You do realise it was the "12 angry Democrats" that stated they could not find evidence of collusion right?
Mueller report finds no collusion but doesn't exonerate Trump on obstruction.
- Thread starter MessageOfTheCross
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You do realise it was the "12 angry Democrats" that stated they could not find evidence of collusion right?
What you said is true, just as a finding of not guilty is not necessarily a declaration of innocence. The optics are favorable for the president though in the short term and will probably bump his favorable approval rate up a couple points. It will take years for the presidential historians to decide to exonerate or eviscerate him.
No, I was not aware of this but agree wholeheartedly with you that they should all be voted out of office.
You need to get more T:
© Getty Images
President Trump on Sunday lashed out on Twitter at special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, referring to the "13 Angry Democrats" on the probe and writing that they should have been working to investigate Hillary Clinton controversies.
The Sunday tweet comes as the president has expressed anger and frustration about the FBI's use of an informant in its investigation of Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. Trump and his allies have claimed the use of the informant was an act of politically motivated espionage.
"Why didn’t the 13 Angry Democrats investigate the campaign of Crooked Hillary Clinton, many crimes, much Collusion with Russia?" he tweeted. "Why didn’t the FBI take the Server from the DNC? Rigged Investigation!"
Trump has used the "13 angry Democrats" term to refer to people on Mueller's probe who he believes are biased against him.
The president, most recently, sent a pair of tweets Saturday night lashing out at those members and casting doubt on Mueller's investigation into reported ties between Trump's campaign and Moscow.
"This whole Russia Probe is Rigged. Just an excuse as to why the Dems and Crooked Hillary lost the Election and States that haven’t been lost in decades. 13 Angry Democrats, and all Dems if you include the people who worked for Obama for 8 years. #SPYGATE & CONFLICTS OF INTEREST!" Trump wrote.
I have never used Twitter or follow the tweets. I will say that Trump is a master of the tweet and has used it to his great advantage.You need to get more T:
© Getty Images
President Trump on Sunday lashed out on Twitter at special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, referring to the "13 Angry Democrats" on the probe and writing that they should have been working to investigate Hillary Clinton controversies.
The Sunday tweet comes as the president has expressed anger and frustration about the FBI's use of an informant in its investigation of Russia's meddling in the 2016 election. Trump and his allies have claimed the use of the informant was an act of politically motivated espionage.
"Why didn’t the 13 Angry Democrats investigate the campaign of Crooked Hillary Clinton, many crimes, much Collusion with Russia?" he tweeted. "Why didn’t the FBI take the Server from the DNC? Rigged Investigation!"
A
AuntieAnt
Guest
Trump tweets directly to the public because he has no other choice. Rather than allow the biased news media to continually twist his statements, he keeps an open line of communication open for us citizens. Honestly, I'd rather hear directly from the President on Twitter than to hear some anchorperson's distorted version of what he says.
I agree with you because for Trump, the Tweets are directly from him to the people he serves delivered on a very timely basis without being filtered and sanitized first by others.
Google Downplays Searches for News of No New Indictments in Mueller Probe
Google search is hiding auto-completed text related to the Robert Mueller special counsel investigation, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.
Mueller's investigation has finished with no further indictments, the culmination of a story that has dominated the news for the better part of two years. But the most popular search engine is avoiding the topic.
Using Google search on multiple browsers and on private-browsing mode, the Free Beacon found Google search had an aversion to the search term "indictment."
Using either "Trump" or "Mueller" as the subject, the following word "indictment" was not suggested even after spelling out most of it. For example, putting "Trump indi" into Google’s search bar does not lead to "Trump indictment" but rather to "Trump India," "Trump India Pakistan," Trump India tariffs," and "Trump Indiana."
This problem did not occur with Google’s search engine competitors, Yahoo and Bing. Those search engines suggested news about the indictments when you typed in the related words.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/goo...-news-of-no-new-indictments-in-mueller-probe/
Google search is hiding auto-completed text related to the Robert Mueller special counsel investigation, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis.
Mueller's investigation has finished with no further indictments, the culmination of a story that has dominated the news for the better part of two years. But the most popular search engine is avoiding the topic.
Using Google search on multiple browsers and on private-browsing mode, the Free Beacon found Google search had an aversion to the search term "indictment."
Using either "Trump" or "Mueller" as the subject, the following word "indictment" was not suggested even after spelling out most of it. For example, putting "Trump indi" into Google’s search bar does not lead to "Trump indictment" but rather to "Trump India," "Trump India Pakistan," Trump India tariffs," and "Trump Indiana."
This problem did not occur with Google’s search engine competitors, Yahoo and Bing. Those search engines suggested news about the indictments when you typed in the related words.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/goo...-news-of-no-new-indictments-in-mueller-probe/
S
Susanna
Guest
S
Susanna
Guest
Oh really? Maybe I could change my VPN to Monaco and get that stinking rich (insert bad word describing an evil, sassy, no good woman) feeling when I’m flipping through the ads for luxury yachts
?
