News? Where can I find real news?

[Pemican]

I stopped watching what the networks and cable called news years ago.
Just watched my local station's local news.
Well, last night their news cast was interrupted by some yoyo standing at a podium answering softball questions.
Hope this is not the new norm.

I like The Epoch Times. I find it an excellent source of real news. Here is a link:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/

 

[Magenta]

CNN, and her left wing sisters removed all decenters ( real journalist) many years ago.

Dissenters?

 

[KT88]

I like The Epoch Times. I find it an excellent source of real news. Here is a link:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/

Media bias Check Epoch Times:

Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA

World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

Source link:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/

 

[KT88]

Dissenters?

No he meant decanters as they were all getting drunk on the job lol

 

[DWR]

Media bias Check Epoch Times:

Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA

World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

Source link:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/

So where do you get your news from?

 

[KT88]

So where do you get your news from?

Wherever it's to be found.

 

[KT88]

The aim was to rank the publications by the least amount of bias with the most amount of reliability in their reporting.

The following 15 news sources ranked the highest under this metric.

1. AP, 79.2%
2. Reuters, 78.9%
3. Weather.com, 75.9%
4. ABC News, 73.9%
5. The Advocate, 73.9%
6. Bloomberg, 72.9%
7. National Public Radio, 72.9%
8. Wall Street Journal, 72.1%
9. The Hill, 72.1%
10. Financial Times, 71.9%
11. LA Times, 70.8%
12. PBS, 70.6%
13. Al Jazeera, 70.5%
14. CBS, 70.3%
15. Fortune, 69.8%

Full article:

https://towardsdatascience.com/how-statistically-biased-is-our-news-f28f0fab3cb3

 

[DWR]

The aim was to rank the publications by the least amount of bias with the most amount of reliability in their reporting.

The following 15 news sources ranked the highest under this metric.

1. AP, 79.2%
2. Reuters, 78.9%
3. Weather.com, 75.9%
4. ABC News, 73.9%
5. The Advocate, 73.9%
6. Bloomberg, 72.9%
7. National Public Radio, 72.9%
8. Wall Street Journal, 72.1%
9. The Hill, 72.1%
10. Financial Times, 71.9%
11. LA Times, 70.8%
12. PBS, 70.6%
13. Al Jazeera, 70.5%
14. CBS, 70.3%
15. Fortune, 69.8%

Full article:

https://towardsdatascience.com/how-statistically-biased-is-our-news-f28f0fab3cb3

It is obvious where this site's bias is.

 

[soberxp]

I stopped watching what the networks and cable called news years ago.
Just watched my local station's local news.
Well, last night their news cast was interrupted by some yoyo standing at a podium answering softball questions.
Hope this is not the new norm.

China Global Television Network，CGTN

 

[Lanolin]

Every news outlet has a certain bias.

The reason why we have FOUR gospels is because its from four different sources representing the four corners of the world, NEWS comes from North, East, West and South.

so you ought to have at least four channels or sources of news to get a complete picture. Dont just rely on one source to tell you.

 

[oldethennew]

in today's world, unless The Holy Spirit leads you to those who have the Truth directly from our Heavenly Father,
then it isn't really any kind of real/truthful news at all, just worldly babbling from bable...

 

[iamsoandso]

I stopped watching what the networks and cable called news years ago.
Just watched my local station's local news.
Well, last night their news cast was interrupted by some yoyo standing at a podium answering softball questions.
Hope this is not the new norm.

Get an ad blocker if it blocks it it's got no salt in it it's just click bait...

 

[JohnDB]

I have found that all news is always biased.

There's political agendas with all of them.
False dichotomies are set up to divert from the truth.
Kinda like the gun control debate.
Sure, both sides have truth to them but the sad fact is most gun related deaths and injuries are self inflicted. Both sides ignore the larger truth and it goes ignored. Same thing with the news media.

"Dog bites man" is not news...too common
"Man bites dog" is considered newsworthy.

It's all about targeting a specific demographic to tell them what they want to hear so they will flock to you so that you can sell advertising that wants to sell to that demographic.

Think in terms of feminine hygiene vs shaving cream vs toys.

What targeted group do you want to sell these products to...how can you tailor your news towards to attracting the viewership needed to sell these products?

 

[TheWaytoGo]

I stopped watching what the networks and cable called news years ago.
Just watched my local station's local news.
Well, last night their news cast was interrupted by some yoyo standing at a podium answering softball questions.
Hope this is not the new norm.

www.newscoup.com

 

[oldethennew]

in Yeshua's Holy Word-s...

 

[Lanolin]

Gospel according to Luke is my favourite.

Though the other three are pretty good sources, Lukes has the exclusive details about Jesus nativity.

 

[Lanolin]

hmm lots of babble on here atm

I have good news though.
my school is having free lunches this year.

although the bad news is the first meal it was something with peas, and I dont think the children liked the peas.

but the good news is that it might be something different tomorrow!

 

[posthuman]

The source you suggested has an obvious agenda---Anti Trump.
But so does every source mentioned---
Either anti trump or anti Bidden.

whether an article provides information that is favorable or unfavorable toward a worldly political figure is a stupid way to determine whether that source has a biased agenda.

 

[Nehemiah6]

whether an article provides information that is favorable or unfavorable toward a worldly political figure is a stupid way to determine whether that source has a biased agenda.

After four years of hate-filled propaganda from the mainstream media (which continues to this day) your remark is hypocritical at best, and self-serving at worst.

There are at least two-dozen conservative news sources that do not twist everything to fit a pre-planned agenda. They provide actual news and at the same time expose the hatred and violence of the Leftists.

The American media are worse than Pravda in its heyday. At least Pravda did not pretend that it was anything other than the propaganda mouthpiece of the Soviet Union. But CNN, NBC, ABC, CBC, BBC, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the National Review, the Boston Globe, and many others pretend that they are reporting news, when in fact they are spreading propaganda and BS. Even AP and Reuters are no better than propagandists Time, Newsweek, etc.

 

[Nehemiah6]

The aim was to rank the publications by the least amount of bias with the most amount of reliability in their reporting.

The following 15 news sources ranked the highest under this metric.

1. AP, 79.2%
2. Reuters, 78.9%
3. Weather.com, 75.9%
4. ABC News, 73.9%
5. The Advocate, 73.9%
6. Bloomberg, 72.9%
7. National Public Radio, 72.9%
8. Wall Street Journal, 72.1%
9. The Hill, 72.1%
10. Financial Times, 71.9%
11. LA Times, 70.8%
12. PBS, 70.6%
13. Al Jazeera, 70.5%
14. CBS, 70.3%
15. Fortune, 69.8%

THIS IS PURE LEFTIST BALONEY. THE ONES DOING THE RANKING THEMSELVES ARE BIASED LEFTWARD. THIS IS JUST LIKE ALL THE BOGUS POLLS IN THE LAST TWO ELECTIONS.