Yes. But remember, Paul also recommends remaining alone to better serve. However, If the believer cannot remain he or she is free to remarry, but only in the Lord.If the unbelieving spouse leaves, the believing spouse is free to marry again?
Yes. But remember, Paul also recommends remaining alone to better serve. However, If the believer cannot remain he or she is free to remarry, but only in the Lord.If the unbelieving spouse leaves, the believing spouse is free to marry again?
I find this interesting, because that is not what Jesus said. Paul is actually going back to the Old Testament. Jesus was much more strict.Yes. But remember, Paul also recommends remaining alone to better serve. However, If the believer cannot remain he or she is free to remarry, but only in the Lord.
even if there is abuse and a threat to the wife and children?
If the unbelieving spouse leaves, the believing spouse is free to marry again?
Though to just be real about it I believe most cases of this are just exaggerated or bald-faced lied about.
You disagree with Paul? Paul said it was fine.Absolutely not, for that is still adultery and the name of God will be blasphemed and mocked by the heathen.
Go to her father? We are not living in the 1st century.Obviously there shouldn't be abuse, but they should try to work it out and the abusive party should you know, stop the abuse. Though to just be real about it I believe most cases of this are just exaggerated or bald-faced lied about.
Nevertheless, though rare it be in actuality, let us take this hypothetical further and say that the husband be an unbeliever and therefore unwilling to settle this issue with his wife privately and civilly. Then the answer here would be for the wife to go to her father and make known this matter and show him solid proof of the wounds of her abuse since of course the father gave her away in marriage to begin with and is the guarantor of her side of the contract.
You disagree with Paul? Paul said it was fine.
Go to her father? We are not living in the 1st century.
one of our daughters has an MSW and is now head of the agency she began working for over a dozen years ago when she was still in school.
domestic violence is, sadly, very real. she doesn't talk about it much, but when she still lived with us, there were days she came home with a tearstained face. it's terrifyingly real, and becoming more so.
Read the whole verse. But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.Paul did not say that the committing of adultery is correct. Paul explicitly states that remarriage is adultery. Furthermore Paul recommends to not associate with fornicators and adulterers since they be without the body of Christ (excommunication).
Read the whole verse. But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people.
By your standard there are very few Christians in the world.Exactly. This is what excommunication is. Therefore anyone that remarries after divorce while their spouse is still alive is an adulterer, they are excommunicated from the body of Christ and stand in jeopardy of damnation to the hellfire. No real Christian is to company with, facilitate, uphold, defend, or aid them in the commission of their grievous sin in any way whatsoever so that the name of God be not blasphemed and mocked heavily as it is today.
By your standard there are very few Christians in the world.
I fully agree with you. God does not join together all marriages. This was true for my disastrous first marriage that lasted 6 1/2 miserable years before ending in the summer of 1984. Worst mistake of my life and I paid the price.Not sure about this. God doesn't approve of all marriages (many argue here remarriage may be sin). God also may not approve of marriage to nonChristians or non-born again Christians. Bible gives a long list of people we should stay away from...from drunks, liars, fools, etc. I think people put themselves together not God in these cases.
What if the father is dead? An abused wife doesn't have to prove anything to anybody. The only one the abused wife needs to talk to is a divorce lawyer. The abusive husband needs to go to jail too. This is being real about it. Where do you come up with that the father is the guarantor of the contract? That is truly bizarre.Obviously there shouldn't be abuse, but they should try to work it out and the abusive party should you know, stop the abuse. Though to just be real about it I believe most cases of this are just exaggerated or bald-faced lied about.
Nevertheless, though rare it be in actuality, let us take this hypothetical further and say that the husband be an unbeliever and therefore unwilling to settle this issue with his wife privately and civilly. Then the answer here would be for the wife to go to her father and make known this matter and show him solid proof of the wounds of her abuse since of course the father gave her away in marriage to begin with and is the guarantor of her side of the contract.
I guess that I don't qualify either.By your standard there are very few Christians in the world.