More about Israel.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sounds more like Washington DC for the last 50 years than Israel!

Sounds a lot more like Jerusalem to me:

Revelations 11: ...the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Also it sounds like 70 AD.

Mark 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Apostate Israel was called a Harlot many times in the OT:

Jeremiah 3:6 The Lord said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.
7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
 
Sounds a lot more like Jerusalem to me:

Revelations 11: ...the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Also it sounds like 70 AD.

Mark 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Apostate Israel was called a Harlot many times in the OT:

Jeremiah 3:6 The Lord said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.
7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
God is still home in Jerusalem and is still protecting the IDF there as shown in the series 'Against All Odds' 2011 mini-series. Lk 21:20 yes armies will try again to wipe-out Israel, but do they succeed....NO.
 
Sounds a lot more like Jerusalem to me:

Revelations 11: ...the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Also it sounds like 70 AD.

Mark 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Apostate Israel was called a Harlot many times in the OT:

Jeremiah 3:6 The Lord said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.
7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
Yet Jesus suffered and died outside the city gates - not in Jerusalem.

Hebrews 13:12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.

John 19:17 And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha:

Luke 23:33 And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left.

Leviticus 16:27 And the bullock for the sin offering, and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the holy place, shall one carry forth without the camp; and they shall burn in the fire their skins, and their flesh, and their dung.
 
  • Pray
Reactions: dkontner
Sounds a lot more like Jerusalem to me:

Revelations 11: ...the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.

Also it sounds like 70 AD.

Mark 13:30 Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Apostate Israel was called a Harlot many times in the OT:

Jeremiah 3:6 The Lord said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.
7 And I said after she had done all these things, Turn thou unto me. But she returned not. And her treacherous sister Judah saw it.
8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
If you dig deeper, recent many decades of DC is related to jewrusalam.
Who do you think is the beast?
 
If you dig deeper, recent many decades of DC is related to jewrusalam.
Who do you think is the beast?

I think that the beast that comes out of the sea (the Mediterranean sea) is Rome, and the beast that comes out of the land (looks like a lamb, speaks like a dragon) is Jerusalem.
His 2 horns are the last 2 high priests.
We are also told much detail about the Roman kings.

Revelations 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

At the time John was writing 5 Roman kings had fallen since the birth of Christ: Julius Cesar, Augustus Cesar, Tiberius Cesar, Caligula and Claudius.
One is: Nero Cesar.
The other is not yet come: Galba, who reigned for only 7 months, and thus "continued a short space".

After that the Roman Empire disintegrated into civil war and chaos and was by all appearance dead.
Following the civil wars, the 8th beast Vespasian (69-79AD) "miraculously" arose, and founded the Flavian dynasty.
It was under his son Titus that Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Beast who John was not at liberty to name in person is Nero Cesar.
The number of his name is found when transliterating "Neron Cesar" into Hebrew letters, and adding up the numerical values of those letters.
 
  • Love
Reactions: HeIsHere
I think that the beast that comes out of the sea (the Mediterranean sea) is Rome, and the beast that comes out of the land (looks like a lamb, speaks like a dragon) is Jerusalem.
His 2 horns are the last 2 high priests.
We are also told much detail about the Roman kings.

Revelations 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

At the time John was writing 5 Roman kings had fallen since the birth of Christ: Julius Cesar, Augustus Cesar, Tiberius Cesar, Caligula and Claudius.
One is: Nero Cesar.
The other is not yet come: Galba, who reigned for only 7 months, and thus "continued a short space".

After that the Roman Empire disintegrated into civil war and chaos and was by all appearance dead.
Following the civil wars, the 8th beast Vespasian (69-79AD) "miraculously" arose, and founded the Flavian dynasty.
It was under his son Titus that Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Beast who John was not at liberty to name in person is Nero Cesar.
The number of his name is found when transliterating "Neron Cesar" into Hebrew letters, and adding up the numerical values of those letters.
when you say jewrusalum is the harlot, you meant the past? Or modern days?
The harlot is riding on the beast? Shouldn't them be in the same time frame? They work together.

I feel the beast is in modern days.
 
The verse below is very clear that the land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people in the past, present, and future. This is not symbolic and it is certainly not referring to non-Jews who are Christians.
Ezekiel 37:21-26 -

This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will take the Israelites out of the nations where they have gone. I will gather them from all around and bring them back into their own land. I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel. There will be one king over all of them and they will never again be two nations or be divided into two kingdoms. They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their sinful backsliding and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God.

