R
Wrong. The Lord does care about the flesh, otherwise why would he come to earth as God/man? Also, we're not just floating spirits in the New Heaven and New Earth, we'll have new, sinless bodies. Anything else isn't biblical but more akin to Eastern Mysticism.
Question: "Was the Apostle Paul actually a false prophet?"
Answer: The theory that the apostle Paul was a false prophet and not a true follower of Christ is usually put forth by those of the Hebrew roots movement persuasion, among others. They believe Christians should submit to the Old Testament Law, but Paul clearly disagrees with them, proclaiming that Christians are no longer under the Mosaic Law (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15), but the Law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), which is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind…and to love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:37-39). Rather than submitting to God’s Word, the Hebrew roots movement simply dismisses Paul altogether and claims that Paul was a false apostle and that his writings should not be in the Bible.
Read more: Was the Apostle Paul actually a false prophet?
From the above:
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Galatians 5:1
A big problem for Paul haters is that Peter says the same thing.
So now why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke [of circumcision that binds them to the law of Moses] that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus in the same way those also are.” Acts 15:10-11
p_rehbein.... Can I send that cute snow angel pic to someone? Please... It's adorable
Sorry I don't have a comment about this thread... I don't feel I need say anything in defense of Paul, he doesn't need me to back his commission that came directly from Christ
Love you guys and gals,
lexi
This is a truth plainly set forth in Scripture by a few verses. What were the requirements for an apostle of Jesus' earthly ministry (Rm 15:8), according to Scripture, Christ and the Holy Spirit?
So, we should see & understand, God in keeping with His character (Holy, just, righteous & perfect in all His ways), did what when He raised up, converted and separated Saul unto Himself? (Rm 1:1, Gal 1:15)
I want to include a verse, part of the apostle Paul's commission statement, if you will, for consideration in the fact, if something is different- it is not the same.
"For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect." 1 Corinthians 1:17
Let the words on the page say what they mean. This shows distiction, right division, for a purpose God is revealing about a change in His dealings with man in time. Read in a King James Version of the bible, pls, so we are sharing in the same words, Eph 2:11-13.
Let me offer one more verse of distinction, for our conversation, study, profit & learning;
"But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;" Gal 2:7
The Lord does not care about the flesh. No flesh will enter the kingdom. Look what he did to Jesus's flesh.
Zone, what dose your post, about "Hebrew root's moment" and your other posts which seem out of place, have to do with the OP 's comment ???
Smiling! I am not as savvy as some here when it comes to the format & getting around in this website, pls have patience when directing responses to me, thx.
@ Old Hermit, um, no, no problem with either.
In addition to my original post, according to Scripture, we'll just look at Acts 1, after recently being instructed some 40 days by the risen Lord, speaking of things pertaining to the kingdom of God, Peter stood up to address the replacement of Judas, there are a couple verses, 21 & 22, we can read of some of the requirements to take part in the ministry of the little flock, to the bride of Christ.
There is a reason for the terms, bride of Christ and the one new man. God is not the God of confusion, we all agree I'm sure. Scripture is not meant to be harmonized, but rightly divided, so that we may know some things about who we are in Christ and what God is doing in accordance with our position, calling, vocation, inheritance.
We never read about the new man in the four gospels of Christ's earthly ministry and we certainly never read about a kingdom of priests in Paul's epistles, there is a distinction for a reason, "the mystery of his will" (Eph 1:9). It's about realms & dominions, principalities & powers, a plan of glory. " wisdom which none of the princes of this world knew; for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory."
Smiling! I am not as savvy as some here when it comes to the format & getting around in this website, pls have patience when directing responses to me, thx.
@ Old Hermit, um, no, no problem with either.
In addition to my original post, according to Scripture, we'll just look at Acts 1, after recently being instructed some 40 days by the risen Lord, speaking of things pertaining to the kingdom of God, Peter stood up to address the replacement of Judas, there are a couple verses, 21 & 22, we can read of some of the requirements to take part in the ministry of the little flock, to the bride of Christ.
There is a reason for the terms, bride of Christ and the one new man. God is not the God of confusion, we all agree I'm sure. Scripture is not meant to be harmonized, but rightly divided, so that we may know some things about who we are in Christ and what God is doing in accordance with our position, calling, vocation, inheritance.
We never read about the new man in the four gospels of Christ's earthly ministry and we certainly never read about a kingdom of priests in Paul's epistles, there is a distinction for a reason, "the mystery of his will" (Eph 1:9). It's about realms & dominions, principalities & powers, a plan of glory. " wisdom which none of the princes of this world knew; for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory."
I believe things are getting mixed up. There was a physical circumcision and a spiritual one. You must know which one they are speaking of in the scriptures. The Lord does not care about the flesh. No flesh will enter the kingdom. Look what he did to Jesus's flesh. The circumcision of the heart is what matters.