How can you tell who is chosen? There is an answer from the Bible. Do you know it?Its the basis by which it saved them chosen by the Father
Sounds like the OP is possibly a Calvinist. I am not sure though and I am not assuming. Your point though is accurate. Salvation for which Christ paid in full for those who believe is a gift and a gift has to be received. We have to come to Jesus, believe He is the Son of God. Repentance comes with that faith but it is Jesus who paid for our salvation in full...I agree it's through His death we were reconciled, but if you skip back to chapter 5 it's clear that the way we enter into this grace is through faith.
"Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God." Romans 5:1-2
It's like if I said I have a crisp $1,000,000 dollar bill I want to give to you. It's yours, I've already made plans to give it to you; but you must meet me at such and such a place and at such and such a time to receive it. If you don't have faith and proceed to the meeting you'll never receive it.
What a laughable analysis. One word and you want to build a whole story round it.Wrong. Through salvation is ALL debt eliminated and was paid in full by Jesus Christ, the Savior.
Regarding your statement and example above, the master did not eliminate all of the unforgiving servant's debts; he eliminated only all of that particular debt - the servant had other debts with the master in addition to that one. We know this because of the word "that" of "that debt" - by it, a differentiation was made between it and his other debts, otherwise, it would simply have been phrased as "the servant's debt", period; also, because it was forgiven, and had that been his only debt, the master would not have been able -with it being forgiven - to un-forgive it, and to hold him accountable to deliver him to the tormentors for that which was forgiven. So, the only way he could have done so, is if there were other remaining debts that he still owed to the master.
[Mat 18:32, 34 KJV]
32 Then his lord, after that he had called him, said unto him, O thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou desiredst me: ...
34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
I have a good hope one may be chosen by their adherence to the Gospel Truth, which does include the Truths of Tulip. But this thread isnt about that, its about reconciliation by the death of Christ and what that entails.How can you tell who is chosen? There is an answer from the Bible. Do you know it?
Do you still believe, contrary to the definition, that reconciliation is one-sided?I have a good hope one may be chosen by their adherence to the Gospel Truth, which does include the Truths of Tulip. But this thread isnt about that, its about reconciliation by the death of Christ and what that entails.
Forgiveness from you is not necessary - but thanks anyway. It is not just "one word" it is the whole parable, which you apparently do not understand because you didn't read it closely enough. The parable does not say the ten thousand talents were all that were owed the lord, just that those ten thousand talents were a debt that he owed him. You assume the ten thousand talents were all, but do you see in vs 18:24 (below), the "and when he had BEGUN to reckon"? His lord's reckoning had not yet completed - there was more to reckon remaining.The King wouldn't sell him off and all his family to pay a part of the debt. He would sell his family and keep him working to pay off the remainder if what was forgiven was only partial.
You are reading into the story things that are simply not there.Forgiveness from you is not necessary - but thanks anyway. It is not just "one word" it is the whole parable, which you apparently do not understand because you didn't read it closely enough. The parable does not say the ten thousand talents were all that were owed the lord, just that those ten thousand talents were a debt that he owed him. You assume the ten thousand talents were all, but do you see in vs 18:24 (below), the "and when he had BEGUN to reckon"? His lord's reckoning had not yet completed - there was more to reckon remaining.
The unmerciful servant was sent to the tormenters because he would not forgive others, yet he himself sill had debt. That servant could not be sent to the tormentors for a debt that had already been forgiven him- not continued, not held in abeyance, not made contingent- but forgiven. And by having been forgiven, it was no longer in his Lord's power or prerogative to reinstate it, otherwise, were that the case, it would mean that being forgiven was meaningless, as it could therefore, never, ever be done away with - but to be truly forgiven means that it was not reversable - so you can't have it both ways - it was either forgiven or it wasn't- but through forgiveness, it was eliminated and no longer due to his lord. Therefore, it could only have been for other outstanding debts that he also had pending, and for those, he was sent to the tormentors.
This can be seen in vs18:34. It doesn't say ten thousand talents, but ALL that that was due unto him, which, by having forgiven the servant, those ten thousand talents were not part of it.
[Mat 18:24 KJV] 24 And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.
[Mat 18:34 KJV] 34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
No, all of his debts were forgiven. Don't you see? The Lord turned him over to tormentors, who didn't extract talents from him. This was a different sort of payment. He was not being punished for owing the Lord money; He was being punished for being the kind of person who wouldn't forgive others.Forgiveness from you is not necessary - but thanks anyway. It is not just "one word" it is the whole parable, which you apparently do not understand because you didn't read it closely enough. The parable does not say the ten thousand talents were all that were owed the lord, just that those ten thousand talents were a debt that he owed him. You assume the ten thousand talents were all, but do you see in vs 18:24 (below), the "and when he had BEGUN to reckon"? His lord's reckoning had not yet completed - there was more to reckon remaining.
