Do you even believe in God?
Or, you believe God used the Bang that ultimately led to evolution?
Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?
- Thread starter pittsburghjoe
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Do you even believe in God?
Or, you believe God used the Bang that ultimately led to evolution?
You don't understand what retrocausality is. I'm saying history was put in place instead of physical actions.
God isn't bound by time. But God created time and specifically told us "when" man became a living soul.
He put us in time when He created because He wanted us in time.
None of you are getting what I've done here. We can shutdown anyone that brings up evolution from now on. This is ammo to wake the sleeping.
B
Blackpowderduelist
Guest
Y'all still responding to this twattle?
Dude spouts utter heresy and don't get banned...or warned just allowed to continue, even after being corrected many times.
Dude spouts utter heresy and don't get banned...or warned just allowed to continue, even after being corrected many times.
I do understand what retrocausality is, it's the definition to explain {Accidents].
You are discussing time waves and lapses.
Next, everything is energy and even though it feels like my finger tips are hammering my keyboard, in reality it's my energy force cause the reaction of the energy of the keyboard to depress.
You're not a Believer in God at all.
New ideas can be scary, it's not a valid reason to vilify the guy that just handed you something capable of waking millions. But, oh right, be sure to be stuck in your ways and allow them to fry.
What pittsburgjoe is claiming here in plain English:
We are not experiencing life this very moment. This is a memory that happened Billions of years ago. Every day is not a new day but a replay of something that has transpired. And every once in awhile, a time wave or lapse will react and change the pattern. I've lit up some mighty creative bongs before, but i've yet to achieve the heights of this realm you're in Pitt Joe!
We are not experiencing life this very moment. This is a memory that happened Billions of years ago. Every day is not a new day but a replay of something that has transpired. And every once in awhile, a time wave or lapse will react and change the pattern. I've lit up some mighty creative bongs before, but i've yet to achieve the heights of this realm you're in Pitt Joe!
Then break your theory down to me in 4 sentences or less. Maybe I am missing something here.
Why would sin and retrocasuality have any attachments. You think miraculously a sin committed can disappear by your theory?
And this would have to go all the way back to sin in its particle form before connecting with humanity. Why else would you be using Retrocasuality then?
We are in a fallen reality started by original sin. God has control of the future and past. If you want a morality test you don't give humans direct evidence. You generate history of evolution up to Adam sinning.
And how does morality merge with natural selection, since natural selection is [murder]?
Adam has to be pure in original form. How does morality get to Adam by way of Natural Selection for Adam to be pure? Natural Selection makes Adam a murderer from original state of existence. And this is before Adam sins!
He says energy is sin... meaning God either has no energy or God has sin.
Like I said: he destroys his own arguments
Wrong. Man became a living soul as soon as God breathed the breath of life into his
earthly elements, but you deny that too, claiming man was not physical until the fall.