Was it a "gut feeling"? Why would God not want Jesus crucified? It had to happen since God ordained it from eternity.Christs' judgement before the governor.
Was it a "gut feeling"? Why would God not want Jesus crucified? It had to happen since God ordained it from eternity.
A vision from God to prevent the crucifixion?It was a dream, per what's written, and I don't have any cause to doubt her word.
She doesn't say, don't condemn Jesus. She says, have nothing to do with Him - Matthew puts this in context of Pilate sitting as judge. It is reasonable that she meant then, do not have anything to do with judging Him, whether to condemn Him or release Him. Immediately before this one has the impression Pilate meant to dismiss the charges, knowing that He has been arrested for envy, not for any crime - but then hearing from his wife he puts the decision in the hands of the Jews, washing his own.
Given these things i have no cause to believe her dream was anything but a vision from God, putting the bloodguilt of God on the Jewish people, rather than on Rome, just as scripture had said, "Me, whom THEY have pierced"
A vision from God to prevent the crucifixion?
The Jews could not kill Jesus. The Romans stripped them of their authority.No. To put the condemnation in the mouth of the Jews instead of Pilate.
he spoke to the crowd and gave them the decision, and they said "His blood be on us and our children" - - I think the warning of the dream was to move Pilate not to be the one who made the judgment. He tried to persuade them not to condemn Jesus, but "could not prevail" and he washed his hands.
The Jews could not kill Jesus. The Romans stripped them of their authority.
They did using Roman law.Ye men of Israel...Jesus Christ of Nazareth...Him...ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain (Acts 2:22-23).
The Jews could not kill Jesus. The Romans stripped them of their authority.
Ye men of Israel...Jesus Christ of Nazareth...Him...ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain (Acts 2:22-23).
Whose hands are the wicked hands?
Not quite. If you consider the scriptures that Christ would be crucified, determined from the foundation of the world, and that Jews AND Gentiles would be responsible, then it would follow that THE DEVIL, (through Pilates' wife) was attempting to negate the scripture of what God determined to be done.A vision from God to prevent the crucifixion?
Satan would not want Jesus crucified. It was the end of him.Not quite. If you consider the scriptures that Christ would be crucified, determined from the foundation of the world, and that Jews AND Gentiles would be responsible, then it would follow that THE DEVIL, (through Pilates' wife) was attempting to negate the scripture of what God determined to be done.
It still worked out bringing his guilt when he could have prevented it.Yes. That is why it had to be them, not Pilate, who made the choice, in the way it happened. Politically they could not execute anyone. Prophetically it had to be them who had the bloodguilt. So Pilate washed his hands, his wife warned him not to be Christ's judge, and the people chose to crucify Jesus rather than Barnabas.
The point to note is that Pilate's wife recognized that Jesus was a righteous man. "A just man" means a righteous man. It is noted by some that she was actually a believer.She doesn't say, don't condemn Jesus. She says, have nothing to do with Him...
It still worked out bringing his guilt when he could have prevented it.
Reread the Question! Stop all this nonsense and speculations, and give proper responses, rightly divided, from scripture to what was being asked.
To be fair this is the Bible DISCUSSION forum.Reread the Question! Stop all this nonsense and speculations, and give proper responses, rightly divided, from scripture to what was being asked.