Sounds like what John 146 Is saying Is,In the old testament,the faith used was our faith and required action but the faith used In the new testament Is CHRIST faith and Is already perfect.
Bingo! Thanks for simplifying it for me.
Sounds like what John 146 Is saying Is,In the old testament,the faith used was our faith and required action but the faith used In the new testament Is CHRIST faith and Is already perfect.
Now the question you need to ask yourself is "Can I will myself to not walk after the flesh?".
I like this question, because I think it goes to the heart of what we are as people and in relationship to the Father.
The law or rules are concepts defined in words outside ourselves which we can talk about.
We are built for relationship and communion with others and with the Lord. It is these things that drive our hearts and our walk. Jesus is saying if you have communion with me, your heart in my heart, then the commandments are followed but not out of will but out of relationship. At the centre what is the point of the commandments if they do not support and construct the relationships that we rely on. What we are hurt it is these things we want to break and tear up.
You cannot will yourself into a relationship, you can discover and participate in one. So when people say, "You are being self righteous" it is a language that does not fit. We walk in things of God because that is His and our way, it is the relationship and who we are. Faith is trust and belief in Jesus, that His words are true, that He does represent the Lord and has saved us.
The idea we are keeping score or saying I am saved, opps no I am not, is just game playing. When you know what love is it is the foundation of your life, you are hurt when you get it wrong, and want to put things right and grow some more.
So to get back to OSAS, this is just from people who have yet to fully walk with the Lord and see His real love and grace flowing through their lives.
I like this question, because I think it goes to the heart of what we are as people and in relationship to the Father.
The law or rules are concepts defined in words outside ourselves which we can talk about.
We are built for relationship and communion with others and with the Lord. It is these things that drive our hearts and our walk. Jesus is saying if you have communion with me, your heart in my heart, then the commandments are followed but not out of will but out of relationship. At the centre what is the point of the commandments if they do not support and construct the relationships that we rely on. What we are hurt it is these things we want to break and tear up.
You cannot will yourself into a relationship, you can discover and participate in one. So when people say, "You are being self righteous" it is a language that does not fit. We walk in things of God because that is His and our way, it is the relationship and who we are. Faith is trust and belief in Jesus, that His words are true, that He does represent the Lord and has saved us.
The idea we are keeping score or saying I am saved, opps no I am not, is just game playing. When you know what love is it is the foundation of your life, you are hurt when you get it wrong, and want to put things right and grow some more.
So to get back to OSAS, this is just from people who have yet to fully walk with the Lord and see His real love and grace flowing through their lives.
Are you saying In the statement above that since Christ had not died on the cross for our sins and made atonement for us yet,that no old testament saints were saved?
You tell me, were they "saved" like we know salvation? Were they absent from the body, present with the Lord? Were they made a new creature in Christ? Were they given the seal of the Holy Spirit? Were they born again? Were they considered sinless in Christ?
All I'm saying is they were not "saved" the way we know salvation. They had to have faith in whatever it was that God had given them to believe and then obey it. If they listened and obeyed, they ended up "safe" in Abraham's bosom until Christ died, He would preach the gospel to them and would lead the captives free. But hear what I'm saying, salvation is and always be through the shed blood of Jesus Christ. How His blood is applied to people in various dispensations may vary.
Sounds like what John 146 Is saying Is,In the old testament,the faith used was our faith and required action but the faith used In the new testament Is CHRIST faith and Is already perfect.
I understood what you were saying but I need clarity on,how was a person saved In the old testament If they used their own faith In action.
Isn't It still faith by grace In the old testament.
I just don't want to go Into error.
I just happened to stumble across this on gotquestions.org and it sounds similar to what you are saying:The OT saints at the time did not experience salvation like you and I. When God had a message for man, God would use a spokesman. God would give His message to the spokesman, in turn, the spokesman gives God's message to the intended audience. Those living in the OT economy had to listen to God's chosen spokesman in order to know His expectations for humanity. If man did not listen to God's spokesman, he did so at his own risk. If he did listen and obey, he was placed in Abraham's bosom upon death. For example:
Noah preached about a coming flood. If you had been on earth when Noah warned others about a flood, what would you have done? You would have either listened to God's spokesman, took action, and entered the ark; or you would have rejected the message. Eight persons entered the ark, including Noah. Eight persons were saved through the flood.
Throughout time, whatever God's message would be, man's responsibility was to believe the message and obey. Today, after the resurrection, man only has to believe the gospel of Jesus Christ. This is our obedience.
