MY brother, there is nothing holy about the Hebrew language and in fact Jesus spoke Aramaic. If you go back to Genesis they all spoke one language. What that language is we do not know.
Aramaic was the beginning, huh?
MY brother, there is nothing holy about the Hebrew language and in fact Jesus spoke Aramaic. If you go back to Genesis they all spoke one language. What that language is we do not know.
Apparently I'm the only one that it misled.
Aramaic was the beginning, huh?
It's not about a language. I meant if you are Spanish you can't read the word or Swahili all of the foreign translations come from the King James. The king James has been translated into untold languages.
I don't do videos, I don't have the trime and my speakers don't work
So eyewitness testimony is always right?
So the science of archaeology is totally irrelevant?
It's also available on DVD. If you have an amazon visa card you can rack up points and get it for free.
Either that, or you can request it at your local library.
Jason, do you realize that thus far you have given no reason to believe that the KJV is the prefect word of God?
And do you realize that when the Word of God was given, it was over about AD 100, long before any English language.
And do you realize that it is a big sin to exalt any human work to the status of God's infallible word?
The KJV is a human translation.
Actually, the bigger sin is to potentially shatter the faith of a believer who trusts the KJV as the divinely inspired Word of God by deceiving them into thinking it has errors in it. ...
I have no regard for the faith of the believer, do I get the boot
No, I have already provided three major reasons that are backed up by Scripture. Here is that post again.
Is the King James Bible Infallible? - Theology Online | Christian Forums & More
Here is another post of mine (or thread that I started), titled, "Defending 1 Word of God (KJV) using Scripture.
ECT Defending 1 Word of God (KJV) using Scripture! - Theology Online | Christian Forums & More
So if you helped to turn the KJV-only proponent away from Jesus because you convinced them their were errors in it, then that wouldn't bother you?
Do you not see the answer to your own question...you seek righteousness but for them that can learn the truth I will do it
Your avoiding the question. Would it bother you?
So if you helped to turn the KJV-only proponent away from Jesus because you convinced them their were errors in it, then that wouldn't bother you?