K
Kerry
Guest
So I am to explain to my rehab congregation why a man would name his son Ahaziah and another man named his son the same. They will look at me like I lost my biscuits.
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jason, can you not see that the Lord indeed cares about His word? He finished it around AD 100 long before there was an English language. It is a serious heresy to substitute any human translation for the Ipsissima verba of God. What you are doing is liberal.
You cannot prove that the KJV is the exact perfect Word of God.
No, that's silly. How can it possibly destroy his argument when he makes the exact same point four verses later? The deletion (or rather, the removal of the later addition) has simply to do with what the earliest manuscripts say, and has no theological 'agenda' or even impact on the rest of the text. Worth pointing out that there are other readings that are different even more, and instead of "walk after the Spirit" say "do not walk after the flesh". Clearly, the additions are taking their cues from v. 4.
Paul did not stop talking between Romans 7 and Romans 8. Read Romans 7 and keep Romans 8:1 in mind.
K
Kerry
Guest
You know what yall are missing the point. The Ahaz thing is also in the Norse gods and holds true in Greek mythology. Guess what, people don't care. That's what were are all about right is people. I meant they really don't care about Ahaziah or Jereboam in fact they really don't care about king David. Your are debating a mute point and it means nothing. I meant who gives a rodents rearend.
The jot & the tittle refer to Hebrew letters. English was not invented yet. Translations change jots & tittles a lot, because translation is inexact. A Christian can hear God speaking through an English translation, but it is imperfect.
If you care that much, why don't you study to show yourself approved, starting with learning the jots & tittles of Greek & Hebrew?
No you have not, & you cannot.
And one reason why you cannot, is that the Bible never mentions any KJV!
No. OSAS Proponents quote this verse without the words "walk after the Spirit. "
That's kind of the point.
I have spent a lot of time studying those chapters. And Rom 7 doesn't say "Walk by the Spirit."
And what Paui dictated to Tertius had not one English word in it.
The No Condemnation is absolute as Rom 8 goes on to indicate. Who is he who condemns?
When Paul gave out Romans, he included not even one English word in it at all.
Repent of substituting a human translation for God's true word.
Now if you are one of those who demotes the Lord Jesus to a "chance-giver," instead of the only & sufficient Savior, I urge you to repent & to trust Him to save you, trust Him with your eternal destiny.
I would call myself an OSAS person. I don't see what the fuss is about walk after the Spirit, especially seeing as Paul uses that phrase later anyway.