King Charles is crowned king
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Since no one else has done this I would argue that he is too old. He is supposed to be a charismatic person that mesmerizes the whole world. The Antichrist is the ultimate snake oil salesman, but King Charles has been known for so many years and it would be impossible to give his image a makeover. I don't dispute any of the very clear references that align him with Biblical prophecy, only that I do not see him as a counterfeit to Jesus, that is what antichrist means, counterfeit anointed one.
When you talk about elites and FreeMasons then without a doubt King Charles is certainly the center of that group of world leaders, but I don't believe he will be the face of the Antichrist.
King Charles has lived a global soap opera since his birth about a royal family that has everything except Jesus Christ.
There can be no doubt that there are many references to him in the Book of Revelation that cannot refer to anyone else. However, that does not mean he will be the dictator in a one world government.
This is the problem with treating subjects like "who is the Antichrist" like they are third rail of the subway which you can't touch. As a result Christians do not understand that it is not a simple topic, it is complex.
There can be no doubt that there are many references to him in the Book of Revelation that cannot refer to anyone else. However, that does not mean he will be the dictator in a one world government.
This is the problem with treating subjects like "who is the Antichrist" like they are third rail of the subway which you can't touch. As a result Christians do not understand that it is not a simple topic, it is complex.
When Diana married Charles it was the biggest reality soap opera in human history. Elementary school teacher marries prince and lives happily ever after. But the Lord used that to pull the curtain back on the ugly side of this farce/fairy tale. At one point Charles was "the most eligible bachelor on earth". I think today it is hard for anyone to imagine that.
The late Queen, Elizabeth II, was a committed Christian who publicly confessed Jesus towards the end of her life. Charles has always been a bit odd. Tragically for the UK, the Royal Family has embraced Muslim nations. A lot of Christians see Islam as an "Abrahamic faith" when it is in fact a work of Satan. Muslims are already making waves about Christian preaching the gospel. It is pretty obvious that saying Jesus is God, is Lord and the only Saviour is highly offensive to the followers of a mass murdering paedophile. The Qur'an treats believers as second class citizens, to be tolerated at best and murdered at worst. And this is the nest of vipers that has been welcomed into the UK.
So no, Charles is not the antichrist. I would look for someone who merges the Roman Catholic, Jewish and Muslim religions together to form a world religion. Steps have already been taken towards that objective.
Wozza
This thread is kind of old news, but I was trying to catch up since hadn't been here for a while.
Seems silly that some peeps believe King Charles is the anti-christ, when its' literally in his job description/role to be the defender of the faith, and the head of the Church of England.
Yes the crown IS heavy, having seen the Crown Jewels in the Tower of London, it's not something you'd want to wear on your head everyday.
Jesus crown was a crown of thorns...but Jesus was actually anointed, he didn't need a golden crown. Everyone could see he had like this golden halo/aura about Him. In Bible times, Kings were anointed with oil, they weren't wearing crowns all the time.
I think maybe in the coronation ceremonies they still are, traditionally but wonder if it's just symbolism. For a true anointing, needs to be spiritual as well as physical. The oil needs to go all over from the top of your head to the tip of your feet, more of a drench than just a dab of oil. It was Mary Magadelene who anointed Jesus with oil/perfume, that cost all her wages, and it was meant to be always recalled that SHE was the one who did it. She also washed his feet with her hair and tears (must have had looong hair to do this)
Mary M was the one Jesus cast 7 devils out of, and the one about to be stoned for adultery. But Jesus famously said those without sin may cast the first stone, and when they walked away, Jesus said to Mary neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more.
I love that story. It shows God can forgive us anything, and he won't condemn us if we truly repent. As far as I know Mary M didn't keep on sinning, she had her life turned around all thanks to Jesus compassion and mercy.
@Charlesiii care to read. Don't need to comment, but just maybe give a reaction?
This thread is kind of old news, but I was trying to catch up since hadn't been here for a while.
Seems silly that some peeps believe King Charles is the anti-christ, when its' literally in his job description/role to be the defender of the faith, and the head of the Church of England.
Yes the crown IS heavy, having seen the Crown Jewels in the Tower of London, it's not something you'd want to wear on your head everyday.
Jesus crown was a crown of thorns...but Jesus was actually anointed, he didn't need a golden crown. Everyone could see he had like this golden halo/aura about Him. In Bible times, Kings were anointed with oil, they weren't wearing crowns all the time.
