NEW CC Perspectives on Levels of Conspiracy & Corruption in 2020 Election, CV19 & DS Existence

[Solemateleft]

Not a huge fan of a strategy that relies entirely on mass-defection; but if nothing else, maybe it at least keeps the IRGC paranoid.
I know exactly what the risks are; our government is going to blow bajillions of dollars on weapons that are retardedly expensive and largely unnecessary, and completely ignore and alienate the population; while the fear of China turns the US into China.
Neither China or Russia are actually on course to out-tech the United States.
What we actually need advanced AI for is sustainable fusion reactors; but there's not even a guarantee that AI can find the materials solutions we need; because they may not even exist.
You might as well try and say we need a moon-base with moon-trains, or the terrorists win. That's basically what you're saying.

Lol, it must be nice going thru life blissfully believing that you know everything, when in actuality you don’t even know what you don’t know…
You might be right in general, but it remains debatable as the do have their advantages – see below…

lol, speaking of things that are affected by intellectual disability : intellectually disabled... your use of Flawed Logic and reasoning is consistently aligned with Fallacies of Logic!~ in this case Your Terrorists Moon analogy argument is both a Strawman and Red Herring Fallacy of Logic!

Lol, HOWEVER, the context of my perspective is based upon Military Use and Applications of AI… As I am a Warfighter, Analysts, Planner and Strategist...

Lol, have you ever been to China? Besides having been to Hong Kong a few times, I was the CO of Troops on the first Amphibious Vessel that ported in Shanghai in decades back in the 90s… We hosted their military for tours and dog and pony displays on the flight deck and well deck of our equipment. Lol, they would put their scientists and engineers in uniforms and send them to blend in within their troops so that that could re-tour our amphibious ship and assault vehicles over and over… sure enough, they were able to replicate our amphibious assault vehicles years later…

Have you ever been to a Military Operations Research Symposium Special Session on AI with Experts on China and Russia? Well I have… like I said, this is one of my areas of expertise…
The difference between our approach and our Pacing Threat is that we are inclined to play by the rules of humanity to ensure the requisite checks and balances and guardrails – they are NOT… They are more willing to accept RISK, where we ARE NOT…

They have already infiltrated our Data in more ways than most can imagine, as demonstrated via the Declass Election Interference Data… Therefore, they have the means to plant Trojan Horses within our Data Sources…

Lol, it’s evident that you ONLY have access to Unclassified and Open Sources of materials from questionable sources. I have access to all levels of Department threat assessments that drive our current and future Defense Plans…

Here’s just a small sampling of information that debunks your flawed assumptions about their abilities…

Here is a summary of Chinese students attending US universities and their return/stay patterns.
1. Annual Numbers of Chinese Students in the US (Enrollment)
The number of Chinese students in the US grew dramatically from the early 2000s until peaking around 2018–2019, then declined due to COVID-19, geopolitical tensions, and visa issues. Data primarily comes from the Institute of International Education (IIE) Open Doors reports.
Approximate yearly figures (Chinese students enrolled in US higher education):

• 2000/01: ~60,000
• 2005/06: ~62,600
• 2010/11: ~158,000
• 2015/16: ~328,500
• 2017/18: ~363,000 (peak era)
• 2018/19: ~369,500 (all-time peak)
• 2019/20: ~317,000
• 2020/21: ~317,000 (COVID low)
• 2021/22: ~290,000
• 2022/23: ~289,500
• 2023/24: ~277,000–290,000 (slight recovery/stabilization)

Chinese students represented the largest foreign group for over a decade (roughly 30–35% of all international students in the US at the peak).
2. Return to China vs. Remain in the USA
This is harder to measure precisely because it depends on the time frame (immediately after graduation vs. 5–10 years later) and degree level.
Long-term Historical Picture (1978–2024)
According to China’s Ministry of Education:

• Cumulative total who went abroad to study since 1978: ~8.88 million
• Cumulative who returned to China: ~6.44 million
• Overall return rate ≈ 73% (some sources cite ~87% of those who completed their studies have returned in more recent decades).

The return rate has been significantly higher in recent years than in the 1980s–2000s.
Stay Rates in the US (Especially for Advanced Degrees)

• STEM PhDs (the group most studied): Historically very high stay rates.
  
  • 2000s–2010s: 85–90% of Chinese STEM doctoral graduates remained in the US long-term (5–10+ years after graduation).
  • Recent years (post-2020 data): Declining to around 76% or lower, according to analyses from Georgetown, Harvard, and CSET.
• Overall (all degree levels): The majority of undergraduate and master’s students traditionally returned to China, while PhD students were much more likely to stay.

3. Recent Trends (2020s)

• Return rates have increased (or intent to stay has decreased) due to:
  
  • Stronger Chinese government incentives (“Thousand Talents” and similar programs).
  • Geopolitical tensions, visa difficulties, and perceived hostility in the US.
  • Improved job opportunities and salaries in China’s tech/innovation sectors.
• Many recent analyses describe this as a partial “reverse brain drain.”

