S
The programmers (the ones who made the forum architecture, not the RoboOp who bought and is using the program) will probably never include that option again, as it would get them in trouble with the alphabet mafia.
It has turned all of our women into men!It is a shame that the blue-and-pink scheme ever went away in the first place.
The programmers (the ones who made the forum architecture, not the RoboOp who bought and is using the program) will probably never include that option again, as it would get them in trouble with the alphabet mafia.
Why do you think it was written without the blue-and-pink scheme?Hmm…I hadn’t thought of that.
Chicken, egg. It was probably because there was no demand for it. Implementing it would have taken resources (mostly time) that could be spent making features the majority of customers WILL want.Why do you think it was written without the blue-and-pink scheme?
Do you think there just might be a powerful force/influence at work to drive everything toward being gender-neutral?
Somehow, I seriously doubt it was because the programmer did not know how to use two colors.![]()
![]()
It's more fun to believe everything is a conspiracy. Then you can legitimize your complaining about everything.We began using this software in 2018. Before everything went crazy with gender stuff. Sure, it existed, but not to the degree it does now. And who knows how long before 2018 the software had been in existence. Not everything is a conspiracy.
"sodomite baby"![]()
I think that was a joke.
No doubt, at the very least - he said it to illustrate a point - if I remember correctly - concerning the abuse of the rainbow as an iconic symbol. But, it is like - yeah, just ponder that impossibility for a moment...You have to remember that it's the sodomites that always claim that the were "born that way".
The Baptist preachers are the ones in society most vocal against that lie, so I think he was using sarcasm with that statement, don't you?
![]()
Satan always takes what God has done, then twists it and misappropriates it.No doubt, at the very least - he said it to illustrate a point - if I remember correctly - concerning the abuse of the rainbow as an iconic symbol. But, it is like - yeah, just ponder that impossibility for a moment...