“‘My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd. They will follow my laws and be careful to keep my decrees. They will live in the land I gave to my servant Jacob, the land where your ancestors lived. They and their children and their children’s children will live there forever,
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
The verse below is very clear that the land of Israel belongs to the Jewish people in the past, present, and future. This is not symbolic and it is certainly not referring to non-Jews who are Christians.
Ezekiel 37:21-26 -

This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I will take the Israelites out of the nations where they have gone. I will gather them from all around and bring them back into their own land. I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel. There will be one king over all of them and they will never again be two nations or be divided into two kingdoms. They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their sinful backsliding and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God.

“‘My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd. They will follow my laws and be careful to keep my decrees. They will live in the land I gave to my servant Jacob, the land where your ancestors lived. They and their children and their children’s children will live there forever,
"They will no longer defile themselves with their idols and vile images or with any of their offenses, for I will save them from all their sinful backsliding and I will cleanse them. They will be my people, and I will be their God."

That's the important part.

In ot, every time when God mentions blessings, all is under God's wings. Example Joshua 1, psalm 91....
 
I think that the beast that comes out of the sea (the Mediterranean sea) is Rome, and the beast that comes out of the land (looks like a lamb, speaks like a dragon) is Jerusalem.
His 2 horns are the last 2 high priests.
We are also told much detail about the Roman kings.

Revelations 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

At the time John was writing 5 Roman kings had fallen since the birth of Christ: Julius Cesar, Augustus Cesar, Tiberius Cesar, Caligula and Claudius.
One is: Nero Cesar.
The other is not yet come: Galba, who reigned for only 7 months, and thus "continued a short space".

After that the Roman Empire disintegrated into civil war and chaos and was by all appearance dead.
Following the civil wars, the 8th beast Vespasian (69-79AD) "miraculously" arose, and founded the Flavian dynasty.
It was under his son Titus that Jerusalem was destroyed.

The Beast who John was not at liberty to name in person is Nero Cesar.
The number of his name is found when transliterating "Neron Cesar" into Hebrew letters, and adding up the numerical values of those letters.
When Octavian defeated Mark Anthony and Cleopatra (after Julius Caesar death), he renamed himself Augustus ('the revered'), and declared himself Emperor, and established the Roman Empire. This was the end of the Roman republic and the start of the Roman Empire.

Augustus Caesar 29BC - 14 AD

The commencement of the Roman Empire coincided with the birth of Jesus Christ.

Luke 2:1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.
2 (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
6 And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.
By having Julius Caesar as your first King you are re-writing history to fit your Preterist view.
And I hear you say "but what about Josephus ?" its the go to proof for Preterist :)

The name "Julius" does not appear in the New Testament, and it does not appear in Josephus’ Wars of the Jews either. As in Mark and Matthew, Wars only uses Caesar as a royal title, never connecting it to the "Julius" that supposedly gave it such great importance.
 
Yes you can say that.
But dig deeper, it is spiritual battle between good and evil, God and devil.
Speaking of spiritual battles, I have noticed a lot of secular people are waking up to the idea that the only thing that makes sense of world events today is a spiritual battle - which is hopefully the start of a good thing - awareness wise ?
 
  • Heart
Reactions: Larry73
Speaking of spiritual battles, I have noticed a lot of secular people are waking up to the idea that the only thing that makes sense of world events today is a spiritual battle - which is hopefully the start of a good thing - awareness wise ?
Really? I didn't see that in secular world. But i hope so.
 
When Octavian defeated Mark Anthony and Cleopatra (after Julius Caesar death), he renamed himself Augustus ('the revered'), and declared himself Emperor, and established the Roman Empire. This was the end of the Roman republic and the start of the Roman Empire.

Augustus Caesar 29BC - 14 AD

The commencement of the Roman Empire coincided with the birth of Jesus Christ.

Luke 2:1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.
2 (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)
3 And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city.
4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)
5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.
6 And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered.
By having Julius Caesar as your first King you are re-writing history to fit your Preterist view.
And I hear you say "but what about Josephus ?" its the go to proof for Preterist :)

The name "Julius" does not appear in the New Testament, and it does not appear in Josephus’ Wars of the Jews either. As in Mark and Matthew, Wars only uses Caesar as a royal title, never connecting it to the "Julius" that supposedly gave it such great importance.

Yes I was wrong about the time of Julius Cesar.
Wikipedia says he was dictator of Rome from 49 to 44 BC.
John did not claim that the first beast was present at Jesus birth however, that was my mistake.

I understand that you interpret those passages into a different historical context than that.
Would you be able to provide us with any detail on the identities of the beasts and kings?