I think maybe in the coronation ceremonies they still are, traditionally but wonder if it's just symbolism. For a true anointing, needs to be spiritual as well as physical. The oil needs to go all over from the top of your head to the tip of your feet, more of a drench than just a dab of oil. It was Mary Magadelene who anointed Jesus with oil/perfume, that cost all her wages, and it was meant to be always recalled that SHE was the one who did it. She also washed his feet with her hair and tears (must have had looong hair to do this)
Mary M was the one Jesus cast 7 devils out of, and the one about to be stoned for adultery. But Jesus famously said those without sin may cast the first stone, and when they walked away, Jesus said to Mary neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more.
I love that story. It shows God can forgive us anything, and he won't condemn us if we truly repent. As far as I know Mary M didn't keep on sinning, she had her life turned around all thanks to Jesus compassion and mercy.
@Charlesiii care to read. Don't need to comment, but just maybe give a reaction?
King Charles is the brother of Epstein Pedophile “Prince” Andrew, and was very good friends with one of Britain’s most prolific pedophiles, Jimmy Saville. Very few more evil, and demonic families than the British royal family.
Hello! The acts of Parliament that many Christians in Britain find to be repugnant were signed into law by the Monarch, for example abortion. On the other hand the King of Monaco refused to sign abortion into law in his country. When the foundations are being eroded what can the righteous do? Pray I guess, pray for our nation, that happier, more righteous times will come. Pray for the Monarchs that they will govern wisely. God Bless All.
monaco does not have a king, but a prince. not signing abortion into law is proper. that would be the same as signing murder into law.
Yes you're right, a slip of the pen, the Prince of Monaco refused to sign abortion into Law because of his faith. The British Monarchs signed abortion into Law. As Jesus said, by their fruit you will know them. God Bless You
Would rather not know the whole furor over Andrew...not sure what can be done, the poor victim who spoke out, had to live with that for the rest of her life so ended it sooner.
The reason why we have jails/prisons etc is so sex offenders can be locked away so they can't hurt or prey on anyone else. The only things is, the taxpayers can't feed and house them forever so at some point they are released on parole and the victims live in fear that maybe they'd find them again and all those bad memories come flooding back.
This is what we do with sex offending cats and dogs...spay/neuter them, to stop them from harassing each other. Why can't that be done with humans who can't abide by morality. I dunno.
Jesus said if someone hurts the little ones/ causes them to sin its better a millstone be tied around their neck and be thrown into the sea.
It's a harsh verse but He said it. Check out Matthew 18:6
Women all know men like Andrew who can't keep it in his pants. We warn each other about them. We avoid being alone with them. We teach safety skills and how to say no, and warning signs and red flags. But we are powerless when the abuse happens behind closed doors, and the police do not believe us, saying well its your fault for being in that situation in the first place. Or it's your fault for being female. You seem to have a relationship with this abuser. You sort it out. Don't call us we've got other things to do. Gee thanks Police, great protection.
The reason why we have jails/prisons etc is so sex offenders can be locked away so they can't hurt or prey on anyone else. The only things is, the taxpayers can't feed and house them forever so at some point they are released on parole and the victims live in fear that maybe they'd find them again and all those bad memories come flooding back.
This is what we do with sex offending cats and dogs...spay/neuter them, to stop them from harassing each other. Why can't that be done with humans who can't abide by morality. I dunno.
Jesus said if someone hurts the little ones/ causes them to sin its better a millstone be tied around their neck and be thrown into the sea.
It's a harsh verse but He said it. Check out Matthew 18:6
Women all know men like Andrew who can't keep it in his pants. We warn each other about them. We avoid being alone with them. We teach safety skills and how to say no, and warning signs and red flags. But we are powerless when the abuse happens behind closed doors, and the police do not believe us, saying well its your fault for being in that situation in the first place. Or it's your fault for being female. You seem to have a relationship with this abuser. You sort it out. Don't call us we've got other things to do. Gee thanks Police, great protection.
Hello Lanolin,
Perhaps if all 'Christian' national leaders had the same moral perspective as the Prince of Monaco then that would not be possible. IMHO the issue seems to be that having 'Christian' values as a 'Christian' politician seems to be the exception rather than the rule. God Bless You
yello
I decided to read all 18 pages of this, I have posted at various points in this thread but am somewhat limited in my knowledge of world affairs. I don't claim to know everything.
I have a few questions for ZNP. After all, I started the thread Spare just to get a handle on what the Royal family are saying about themselves.
At various points you mention a statue of King Charles with wings. Where is this statue? Could you post a picture? I don't live in the UK so I wouldn't know too much about it. I do know there is a giant statue called the Angel of...somewhere near the motorway in the North of England.
There are lots of statues of Queen Victoria everywhere.
There has been a statue of Princess Diana meant to memorialise her holding hands with two (unknown) children. I have always wondered who the children were in the original photo where she wore a skirt that was see-through (at the time, she didn't think anyone would see through it) at the Kindy she was working in. I have tried to find the names of these children, a boy and a girl, and what they remember or say about her now they are grown up. Just for my own curiousity really. They would be in their early 50s by now I reckon.
