True
But they all were part of the roman empire, Just like Israel was.
But had any of them rcieaved a deadly wound and were in the pit when Rev.17:8 was written,the angel thinks so.
True
But they all were part of the roman empire, Just like Israel was.
The beast received a deadly wound, That happened when the empire crashed and become no more.But had any of them rcieaved a deadly wound and were in the pit when Rev.17:8 was written,the angel thinks so.
What is amazing is, From what I see, jerusalem was not playing the harlot with pagan Gods in Christs day
Instead she was playing religion with the pharisees and saducees.
Sadly, many churches today do this.. It does not make them any harlot
Did they deny jesus as their king or as their savior?in 1 Samuel 8 https://biblehub.com/interlinear/1_samuel/8.htm they ask for a king just like the other nations,,,then they denied Jesus as their king again...they still wanted the same thing as in 1 Samuel 8.
The beast received a deadly wound, That happened when the empire crashed and become no more.
I do not see how what happened when Rev was written has anythign to do with this, It is speaking of the world in the day and time the beast assumes power.
John is looking into the future, (not present) At the time he was looking at, It had recieved the mortal wound.In Rev. 17:8 it was in the pit and had already received the wound(past tense).
In Revelation 18:20 it says "for God has(past tense) avenged(again past tense) you on her" so let me ask you was Revelation 17:8 written after the destruction of Jerusalem or before? lol,or will you deny the tense in the Scriptues you yourself gave...
Did they deny jesus as their king or as their savior?
I think most in Israel wanted jesus as king, but he refused
John is looking into the future, (not present) At the time he was looking at, It had recieved the mortal wound.
That time has not happened yet..
And thanks, I finally see what your saying..lol
Yes, excuse meJohns not speaking in Rev.17:8 the angel is.
They already asked jesus to be king, He refused. And they knew it..so they turned on him.yes at his trial ,,,in Luke 19:38-42 and others.
They already asked jesus to be king, He refused. And they knew it..so they turned on him.
And I have shown numerous time He is the future roman emperor. He is the final roman ruler who will being to completion the time age of the gentiles. He is the feet of iron and clay. The fourth beast of Dan 7, The little horn, who comes out of rome
I can not fathom a jewish or islamic leader taking over rome. Nor does it make any sense.
AND lest we forget.....THE VICAR of GOD of the CATHOLIC church (last 3) have BOWED to and KISSED the KORAN <----this shows submission......the POPE will be the false prophet and he will POINT to the Muslim god and the Muslim MADHI as god when he begins to call down fire, work miracles and GOD sends delusion upon all lost menKinda the point of the thread. The Pope is getting MIGHTY buddy buddy with the Orthodox Jews, AND the Muslims.
Yes you did bro
You left the words ek esos “out from the middle”
I agree, Taken is the correct interpretation of the word. But leaving “out of the middle) out of the interpretation leaves it missaplied.
Thats greattwo things.....
a. Last three popes have bowed to and kissed the KORAN which shows submission
b. God sends strong delusion and ALL lost men WILL believe and accept the person as god
I have no problem seeing a POPE as the false prophet bow down to the Islamic leader
Sorry, I am not buying it, It makes no senseYEP and your missing the POINT....the word TAKEN is not applicable to the words out from the middle......
NOW pay attentionHAHAH
THE word Taken means-->Cause to be, to become, come into being, be assembled, brought to pass, arise
CAUSE to be out from the middle
COME into being out from the MIDDLE
ASSEMBLED out from the middle
ARISE out from the middle
Brought to pass out from the MIDDLE
HE rises in the MIDST of HUMANITY.........SATAN is holding the POWER UNTIL HE RISES OUT FROM THE MIDDLE OF HUMANITY
WE must use the actual definition of the word translated TAKEN to DEFINE the rest of the verbiage
JOHN states the same thing I just SAID in his words.....OUT OF THE SEA--->the BEAST rises <----the SEA OF HUMANITY
Thats great
We are not talking about the false prophet. But the final gentile world leader.
So the pope can do whatever he wishes, He still is not the roman king.
Sorry, I am not buying it, It makes no sense
We are talking about WHO is the one who restrains.
Imagine 1 group who wants to kill another group, and a powerful person in the middle restraining the group from doing anything, he is in the middle, and prevenyts the one group from doing any harm
Then imagine when that restrainer is removed, The group is no free to do whatever he wants with no restraint.
Then add that Satan enters that group and become its power.
This is what Paul is talking about. The antichrist is restrained UNTIL the one who restrains is TAKEN OUT OF THE MIDDLE, At that point, Antichrist will be free to do whatever he wants.
We are told through scripture that God is the one who holds this earth together, He only allows certain things, there will come a day when God pulls back his protective restraining hands, and all hell breaks lose, like it has never broken lose on earth before. Nor will after
(they call this the great tribulation)