I was thinking about this the other day. I mean, not that I was tired of hearing about Whangdoodles - I mean, who can be, that cares about the future of humanity? - but that there's a lot of misinformation out there being spread about them. For example, just because someone is difficult or unpleasant doesn't make that someone a Whangdoodle in diguise. I mean, he (or she - I guess Whangdoodles can disguise themselves as shes also, although more difficult for obvious reasons) could be, especially if it's a very good disguise, and some Whangdoodles have very good disguises, but these can usually be linked to a recent robbery at a local disguise shop, because Whangdoodles are so lazy that they must just steal, and often can't make anything themselves - especially disguises.I'm still gleaning information, mostly through following @CarriePie and @Charlesiii's posts in another thread.
This is something I really love about the forum!
There's plenty of room, so those who want to keep talking about something can, and those who don't want to hear about it anymore have thousands of other threads to choose from, and/or, can always start their own!
But kids these days - you will hear them say "oh, he's a Whangdoodle", or even "she's a Whangdoodle", when all the other one did is gave the first one a funny look, or perhaps borrowed some lunch money without asking in order to buy an extra comic at the local deli next to the school.
If we created some educational material about the nefarious nature of Whangdoodles, and who is truly a Whangdoodle, and who is not actually very likely to be a Whangdoodle, and some scientific tests to conduct to verify the accuracy of claims of Whangdoodliness, we could insist this book (or series of books) be added to the school curriculum, and then every Dominique and Harry could have a much more informed opinion before making accusations of "Whangdoodle" willy-nilly. If we did the series well enough, it might even become a subject in its own right.