Trump Defenders Underestimate The Mueller Report By Touting No Indictments.
From Forbes:
The pro-Trump spin machine is out on the airwaves, touting that the just-completed Mueller Report recommends no new indictments.
For ten briefly-stated reasons, the Mueller action marks more of a beginning, than an end, to the search for wrongdoing in the Russia scandal.
First, there are very active continuing investigations. When special counsels complete their reports of their principal findings, that does not end the inquiries. Instead, the tasks for prosecutors and investigators are turned over to the continuing active investigations. In this instance, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has brought prosecutions already, like Michael Cohen’s, to build on. Matters within that U.S. Attorney’s broad jurisdiction will continue forward.
Second, it is pure spin to make the issue whether new indictments are in the report. Mueller may well think that the report should give an account of his findings. New indictments are not to be expected in a report on findings. Indictments come, when ready, from the grand jury, not in reports. Rather, indictments that are moving toward readiness would come out in the other investigations, like that of the SDNY.
Third, there is particular reason to expect evidence to come out about Trump and Russia. The former National Security Adviser, Michael T. Flynn, has pled to Mueller’s charges. But nothing further of what he knows has become public before now. There is every reason to expect that whatever limited Flynn evidence is revealed via Mueller's report, there will be further evidence at the highest level as Flynn becomes a witness for more forums.
Fourth, there are a host of witnesses whose cooperation can be expected from the pressures built up from the investigations. An example is Allen Weisselberg, the corporate finance officer who carried out Trump’s instructions within the Trump Organization.
In the immediate aftermath of Cohen’s testimony, it was clear than Weisselberg has not been cooperating, and that he knows an enormous amount of the wrongful things Trump ordered. The report by Mueller hardly marks an end for the pressure on Weisselberg to cooperate. That pressure will build both from prosecutors and from Congress.
bad news:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/charle...eport-by-touting-no-indictments/#6e28ef45529a
From Forbes:
The pro-Trump spin machine is out on the airwaves, touting that the just-completed Mueller Report recommends no new indictments.
For ten briefly-stated reasons, the Mueller action marks more of a beginning, than an end, to the search for wrongdoing in the Russia scandal.
First, there are very active continuing investigations. When special counsels complete their reports of their principal findings, that does not end the inquiries. Instead, the tasks for prosecutors and investigators are turned over to the continuing active investigations. In this instance, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has brought prosecutions already, like Michael Cohen’s, to build on. Matters within that U.S. Attorney’s broad jurisdiction will continue forward.
Second, it is pure spin to make the issue whether new indictments are in the report. Mueller may well think that the report should give an account of his findings. New indictments are not to be expected in a report on findings. Indictments come, when ready, from the grand jury, not in reports. Rather, indictments that are moving toward readiness would come out in the other investigations, like that of the SDNY.
Third, there is particular reason to expect evidence to come out about Trump and Russia. The former National Security Adviser, Michael T. Flynn, has pled to Mueller’s charges. But nothing further of what he knows has become public before now. There is every reason to expect that whatever limited Flynn evidence is revealed via Mueller's report, there will be further evidence at the highest level as Flynn becomes a witness for more forums.
Fourth, there are a host of witnesses whose cooperation can be expected from the pressures built up from the investigations. An example is Allen Weisselberg, the corporate finance officer who carried out Trump’s instructions within the Trump Organization.
In the immediate aftermath of Cohen’s testimony, it was clear than Weisselberg has not been cooperating, and that he knows an enormous amount of the wrongful things Trump ordered. The report by Mueller hardly marks an end for the pressure on Weisselberg to cooperate. That pressure will build both from prosecutors and from Congress.
bad news:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/charle...eport-by-touting-no-indictments/#6e28ef45529a
The author of the article showed the results of his search:This is what I got:
And my VPN is set to Seattle.
Google:
"trump indi"
"mueller ind"
Bing:
"trump ind"
Yahoo:
"mueller ind"
The article reveals the difference between Google search, Bing search, Yahoo search.
The guy is using the auto-fill/search in the search box - I can't say how accurate it is.
I suppose the author of the article is just pointing out that auto-fill is not reliable. kinda like spell checker.
U
UnderGrace
Guest
It is all coded language you know.....gematria, not the Hebrew kind this one is in English. People sit and wait and then they decode his post, figure out the hidden messages ... like how he is sending "Hillary to Gitmo"
The devil is in the details!
It is all coded language you know.....gematria, not the Hebrew kind this one is in English. People sit and wait and then they decode his post, figure out the hidden messages ... like how he is sending "Hillary to Gitmo"
The devil is in the details!
I think it's more like codeine, an opiate for the masses.
Bob Mueller Made America An Advent Calendar Filled With Indictments For Trump’s Campaign
https://halfwaypost.com/2018/11/10/...-filled-with-indictments-for-trumps-campaign/
Lol
https://halfwaypost.com/2018/11/10/...-filled-with-indictments-for-trumps-campaign/
Lol