that sounds like the best way not to spread the virus.uh
what
Nobody is going to go near someone who STINKS.
that sounds like the best way not to spread the virus.uh
what
Nobody is going to go near someone who STINKS.
Uh, I'd have to disagree there! It's God's "law." How unwholesome can it be? Wishy-washy "do what your heart desires" preaching is more to blame. God said don't do it, so I don't! I look at it more as God's instructions to me to holy living; how to walk before a holy God.The preaching of the law as oppose to the good wholesome preaching of the grace of God in Christ Jesus. "Thou shalt not" 3 of the most powerful incentives to the human flesh to sin that there were.
Another one bites the dust; this time it's Perry Stone.
https://julieroys.com/investigations-televangelist-perry-stone-sexual-misconduct/
Anyone care to make a wager on how long it'll be till he's back on the airwaves and hawking his merchandise? (If he leaves at all)![]()
I'm in agreement with you there...Justbyfaith...I respect your being right in how we should be with His help. How sinning is one thing we should NEVER get comfortable with.
He is supernatural and all powerful, able to make us sufficient in all ways...
but...
that doesn't mean we are not susceptible to human error. We will always need His Guidance and Grace, we will alway be in the process of growing in Him, praise be to Him!! Praise the Lord, He will present us blameless one day, but that won't be because we in and of ourselves are.
Just my opinion.
I'm not so sure it would. It might stop some of it, but many sex offenders are married, with families of their own; the last people you'd suspect. It's an unfortunate truth that many sex offenders marry and have children so they can molest them. The problem isn't celibacy, it's lust and sexual perversion.
We are all sinners.
Being inappropriate from the woman's perspective may be completely innocent from the man's perspective...
Those who are born again cannot sin (1 john 3:9).We are all sinners.
If I give someone a hug and the woman to whom I give the hug was molested as a child and therefore she takes that hug the wrong way as though I were making sexual advances to her, it does not change the fact that I hugged her innocently.Any minister of Jesus Christ who doesn't have enough sense to know what's inappropriate from a woman's perspective doesn't have any business teaching God's word. If he doesn't have the good sense to discern what's appropriate in this world, why should he be trusted with spiritual matters.
Thanks for your insight. I could not agree more. Ask King David how useful the law is.The preaching of the law as oppose to the good wholesome preaching of the grace of God in Christ Jesus. "Thou shalt not" 3 of the most powerful incentives to the human flesh to sin that there were.
Not true. The spirit man does not sin, but the flesh still exists and is still able to sin. We do not have to sin, but that is not the same thing.Those who are born again cannot sin (1 john 3:9).
I mean church leadership and sexual misconduct. All you have to do is check The Roys Report and pretty much every day there's a new story about someone getting busted. It's getting so the Catholic church has nothing on Evangelicals.
My thoughts on what's behind this situation: Internet pornography. It used to be fear of exposure and the financial hit of purchasing pornography kept it in check to a certain degree. Now anyone in complete privacy can watch virtually anything they want free.
In my opinion this should be priority number one for the church. If it's not addressed, a lot more people are going to get hurt and a lot of people's faith will end up shipwrecked.
1 John 1:8-10Those who are born again cannot sin (1 john 3:9).
If I give someone a hug and the woman to whom I give the hug was molested as a child and therefore she takes that hug the wrong way as though I were making sexual advances to her, it does not change the fact that I hugged her innocently.
There may be extenuating circumstances in the life of any woman wherein she may perceive something innocent as being predatory.
I think that it is being overly sensitive to consider that every woman was molested as a child and therefore I should not give a hug to women in the church; that woman needs to get over her sexual hang-ups and realize that a hug given innocently from brother to sister has nothing sexual in its nature. Her perception that it does would be based on something that is practically almost unique to her; and to not even give side-hug to women in the church would be a prohibition of expressing phileo love to a sister.
We re commanded not only to hug brothers and sisters but to greet one another with a holy kiss. Now, we don't do that today because a kiss is considered to be sexual in nature in today's society; but to give a side-hug to a sister is an expression of phileo love and ought not to be prohibited; even though a woman who has been abused may indeed take such a thing the wrong way
What if you see the elephant poo in your pyjamas??
I dont think people can keep it private if its the elephant in the room, someone is bound to SMELL the elephant poo sooner or later.
I think you are wrong, if you go after sin armed with the law [thou shalt not lust] which actually is what people do the incidents of lust will become rampant and that also is what is happening.I said that mostly tongue-in-cheek. I just mean if we're going to get excited about one issue in the body of Christ today, this should be it. It's a silent epidemic. By that I mean the underlying problem is mostly silent. No one want to address the real issue: men who have lust issues and no self-control.