When the Bible says in the prophecy about the anti-christ/the man of perdition (correct me if I am wrong) not regarding women, do you think this could be interpreted to the modern day fact that we know Prince Charles did not prize Diana when they got married. She really had second thoughts once she found out about Camilla. Many many people were saying 'Don't do it, Di!' meaning it was the wrong idea to marry him.
She ended up having bulimia, tried to kill herself by throwing herself the stairs, pregnant with the heir to the throne Prince William. Is he not now 'The Black Prince' as you put it, since he's inherited the title. Diana would never become Queen, and she knew it. Camilla has that title now.
We know Prince William beat up Prince Harry when he was growing up, and still beat on him when he married Meghan, and is not talking to him at present because Harry is only a 'spare'. Prince William's wife Catherine (or Kate, as she used to be known) has had issues with her health, and as well as having to battle cancer, it seems she might have suffered bulimia as well, she had got so thin and seemed to diminish once she got married. Not just having babies, and being morning sick as a lot of women are, but seriously not being able to eat properly. It must be so stressful being married to the heir to the throne, and bearing his children, and never knowing quite how they are going to turn out.
You have stated several times that you believe Charles is a 33rd degree mason. But what about his sons? How do we know he is one? What about the various male world leaders. Are they all masons too?
The islamic connection - how do we know Charles has converted to Islam? Princess Diana was curious about it, read up about it, even went out with two muslim men, and seriously thought about marrying Hasnat Khan, before she took up with Dodi, who perished with her in the car crash. As well as the driver. The only survivor was the bodyguard, Trevor Rees, and he does not remember anything about the crash.
I think this is all for now.
Oh also I do recall when Princess Diana died in 1997, various people claimed she fuffilled prophecy, but it wasn't Biblical prophecy, they were talking about Nostradamus. Do you place any significance on the prophecies of Nostradamus, or is he another false prophet?
I decided to read all 18 pages of this, I have posted at various points in this thread but am somewhat limited in my knowledge of world affairs. I don't claim to know everything.
I have a few questions for ZNP. After all, I started the thread Spare just to get a handle on what the Royal family are saying about themselves.
At various points you mention a statue of King Charles with wings. Where is this statue? Could you post a picture? I don't live in the UK so I wouldn't know too much about it. I do know there is a giant statue called the Angel of...somewhere near the motorway in the North of England.
There are lots of statues of Queen Victoria everywhere.
There has been a statue of Princess Diana meant to memorialise her holding hands with two (unknown) children. I have always wondered who the children were in the original photo where she wore a skirt that was see-through (at the time, she didn't think anyone would see through it) at the Kindy she was working in. I have tried to find the names of these children, a boy and a girl, and what they remember or say about her now they are grown up. Just for my own curiousity really. They would be in their early 50s by now I reckon.
When the Bible says in the prophecy about the anti-christ/the man of perdition (correct me if I am wrong) not regarding women, do you think this could be interpreted to the modern day fact that we know Prince Charles did not prize Diana when they got married. She really had second thoughts once she found out about Camilla. Many many people were saying 'Don't do it, Di!' meaning it was the wrong idea to marry him.
She ended up having bulimia, tried to kill herself by throwing herself the stairs, pregnant with the heir to the throne Prince William. Is he not now 'The Black Prince' as you put it, since he's inherited the title. Diana would never become Queen, and she knew it. Camilla has that title now.
We know Prince William beat up Prince Harry when he was growing up, and still beat on him when he married Meghan, and is not talking to him at present because Harry is only a 'spare'. Prince William's wife Catherine (or Kate, as she used to be known) has had issues with her health, and as well as having to battle cancer, it seems she might have suffered bulimia as well, she had got so thin and seemed to diminish once she got married. Not just having babies, and being morning sick as a lot of women are, but seriously not being able to eat properly. It must be so stressful being married to the heir to the throne, and bearing his children, and never knowing quite how they are going to turn out.
You have stated several times that you believe Charles is a 33rd degree mason. But what about his sons? How do we know he is one? What about the various male world leaders. Are they all masons too?
The islamic connection - how do we know Charles has converted to Islam? Princess Diana was curious about it, read up about it, even went out with two muslim men, and seriously thought about marrying Hasnat Khan, before she took up with Dodi, who perished with her in the car crash. As well as the driver. The only survivor was the bodyguard, Trevor Rees, and he does not remember anything about the crash.
I think this is all for now.
Oh also I do recall when Princess Diana died in 1997, various people claimed she fuffilled prophecy, but it wasn't Biblical prophecy, they were talking about Nostradamus. Do you place any significance on the prophecies of Nostradamus, or is he another false prophet?