Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?
- Thread starter pittsburghjoe
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I think it was dust because there might not be atomic bonds. There might not be a need for them.
Are atoms more like 3D pixels? Can we teleport around? Does hot and cold exist? Entropy is about heat so maybe not.
What allows sin to happen? It will be qualities of this fallen reality.
Sin won't be possible in Heaven, that means it isn't going to be like what we experience right now. Satan had a claim on everyone here until Jesus. He had that claim because he runs this place. He stared the disorder in God's Kingdom that made sins possible.
- physical history
- physical uniqueness
- decoherence
- locality, your own time
- atomic bonds
- possible to kill
- self pleasure
- disorder, entropy, heat
- animal instincts
- scalar volumes
- knowledge of evil ..being able to tell the difference between good and evil
Sin won't be possible in Heaven, that means it isn't going to be like what we experience right now. Satan had a claim on everyone here until Jesus. He had that claim because he runs this place. He stared the disorder in God's Kingdom that made sins possible.
You do understand that even though you have defined the Realm of Sin from the perspective of quantum mechanics, that doesn't mean your reality, the Decoherent Reality, factually exists?
You are aware that if the Big Bang never happened, that means Science has described a Reality that does not exist?
So essentially, you're putting faith into a [Fairy Tale] defined by man, and then attempting to align that to the Word of God.
So technically speaking here, you've wasted months even gathering the data to propose this [Mythical Event]!
I prefer to deal with [Absolutes], not science fiction.
It's sad the way you can't handle anything new.
What allows us to be compatible with God?
God is perfect order, coherence.
Sin is disorder, decoherence.
God needs us to be orderly to be entangled with him.
You need coherent waves to quantum entangle.
Disorder is our knowledge of good and evil.
What allows us to be compatible with God?
- Ten Commandments
- Love, Entanglement
- Avoiding sin ..disorder, to not be reliant of this fallen place for happiness.
- Doing good acts
- Letting God work through us
- Orderly quantum coherence, Vector field
God is perfect order, coherence.
Sin is disorder, decoherence.
God needs us to be orderly to be entangled with him.
You need coherent waves to quantum entangle.
Disorder is our knowledge of good and evil.
THERE IS NO PROOF OF A BIG BANG!
Without P R O O F, how can you assume, direct, create, enforce, input tangents off of ""something"" that doesn't even exist?
If it DOES NOT EXIST, it cannot be a NEW IDEA because it has no REALITY to it.
You are building an assumption knowing the foundation required [Big Bang] NEVER HAPPENED.
What, you want us to pretend with you and play like this is make believe so let's create something that's impossible?
But it never did happen, so I do not need a way for something that never happened to not happen.
The Big Bang only exists in the minds of evolutionists. It's a non existing mythical event so evolution can be factual.
We don't have to ignore scientific evidence anymore. There is the thing called the CMB ..the big bang is in the history that worked backwards starting from original sin.
I love Science, I implore my best attributes with Mathematics and Engineering. Science has advanced humanity in its knowledge, how to think, how to formulate, how to hypothesis, how to conclude. Medical Science and Biology mixed with Chemistry has been a tremendous asset . All of the Sciences have been a [true blessing].
But their job is not to Assume God did anything. Their job is to discover How God did it or an alternative view. The [MYTHICAL Big Bang Theory] is 100% MYTH! It's a flat out LIE! It never happened. But then Evolution could never have happened without the Big Bang. So Science has implemented a LIE to claim evolution is fact.
Science cannot Prove God exists/does not exist, "so," they [LIED] about the Big Bang in order to prove the Non Existence of God!
Scientists will laugh in your face. The
Cosmic microwave background
is a thing. It says there was a Big Bang.
I'M SAYING IT DOESN'T MATTER!
Cosmic microwave background
is a thing. It says there was a Big Bang.
I'M SAYING IT DOESN'T MATTER!
It's not actually a Microwave background. It's the point where the Universe began growing and continues to expand. They can't even agree on the red/blue lines. And they're completely ignoring the RED LINE in our own MilkyWay that shortens the expansion to Millions of years instead of their MAKE BELIEVE 13.4 Billion years.
The big bang has absolutely nothing to do with biological evolution theories.
I'll bite here for a moment.
So, you believe adding retrocasuality to the History of Decoherence will reverse everything back to its original sinless format. That is your explanation of what accepting Christ ultimately means to YOU?
So, you believe adding retrocasuality to the History of Decoherence will reverse everything back to its original sinless format. That is your explanation of what accepting Christ ultimately means to YOU?
The BBT is 100% Astronomy agreed! But I have read Biology books that connects the matter on Earth to the Matter as a whole Universe. A type of Synergy. But then again and thank God, not all biologist follow Darwin's views.