Sources

• IIE Open Doors Report (annual)
• China Ministry of Education (cumulative return statistics)
• Studies by Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), Georgetown University, and others on STEM PhD stay rates.

 

[Solemateleft]

Not a huge fan of a strategy that relies entirely on mass-defection; but if nothing else, maybe it at least keeps the IRGC paranoid.
I know exactly what the risks are; our government is going to blow bajillions of dollars on weapons that are retardedly expensive and largely unnecessary, and completely ignore and alienate the population; while the fear of China turns the US into China.
Neither China or Russia are actually on course to out-tech the United States.
What we actually need advanced AI for is sustainable fusion reactors; but there's not even a guarantee that AI can find the materials solutions we need; because they may not even exist.
You might as well try and say we need a moon-base with moon-trains, or the terrorists win. That's basically what you're saying.

part 2 of 3...

lol, of course you are not a huge fan of Strategy - given your history here of only being Fixated and Lost in the Tactical Day by Day Source along with your pension for Flawed Assumptions and Conventional Thinking and Reasoning in the Midst of the most Epic Unprecedented IRREGULAR WARFARE in HISTORY>>>>

China's areas of clear or significant lead over the United States in advanced technology (as of 2025–2026)
China does not lead in most foundational breakthrough technologies, but it has established clear advantages in several critical applied, manufacturing, and deployment areas. Here's a realistic, evidence-based assessment:
Areas Where China is Ahead or Has a Clear Lead

Rank	Technology Area	China's Advantage	Notes / US Position
1	Electric Vehicles (EV) & Batteries	Dominant in production, supply chain, battery technology (LFP, sodium-ion), cost	World leader in deployment and manufacturing. US lags significantly in scale.
2	High-Speed Rail	Operational experience, technology, and global export leader	No real US competitor
3	Hypersonics	More flight tests, broader range of operational systems	Generally considered ahead in fielded capability
4	5G/6G Infrastructure & Equipment	Largest 5G network, equipment (Huawei), patents, and early 6G research	US leads in some chip design but trails in deployment
5	Quantum Communications & Sensing	World's largest quantum communication network (Micius satellite, ground networks)	US leads in quantum computing hardware
6	Advanced Materials & Rare Earth Processing	Dominates refining, processing, and new materials research	Near-monopoly in supply chain
7	Solar PV & Renewable Energy Manufacturing	~80% of global solar manufacturing capacity	Dominant in production scale
8	High-Impact Research Output	Leads in 66–69 out of 74 critical technologies tracked by ASPI (high-impact papers)	Massive volume advantage in research publications
9	Advanced Robotics & Manufacturing Automation	Especially in industrial robotics and certain drone technologies	Strong and growing
10	Synthetic Biology & Genetic Engineering (recent gains)	Overtaken US in some high-impact research metrics	Rapidly closing gap

Other Notable Areas of Strength

• Drone technology (especially low-cost, swarming, and military applications)
• Rail transit technology (maglev included)
• Coal gasification and certain clean coal technologies
• Critical minerals processing and separation
• Certain segments of space technology (e.g., rapid satellite production and launch cadence)

Important Context and Nuance

• Research Volume vs. Quality: China leads in sheer quantity of high-impact scientific papers in most fields (per ASPI Critical Technology Tracker). However, the United States still leads in many highest-end breakthroughs, commercialization, top-tier talent, and fundamental innovation in areas such as:
  
  • Frontier AI models and algorithms
  • Semiconductor design & advanced chip manufacturing (especially <3nm)
  • Quantum computing (superconducting and trapped-ion approaches)
  • Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals
  • Aerospace engines and stealth technology
  • Software and systems integration
• China excels particularly in scale, manufacturing, deployment speed, and applied engineering.

 

[Solemateleft]

Not a huge fan of a strategy that relies entirely on mass-defection; but if nothing else, maybe it at least keeps the IRGC paranoid.
I know exactly what the risks are; our government is going to blow bajillions of dollars on weapons that are retardedly expensive and largely unnecessary, and completely ignore and alienate the population; while the fear of China turns the US into China.
Neither China or Russia are actually on course to out-tech the United States.
What we actually need advanced AI for is sustainable fusion reactors; but there's not even a guarantee that AI can find the materials solutions we need; because they may not even exist.
You might as well try and say we need a moon-base with moon-trains, or the terrorists win. That's basically what you're saying.

​

And We Know 9.15.26: Brennan TREASON Delta, Submission Complete, London’s domination ending, AI HOAX Bust, PRAY!​

Tuesday, September 15, 2026 13:35

 

[Solemateleft]

Ep 3993a - Did Bessent Just Signal That Warsh Is On The Same Page? Everything Is About To Change​

 

[Solemateleft]

Ep 3993b - Prepare For A [FF], Boomerang, Think [DS] Weapons, SC Gave USPS The Roadmap, Buckle Up​

 

