Before attacking
@BetterCallPsalms do some real research, you have no clue concerning the Geo-politics/Economics of the near east. Have you ever read any in-depth analysis of any of the peace negotiations, no you say, yes that is obvious.
With regards to the dating of the Book of Revelation...
Internal evidence makes it clear that the book was written prior to 70 AD.
The statement by Iranaeus is not without controversy and open to interpretation.
Your appeal to Clement of Alexandria does not support a later dating either.
This quote Clement of Alexandria (150-220 AD), once again assumed into the text as to who the tyrant is.
"And to give you confidence, when you have thus truly repented, that there remains for you a trustworthy hope of salvation, hear a story that is no mere story, but a true account of John the apostle that has been handed down and preserved in memory. When after the death of the tyrant he removed from the island of Patmos to Ephesus, he used to journey by request to the neighboring districts of the Gentiles, in some places to appoint bishops, in others to regulate whole churches, in others to set among the clergy some one man, it may be, of those indicated by the Spirit.
(“Who is the Rich Man that shall be Saved?”, Section 42)"
_________________________
There remain several other historical sources worth noting that attest to a pre-70 date for Revelation.
The Syriac History of John, the Son of Zebedee (6th c.) and both Syriac versions of the Apocalypse (6th c., 7th c.) explicitly refer to John’s banishment by Nero.67 Arethas (A.D. 6th c.? 9th c.?), furthermore, taught that the book was written before A.D. 70, and understood it to be largely predictive of the Roman siege on Jerusalem.
See discussion in A. R. Fausset, Revelation in Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown, A Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments, vol. 2 (Hartford, CT: Scranton, n.d.), 548.