The Presidential pardon power isn't limited by a law. It's absolute. This is clearly a separation of powers issue that Congress cannot limit with a law.It is basic law, you cannot use my signature on a legal document without me knowing and approving, otherwise it is fraud.
IMO, promises will be made and almost none will be kept and he will keep getting demonic spiritual help as he always seems to do.The different perspectives should be interesting.
Yes, and what about the Chief of Staff pardon power? Biden didn't sign himself and he wasn't even there when the autopen signed it. So, who authorized it to be signed? That is the question.The Presidential pardon power isn't limited by a law. It's absolute. This is clearly a separation of powers issue that Congress cannot limit with a law.
Well at least she conceded that those who worship Jesus at Lord should be going to Trump's rally and not hers.
Based on what? Tell that to my 401K which nearly doubled under his last term.I know you stand with Trump and I respect that but IMO Trump is the worst president in history.
IMO it is too soon to determine that. Now is the time to be praying for him, not judging his legacy.I know you stand with Trump and I respect that but IMO Trump is the worst president in history.
Once again, there is no requirement to "sign." The announcement in the press conference was sufficient to pardon. The Constitution doesn't specify how the pardons must be done, and Congress can't force any requirements (e.g. sign a paper document) on the Executive. The fact that there are signed pardons doesn't mean they are required.Yes, and what about the Chief of Staff pardon power? Biden didn't sign himself and he wasn't even there when the autopen signed it. So, who authorized it to be signed? That is the question.
Sure, a Prison warden will release a prisoner because he heard someone say there was a press conference. Your credibility just hit 0, the only way to recharge that is with a government law that says what you just said. Also, why not include the law that says the President is allowed to pardon people for future crimes they might commit or be charged with as well as past crimes.Once again, there is no requirement to "sign." The announcement in the press conference was sufficient to pardon. The Constitution doesn't specify how the pardons must be done, and Congress can't force any requirements (e.g. sign a paper document) on the Executive. The fact that there are signed pardons doesn't mean they are required.
Sure, a Prison warden will release a prisoner because he heard someone say there was a press conference. Your credibility just hit 0, the only way to recharge that is with a government law that says what you just said. Also, why not include the law that says the President is allowed to pardon people for future crimes they might commit or be charged with as well as past crimes.
Hopefully that will work out.Time will tell but I don't think it looks good further down the road.Based on what? Tell that to my 401K which nearly doubled under his last term.
Of course this power is limited: to that of the President himself.The Presidential pardon power isn't limited by a law. It's absolute. This is clearly a separation of powers issue that Congress cannot limit with a law.
So not just anyone in the Whitehouse with a bag of white powder can issue a pardon. But what about the pardon itself, can they issue golden pardons to be used at ant time in the future?Of course this power is limited: to that of the President himself.
Not his staffers running the autopen.
Bribem was not of sound mind thru any of this BTW.
He was clear and lucid in the press conference he gave announcing the pardons, including details. There were certainly times when he wasn't, this just isn't one of them.Of course this power is limited: to that of the President himself.
Not his staffers running the autopen.
Bribem was not of sound mind thru any of this BTW.