. God bless!!!
I've read through some of the responses, and I can say that it is pain staking (to the point where my eyes begin to bleed) to see people cite verses, and offer no exposition of any sort. Cite a verse, offer no exposition of what's being communicated -- and people wonder why we Trinitarians are mistaken for Modalists.
But more towards your post, no, it's not a requirement to understand Greek and Hebrew. But I would say that in order to accurately understand what the authors of the NT are communicating, then I would argue that it is essential to study that author's style of writing.
John 1.1b does not say, “the Word was in God,” nor does it say, “the Word was God’s,” rather, the preposition πρός (“pros”) is used -- “the Word was with God.” And not only was the Logos “with” God, but because the preposition πρός is followed by a noun in the accusative case, this indicates that the Logos was existing simultaneously in a personal side-by-side, or face-to-face communion with God (c.f. John 1.29, 1.42, 1.47), not as an attribute inhering within Him.
So God the Father (seperate being) has no voice or "vocal chords" so to speak, but there was always another being who had the Father's "vocal chords" called the Word?
Just listen and use good old common sense as again, Christ is simple.
So who named Him the "Word"? His co-eternal Father? And when He spoke was it just a word, but not THE WORD that have life within it?
Now the Father is Spirit (one being and i guess can't speak) along with a co-eternal Son (the Word) and the Holy Spirit, which again just like THE WORD, is a seperate spirit being altogether?
Confusion, lol.
I cannot tell you what either trinitarianism or modelism is by definition.
I can tell you that it is these labels that divides us like gangmembers, though! But the truth is that the same force will kill and make alive both!
Are you seriously saying that what you wrote was what you gathered from what GraveBeUntoYou said? Would you gather the same from me if I were to say that the Word spoke things into existence by His own power?
Confusive indeed![]()
Yes. The Word had it's own power but Jesus received His by the Father?
The Father is a Spirit snd God but is AND is not the Son or HS.
The Son is God but is and not the Father or the HS.
The HS is obviously a Spirit, but again not the Father (who is Spirit too) or the Son, in ONE GOD?
Confusion.
Father is not the Son who is not the Holy Spirit. But they all three are one God.
If the Father was the Son, then the Son is not the Son but the Father, there would be a vain description of Jesus praying if He was the Father. But the Father is a different person higher than the Son, but they both have equal divinity as God Almighty.
Yes. The Word had it's own power but Jesus received His by the Father?
The Father is a Spirit snd God but is AND is not the Son or HS.
The Son is God but is and not the Father or the HS.
The HS is obviously a Spirit, but again not the Father (who is Spirit too) or the Son, in ONE GOD?
Confusion.
So there are 3?
Your complete ignorance of what Christians teach and believe is why you are so confused. Christians do not believe in "gods" or "trinities of gods".
1) The bible says there is only one God.
2) The bible says "The Father" is God.
3) The bible says Jesus is God.
4) The bible says Holy Spirit is God.
So if there is only one God with three persons called God, we call that the trinity.
Jesus were a prophet of God.
God is only one.God does not have any son or daughter.He is above such things.He sent prophets in this world to guide the human beings.so, there came many prophets in the world to guide the human beings.These prophets asked people to worship only one God.