Yes so that doesn't mean they are satanic like a certain individual on this forum said.
I remember there was a certain German guy who said the Jews are satanic. We all saw how that worked out
Parents: your children have been targeted for DESTRUCTION
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I remember there was a certain German guy who said the Jews are satanic. We all saw how that worked out
K
kaylagrl
Guest
No but seriously, count how many black people you see in commercials and think back to even two years ago. There has been a sudden rush to placate black people because they know they are looking for something else. They know platitudes isn't getting it done anymore. They know they are breaking right even when they are told their very lives are in danger if they do. Still some people can think for themselves, imagine that.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
No, not at all. Romans says ...
I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew.
If God doesn't reject them, why should we?
28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
See a lot of cuckoo conspiracy theories how about Jewish people allegedly running the entire planet and that they are behind secret Satan worshiping cults and stuff.
It's all just tin foil hat nonsense
There's a reason why the Jewish people cuminatively managed to obtain so much wealth
The Christian New testament says don't charge interest on loans.
The Jewish Torah has no such qualms
K
kaylagrl
Guest
The Jews are both blessed and cursed. They were disobedient, but God still calls to them and longs for them to come home. They are a chosen nation and from the beginning they have been persecuted. From Haman to Hitler the Jews have been hated, lied on, exiled and murdered, all because they are a chosen race. Yes, they run Hollywood, yes, many banks, yes they are successful at what they turn their hand to because they are blessed by God. Many of them don't know it, yet, but there will come a day. And as I say, either that is true, or God's a liar.
https://christianchat.com/threads/this-side-of-the-glass.182929/post-4966876
"And the worst is not here ...perhaps a prelude to the worst to come. And the 'adversary' roams the 'air' without fear, for fear
of the unknown has society in a 'headlock'.
“The things that count cease being those that can be held in the hand and become only what can be held in the heart.”
"And the worst is not here ...perhaps a prelude to the worst to come. And the 'adversary' roams the 'air' without fear, for fear
of the unknown has society in a 'headlock'.
“The things that count cease being those that can be held in the hand and become only what can be held in the heart.”
leaving out parts of what people actually said is called quote mining and it is grossly dishonest.
leaving off that single word radically changes the statement. it says that they are against the REQUIREMENT of a nuclear family, the idea that only a nuclear family as value. You claim that they are saying they are against is just a lie and the fact you had to alter what was actually said shows that you know this and lied purposefully.
Facts remain even if you don't like them[/QUOTE]
K
kaylagrl
Guest
Bud, the statement is there for anyone to read. They are not for the nuclear family, they are Marxist. There is no dishonesty, look up what Marxists believe.
The facts are they said themselves they are Marxists.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
Not if they know anything about Marxism. " Marxists argue that the nuclear family performs ideological functions for Capitalism – the family acts as a unit of consumption and teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy. It is also the institution through which the wealthy pass down their private property to their children, thus reproducing class inequality."
Ding, ding , ding!! Thanks for playing now. They call themselves "trained Marxists" so it's pretty easy to follow what they believe if you know Marxism. Which is where CRT is coming from and why parents have objections to it.
Marxism is a ‘structural conflict’ perspective. They see society as structured along class lines with institutions generally working in the interests of the small elite class who have economic power (the ‘Bourgeoisie’) and the much larger working class (the ‘Proletariat’). The Bourgeoise gain their wealth from exploiting the proletariat. There is thus a conflict of interests between the Bourgeoise and the Proletariat.
However, this conflict of interests rarely boils over into revolution because institutions such as the family perform the function of ‘ideological control’, or convincing the masses that the present unequal system is inevitable, natural and good.
Marxists suggest the nuclear family emerges not because of the needs of industrialisation, but because of the needs of the capitalist system.
According to Engels, (founder of Marxism with Karl) the monogamous nuclear family only emerged with Capitalism. Before Capitalism, traditional, tribal societies were classless and they practised a form of ‘primitive communism’ in which there was no private property. In such societies, property was collectively owned, and the family structure reflected this – there were no families as such, but tribal groups existed in a kind of ‘promiscuous horde’ in which there were no restrictions on sexual relationships.
However, with the emergence of Capitalism in the 18th Century, society and the family changed. Capitalism is based on a system of private ownership – The bourgeois use their own personal wealth to personally invest in businesses in order to make a profit, they don’t invest for the benefit of everyone else.
The Bourgeois started to look for ways to pass on their wealth to the next generation, rather than having it shared out amongst the masses, and this is where the monogamous nuclear family comes from. It is the best way of guaranteeing that you are passing on your property to your son, because in a monogamous relationship you have a clear idea of who your own children are.