[Solemateleft]

bump

M.A. Rothman​

𝐒𝐀𝐔𝐃𝐈 𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐁𝐈𝐀'𝐒 ‘𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐂 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐎’ 𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐄𝐃 𝐈𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓 — 𝐒𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐓𝐖𝐈𝐂𝐄
Five weeks ago, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey signed a pact meant to prove they no longer needed Washington. An armed attack on one, the text read, is an armed attack on all — commentators dubbed it an Islamic NATO. Pakistan’s own defense minister vowed that any spillover from Yemen would mean “𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘦𝘤𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭.” Nine days later, the world found out exactly what that meant.
On September 8, Houthi missiles and drones slammed into four Saudi cities, wounding 73 civilians and knocking out energy facilities. Two days later the Houthis seized Mokha, their biggest territorial gain since the 2022 truce. By Friday they’d taken Dhubab, crossed onto Perim Island, and grabbed the Greater and Lesser Hanish islands — 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐛 𝐞𝐥-𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐛 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭, the chokepoint carrying a tenth of the world’s seaborne trade. Yemen’s own deputy Presidential Leadership Council chairman, Tareq Saleh, admitted losing Mokha and said Iran had planned and backed the assault.
So what did the Mecca alliance actually deliver? A courier. Pakistan carried Riyadh’s plea to Tehran, asking it to rein in the Houthis — and Tehran’s answer was “𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴.” Two days later, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, Mohammad Mokhber, posted his own answer: “𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺, 𝘈𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘩.” A government that doesn’t control a militia doesn’t usually congratulate it by name.
Note what Riyadh did once its own treaty had answered with silence. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called President Trump twice as Mokha fell — the second time 𝐛𝐞𝐠𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐬. Trump said no, keeping U.S. forces focused on Iran and Hormuz, but sent intelligence and targeting support instead, and dispatched CENTCOM’s Adm. Brad Cooper to the kingdom for emergency talks. Two months earlier, in July, Riyadh had insisted it could handle the Houthis alone.
An alliance built on paper to replace American power just got tested by real bullets, and it produced nothing but a phone call nobody answered honestly. 𝐒𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐚’𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐩𝐢𝐩𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 was hit by drones from Iraq the same week, and Riyadh did nothing about that either — while American drivers watch gas prices climb with Brent crude. The Mecca pact still exists on paper. In practice, the only ally who picked up the phone and did something was the one country the pact was built to need less.
𝐅𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐬∗𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐝, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 — 𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩.

 

[Solemateleft]

Draining the DS Corrupt Judge Swamp simply takes time - it's all about the Right Time and Place and in accordance with a deliberate Plan in order to Optimize Results for Successful Outcomes...

Linda Traitz​

"A robe is not a participation trophy for recent naturalization. Lifetime power over immigration orders belongs to people whose first loyalty is the Constitution, not a political faith that has spent centuries ranking its own law above the host country’s.
Fast-tracking someone onto the federal bench and then watching injunctions rain down on border enforcement is how sovereignty gets vetoed by a courtroom."
Via @larry_mcwethy on X

 

[Solemateleft]

Not a huge fan of a strategy that relies entirely on mass-defection; but if nothing else, maybe it at least keeps the IRGC paranoid.

lol, just more proof of your pessimistic, flawed thinking, lack of understanding of this type of warfare, and blind-spot to REAL EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES that are actually WORKING...
lol, showing yet again that you are fixated on the Wrong Scoreboard at the Wrong Time!!!

lol, the IRGC is a lot more than Paranoid at this juncture... they are broke, hungry, running out of weapons and ammo, unable to provide for their families and isolated with all the People and surrounding Nations joining an Alliance AGAINST them...

While the IRGC would prefer to maintain their Rein of Terror and Control in the Straits - we are Happy to Help their EVIL SOUL's DIE as they CRY Praise Allah with their Last breaths!!!

 

[Solemateleft]

M.A. Rothman​

𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏: 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍'𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐌𝐄 𝐂𝐀𝐍'𝐓 𝐏𝐀𝐘 𝐈𝐓𝐒 𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐈𝐑𝐆𝐂
President Trump just made it official on Truth Social: the regime that spent months publicly refusing to blink is now the one asking for a lifeline. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘭, 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘢𝘥𝘭𝘺, Trump wrote, adding that 𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘜.𝘚.𝘈. 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘨𝘦 — 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰.
It’s not empty bluster. Iran’s own economy is cratering under the weight of the regime’s defiance — 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞, food prices have rocketed past 100 percent, and imports and exports have collapsed by roughly a third. Ordinary Iranians are watching their paychecks vanish before rent and groceries are even covered.
The pain has reached the regime’s own enforcers. Iran International reports the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other security units have now had salary payments delayed for the third time this year, with some personnel going unpaid for a second straight month. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐡 𝐜𝐚𝐧’𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐲𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥 — and morale inside the ranks is reportedly cracking.
This is the same regime that poured billions into H∗zbollah, the Houthis, and a ballistic missile program while its own soldiers went unpaid. Trump has spent months promising to 𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥 rather than rush back to the table — and the numbers coming out of Tehran suggest that strategy is working exactly as designed.
Now the mullahs want in — and Trump isn’t rushing to give it to them. He made clear the decision on whether to even engage is his alone, on his timeline, not Tehran’s. The regime that spent a year promising it would never negotiate under pressure is now the one running out of both money and time.
𝐀 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐞.