I suppose being in two places ast one time would not fall under the heading of God's work?
Ok lets look at this rationallyThe point stands. You said it has been proven false, yet we have an example in scripture. Regardless of the quantifiable evidence, we have evidence nonetheless. If you see it once, it means its been done. Ergo, not proven false.
Sorry if I am coming off forward, and it really might be silly to be this adamant about surviving a snake bite, but God does the impossible, and divinely protects His saints. This cannot be denied.
Off the top of my head, the single word hell for various uses of the afterlife of non-believers, Satan, and his minions.Blind faith? I have been defending the KJV for many years through personal study. All so called errors can be cleared up through comparing Scripture to Scripture.
I suppose being in two places ast one time would not fall under the heading of God's work?
He does not realise the english language alone does not allow for a perfect translation without putting in alot of work, in reality, it would be twice as long and not a word for word translation. Because far to many greek words can not be tranlated by one english word, proven by the fact we have all the transliterations.Off the top of my head, the single word hell for various uses of the afterlife of non-believers, Satan, and his minions.
Ok lets look at this rationally
For it to be proven correct, you would have to prove no christian has ever been killed by those things, which you can not do, because we know this is not true.
All i have to do is show that not every christian has been spared. Which history shows is true.
You showed an example of 1 person. 1 does not equal all. You should know this and for you to say it proves me wrong, that is sad.
You have not proven anything, you gave one example to show you may be right, it takes much more than this because this fors far beyond one example,
The example you showed would be true whether the last part of mark was written or not, it was signs of the apostles. Which is spoken of in many other areas.
You will have to enlighten me. I missed the part about go forth and raise the dead.I don't believe it means all of them have to have never been killed by a snake. It means that such situations would come to pass, as testimony to the truth of His word. Its like saying that Christians would raise the dead, or something. Yes, they will, but it doesn't mean every single Christian is going to raise a dead person, speak in tongues, prophesy, or what have you.
You will have to enlighten me. I missed the part about go forth and raise the dead.
I remember reading some book about a guy who had a dream one night that he went on a missionary trip healing the sick and then woke up. In coming months or something, he ended up going on a missionary trip (to a place he has never been) and when he arrived the people said, "Welcome back." Let your mind work that one out.![]()
No, not more importantly. What biblical evidence supports what you just claimed?More importantly, if the Lord guided you to, would you have enough faith to carry out the good work?
Off the top of my head, the single word hell for various uses of the afterlife of non-believers, Satan, and his minions.
No, not more importantly. What biblical evidence supports what you just claimed?
It does not say this, that would be adding to the wordI don't believe it means all of them have to have never been killed by a snake. It means that such situations would come to pass, as testimony to the truth of His word. Its like saying that Christians would raise the dead, or something. Yes, they will, but it doesn't mean every single Christian is going to raise a dead person, speak in tongues, prophesy, or what have you.
It does not say this, that would be adding to the word
Mark 16:17 And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons;they will speak with new tongues; 18 they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.”
It say they (those who believe, meaning anyone who believes) will, it does not say they might, or in This case maybe this will happen or some will some will not,
It says they will (not might) cast out demons
They will (not might) speak in tongues
They will (not might) take up serpants and drink poison and it will by no means harm them
They will (not might) lay hands on the sick
And the sick will (not might) be healed
I have to take word for what it says bro, if it is the word, if it is inaccurate, i must reject it as being part of the word.
I believe it to be added by a scribe and not inspired by God and certainly not written by Mark. Thoughts?
They will and did, and do though, no?
Why do you assume every single believer has to do these things (as if its a list that needs ticking off to validate the individual)?
Miracles have happened from the beginning of time why should i think that will changePeople do cast out devils. People do speak in tongues. People do get bitten and not die. People do lay hands on the sick and they do get healed. Every single one of the things you listed has occurred in church history.
I am just taking the word for what it says, i can not understand why you can not take a word you think is inspired as written, and are willing to change the passage to make it appear to be correct?I don't understand your interpretation that necessitates that a believer meet all of that criteria. God's word says that your son's will prophesy. Have all of our sons prophesied, young men had visions, and old men dream dreams? Some have, yes. It is speaking to what will occur through believers. It doesn't mean a believer will do all of those things.
Off the top of my head, the single word hell for various uses of the afterlife of non-believers, Satan, and his minions.
What amuses me is that God Himself, with all His power, can not keep and protect His Written Word from being corrupted by man.
Or, at least, some would argue............
View attachment 193413
Everyone whoever believed did and or continues to do these things? No my friend this is not true
I do not assume anything, the text says they will you would have to assume they will does not mean they will, in order to make it say something else
Miracles have happened from the beginning of time why should i think that will change
The passage says the ONES who believe WILL, it does not say some of them will, or they might.
Why do you ignore this? And continue to judge me for wanting to take the passage literally for what it says, especially since you think it is inspired?
I am just taking the word for what it says, i can not understand why you can not take a word you think is inspired as written, and are willing to change the passage to make it appear to be correct?
You do not need this passage to prove miracles happen.
Satan isn’t in hades or hell right now. Hell is empty. Hades, where all the dead not saved by grace are, has an exponentially growing population. Hell is the eternal darkness and the lake of fire where the unsaved will go after judgement. There’s no distinction in the KJV. The word for everlasting only applies to the chains on the fallen angles yet KJV uses everlasting and eternal vs ages and other descriptors of the passage of time.Please explain. Hell is not Satan's dwelling place. Satan does not want to go to hell. Hell is a real place of fire and torment. See Luke 16.
Hell is so harsh, let's use hades or sheol...less harsh.