The unmerciful servant was sent to the tormenters because he would not forgive others, yet he himself sill had debt. That servant could not be sent to the tormentors for a debt that had already been forgiven him- not continued, not held in abeyance, not made contingent- but forgiven. And by having been forgiven, it was no longer in his Lord's power or prerogative to reinstate it, otherwise, were that the case, it would mean that being forgiven was meaningless, as it could therefore, never, ever be done away with - but to be truly forgiven means that it was not reversable - so you can't have it both ways - it was either forgiven or it wasn't- but through forgiveness, it was eliminated and no longer due to his lord. Therefore, it could only have been for other outstanding debts that he also had pending, and for those, he was sent to the tormentors.
This can be seen in vs18:34. It doesn't say ten thousand talents, but ALL that that was due unto him, which, by having forgiven the servant, those ten thousand talents were not part of it.
[Mat 18:24 KJV] 24 And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.
[Mat 18:34 KJV] 34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
Think about it this way. When the preacher says, "Jesus saves," his word falls on deaf ears. Why? Because, framed that way, the message is impersonal and too generalized. If I want a savior, I want to know if Jesus will save ME. Yes, Jesus saves people but I want to know if I am one of those people.I have a good hope one may be chosen by their adherence to the Gospel Truth, which does include the Truths of Tulip. But this thread isnt about that, its about reconciliation by the death of Christ and what that entails.
Post 110 do you understand it ?Think about it this way. When the preacher says, "Jesus saves," his word falls on deaf ears. Why? Because, framed that way, the message is impersonal and too generalized. If I want a savior, I want to know if Jesus will save ME. Yes, Jesus saves people but I want to know if I am one of those people.
The existential crisis at the heart of the gospel.
Every honest hearer asks the same question: "Am I included?” This is not selfishness. This is the very nature of salvation.
If salvation is rescue, then the question is not, “Does the rescuer rescue people?”
The question is, “Will the rescuer rescue me?”
If salvation is forgiveness, the question is not, “Does Jesus forgive sinners?”
The question is, “Will He forgive my sins?”
If salvation is eternal life, the question is not, “Does Jesus give eternal life?”
The question is, “Will He give me eternal life?”
Salvation is not a general announcement but a personal encounter. When a preacher says, “Jesus saves,” the statement is true but existentially empty, because it does not answer the only question the human heart cares about: “Will He save *me*?” Scripture never treats salvation as a category but as a relationship—being known, called, forgiven, and interceded for by name. A generalized proclamation cannot save because it does not address the individual. The gospel becomes real only when the universal truth becomes a personal promise.
That individual had not been reconciled to God by Jesus Christ. Thats a different economy God dealt with that person upon, more like the LawNo, all of his debts were forgiven. Don't you see? The Lord turned him over to tormentors, who didn't extract talents from him. This was a different sort of payment. He was not being punished for owing the Lord money; He was being punished for being the kind of person who wouldn't forgive others.
Jesus is arguing from the greater to the lesser. If God is willing to forgive my debt to him, which is very large, then I should be willing to forgive my brother's debt to me, which is much smaller by comparison. And that is the key to the parable: our willingness to forgive.
No, all of his debts were forgiven. Don't you see? The Lord turned him over to tormentors, who didn't extract talents from him. This was a different sort of payment. He was not being punished for owing the Lord money; He was being punished for being the kind of person who wouldn't forgive others.
Jesus is arguing from the greater to the lesser. If God is willing to forgive my debt to him, which is very large, then I should be willing to forgive my brother's debt to me, which is much smaller by comparison. And that is the key to the parable: our willingness to forgive.
He is being punished for not being willing to forgive his brothers.What do you think this verse is saying?
[Mat 18:34 KJV] 34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.
No. This is an illustration of Jesus' teaching that if we are unwilling to forgive others, God is not willing to forgive us.That individual had not been reconciled to God by Jesus Christ. Thats a different economy God dealt with that person upon, more like the Law
I understand Paul's point about what Christ did. But you don't understand that actual reconciliation isn't accomplished until a person repents.Post 110 do you understand it ?
2 Cor 5:19 Preaching Reconciliation !
2 Cor 5:19
19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
When Preaching the Word of reconciliation as the Apostle Paul did, it is imperative to Preach the Non Imputation of sin or trespasses unto those Christ died for and reconciled to God by His Death Rom 5:10, for in our text we read in 2 Cor 5:19 how was God reconciling the World [The Church] unto Himself, for it is put quite plainly " by not imputing their...
False, thats conditional forgiveness based on mans actions, thats against Forgiveness and reconciliation by Christ Christs blood and death.No. This is an illustration of Jesus' teaching that if we are unwilling to forgive others, God is not willing to forgive us.
Absolutely false and a attack on Christs Death accomplishment Rom 5:10I understand Paul's point about what Christ did. But you don't understand that actual reconciliation isn't accomplished until a person repents.