I tend to think more along the lines of what covenant are we in. We are currently in the New Covenant based on the death and resurrection of our Lord. His blood redeemed us. Thank you Jesus!
So what do you think about those that claim the OT saints were looking forward to the cross? Some wrote prophecy about it, but the cross was hidden was it not?
I think the OT people were looking to God with the understanding that they had at the time. The disciples were told 17 times that Jesus was going to die and they still didn't get it. They were looking for a "conquering" Messiah not the "suffering" One first.
None knew about Jesus Christ per se although they did know that they were serving people in the future. They knew someone/something was coming but as to the specifics - I would say no, they did not know but they sure know all about it now though since Jesus came and got them and then brought them to heaven to be with Himself and the Father...
1 Peter 1:10-12 (NASB)
[SUP]10 [/SUP] As to this salvation, the prophets who prophesied of the grace that would come to you made careful searches and inquiries,
[SUP]11 [/SUP] seeking to know what person or time the Spirit of Christ within them was indicating as He predicted the sufferings of Christ and the glories to follow.
[SUP]12 [/SUP] It was revealed to them that they were not serving themselves, but you, in these things which now have been announced to you through those who preached the gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven—things into which angels long to look.
I think if people understood this, it would clear up all the debates about salvation and works. My point, and you may disagree, is after the church is raptured, God is dealing with the nation of Israel once again and will once again require them to have faith and demonstrate their faith through works to endure the tribulation to make it to the Millennium. Eternal salvation is not necessarily at stake. This is why I believe that James' audience is the nation of Israel in the time of Jacob's trouble. Matthew and James lines up together because they both have in mind the kingdom of Christ on earth. Can you see my point?
I haven't looked into the coming dealing with the nation of Israel. I know that the Lord will be faithful to them in what He has said He would do concerning them. The Lord has me focusing in on Christ and what He has accomplished in the New Covenant.
Personally I think as much about the coming millennium reign of Christ on this earth as I wonder about what the ant population in Africa is. I know that both are real but are not in any way associated with my life in Christ now on this earth.
Personally I think every scripture has to be viewed with the "intention" of the writer and who are the people being talked to at the time the letter was written. James was written to the 12 tribes scattered abroad. These 12 tribes consisted of Jewish believers in Christ and some that did not believe. The term "brethren" is used by both Paul and Peter when they were addressing other Jews in Acts and in the book of Hebrews too whether they believed in Jesus or not.
James was one of the first books in the NT to be written and all scripture is "for" us to learn from but not all scripture is written "to" us. There is a vast difference between the "for" to learn and the "to" us. James thought as a Jew and he related what he knew as a Jew. By the time Paul went to Jerusalem in Acts 21:20 - most of the gospel of the grace of Christ had been watered down by Jewish believers that were "zealous for the law".
I think that what James was talking about as far as faith having a corresponding work is in line with Paul and that we are saved by grace through faith. Each one of James' examples showed a "one time" corresponding action to their faith. Real faith will always have a corresponding action to it. James is looking at it from a different point of view because he was trying to show his readers that they were to help their brethren out by "doing something" to help feed them and clothe them and not just use words.
Let the Scripture be as honest to you as possible. Who's the audience...the nation of Israel as a whole. Why is the Lord addressing the nation of Israel as a whole? When does he want them to know what's going on and how to respond? Since James is written before Paul's epistles, why is it placed after? Could it be that the Lord has something to say to His people Israel during the tribulation as the coming of the Lord is at hand(literally) and the judge is standing before the door? Should we not take this literally? Paul says the Lord is seated at the right hand of the Father. Why? Is He sitting until the fullness of the Gentile be come in? Think about these things. Before I had a dispensational view of Scripture I too would view James as a Christian epistle. I believe it's so much deeper than that.
I think James had no idea that we in 2016 would be reading his letter that he wrote to his Jewish people. I just take the letter for what it is - writing to the people of his day and in it are things I can learn from the Holy Spirit.
James wrote to the 12 tribes because to him - that's what the only believers in Jesus were back when he wrote the epistle.
So, you are saying that the tribulation was around 61AD - 70AD? When is the tribulation to you? Is it already past?
I think James wrote to the people of his day which to him were all Jewish at the time of his writings to them. They were not too fond of them Gentile dogs which were unclean.
I don't see any conflict at all with Paul and James - just 2 sides of the same coin being expressed differently.
I grew up hearing the phrase that once you are saved, you are always saved. You cannot loose your salvation is that statement true, please help me find scriptures that discuss this topic further.