Ultimately what this arrangement does is to reproduce inequality – The children of the rich grow up into wealth, while the children of the poor remain poor. Thus the nuclear family benefits the Bourgeois more than the proletariat.
Ahhh there is that word they love to use so much!!! INEQUALITY !!
The modern nuclear family functions to promote values that ensure the reproduction and maintenance of capitalism. The family is described as an ideological apparatus – this means it socialises people to think in a way that justifies inequality and encourages people to accept the capitalist system as fair, natural and unchangeable.
Stick with me children. From the BLM website...
"“We build a space that affirms Black women free from sexism…and free from environments in which men are centered,” ( Like the family?) BLM continues. “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families ( Ahhh read back, Marxism! No nuclear family!) …that collectively care ( No nuclear family) for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable. We foster a queer-affirming network…with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking…” ( two of BLM founders are lesbians and grew up without a father in the home)
Now children is BLM or CRT for or against the nuclear family?? Have I lied been dishonest or misrepresented their views?? Read the lesson for yourself and see who is right and who is wrong on the subject. I think I've made my point, lesson over for today.
I absolutely agree that black lives matter and that racism is still a problem that needs to be addressed like when Sandra Bland was pulled out of her car Jim Croce over a cigarette. However BLM is largely a fraud. They have hijacked a legitimate civil Rights movement for their own special gain. That's why I wanted there executives bought a multi-million dollar house in California a few years ago using donations
Things all credibility when you show up at political events and try to take the mic and not let anyone else speak.
Cultural Marxism in a nutshell is using woke propaganda to try to manipulate culture to your own agenda
Things all credibility when you show up at political events and try to take the mic and not let anyone else speak.
Cultural Marxism in a nutshell is using woke propaganda to try to manipulate culture to your own agenda
K
kaylagrl
Guest
They Marxist,those are Marxist beliefs. In a court I law I would have won, you lost.
and to quote your link "we found no evidence that Cullors had used donated money to buy the homes cited by Dirt and the New York Post, and noted that Cullors, a public figure with multiple ventures, had her own sources of wealth." So you just confirmed the fact check I posted earlier. Thank you.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
(In 2021, we found no evidence that Cullors had used donated money to buy the homes cited by Dirt and the New York Post, and noted that Cullors, a public figure with multiple ventures, had her own sources of wealth.) For example, Cullors co-authored the New York Times bestseller book "When They Call You a Terrorist," and had struck a deal with Warner Brothers to help the network develop programming.
In February 2021, BLMGN disclosed it had raised $90 million in donations in 2020. The 2021 revelations about home purchases created tensions over finances within the decentralized movement, namely bitter accusations that while BLMGN was flush with cash, activists on the ground and various chapters languished. Meanwhile, families of victims of police violence slammed the group for using their loved ones' names to raise cash while failing to assist them.
When the stories broke, we were unable to independently verify the home purchases. But in the 2022 Intelligencer report, Black Lives Matter movement leaders indirectly acknowledged that Cullors had purchased homes, though the story doesn't give specifics:
“I think they’ve attempted to cancel us, but they have not been successful in canceling us,” [BLM leader Melina] Abdullah said at another point in the conversation. “They’ve attempted to say — and I’m just gonna say it — ‘She bought some damn houses. We gonna cancel her.’” Garza cut in with a comment seemingly addressed to critics: “Y’all don’t know (explicative) about what it takes to live in a box here.”
We asked BLMGN for an updated amount the organization has collected from donations to date, but didn't get a response in time for publication.
and still zero evidence that Cullors in any way used donated money. You keep proving my point.
K
kaylagrl
Guest
Oh there's plenty of money missing. But you won't hear about where it went. Just as they said, no update on the story of what money bought the houses. If anyone other than BLM pulled that the IRS would be all over it. Unless someone digs into it, that money is up in smoke.
But let's skip that story. You made no comment on BLM and Marxism. Seems they are hand in hand if you check back to post 70. I didn't give money to BLM so I could care less what they did with it. But I do maintain that BLM< CRT> Marxism go hand in hand. And that is why parents are pushing back against it.
Remember when covid was at its peak and everything was shut down?
Everyone was advised not to have public gatherings
BLM was still having public gatherings because "racism is a bigger public health threat than covid"
So again before anyone's straw man's me I am most definitely not arguing that black lives don't matter but the problem is that BLM is largely a fraud but you're not allowed to say that or your "racist '
Everyone was advised not to have public gatherings
BLM was still having public gatherings because "racism is a bigger public health threat than covid"
So again before anyone's straw man's me I am most definitely not arguing that black lives don't matter but the problem is that BLM is largely a fraud but you're not allowed to say that or your "racist '