Replacement theology? Yes or No.

[God-fearing]

In other words in both your eschatology and mine the everlasting land and circumcision covenants with Abraham have spiritual fulfillment not earthly.
You have added your 1000 year millennial kingdom, but 1000 years is not eternity so you have no grounds for objection to a heavenly fulfillment to these everlasting promises.

If I may just as a suggestion.....in the old testament it is believed by scholars that because of the evidence that jews had no number beyond 1000, they considered 1000 as forever. Notice that when the scriptures declare 1000 yrs or tens of thousands or even thousands of thousands. Always in terms of thousands which is believed to be their highest number.
Food for thought.

 

[Revelation1v8]

In other words in both your eschatology and mine the everlasting land and circumcision covenants with Abraham have spiritual fulfillment not earthly.
You have added your 1000 year millennial kingdom, but 1000 years is not eternity so you have no grounds for objection to a heavenly fulfillment to these everlasting promises.

There's an earthly fulfillment of 1,000 years before the Kingdom of Heaven comes down that's eternal. Covenants aren't needed in the Kingdom of Heaven.

--

 

[OMC]

This is more a personal question for you.
Do you accept that the land restoration events of Deuteronomy 30 apply to the Christ and the Gospel as Paul teaches, or would you prefer to attach your name to a fruitless mass murder campaign in the Middle East without command or warrant from God?

My concern is that once we frame the debate in those terms, we stop discussing what Moses, the prophets, Paul, and the New Testament actually say and start forcing people into positions they may not hold.
I gladly attach my name to Christ and the gospel.
Beyond that, every prophetic conclusion still has to be demonstrated from Scripture.

 

[Beekeeper]

I gladly attach my name to Christ and the gospel.

Then this is a good discovery for you brother, because Paul attaches the Deuteronomy 30 restoration to Christ and the Gospel.

My concern is that once we frame the debate in those terms, we stop discussing what Moses, the prophets, Paul, and the New Testament actually say and start forcing people into positions they may not hold.

Scripture is discerned through the spirit of God, and God is good.
A tree is known by its fruit.
I would be looking for the character of God in the interpretations I accept too.

 

[Revelation1v8]

Then this is a good discovery for you brother, because Paul attaches the Deuteronomy 30 restoration to Christ and the Gospel.

Scripture is discerned through the spirit of God, and God is good.
A tree is known by its fruit.
I would be looking for the character of God in the interpretations I accept too.

How exactly do you define "the character of God"? His character shows that He keeps His promises to ALL.

AND

God/Jesus has endless mercy that you should try to emulate.

---

 

[OMC]

Then this is a good discovery for you brother, because Paul attaches the Deuteronomy 30 restoration to Christ and the Gospel.

Scripture is discerned through the spirit of God, and God is good.
A tree is known by its fruit.
I would be looking for the character of God in the interpretations I accept too.

On that much, I think we agree: Christ is the center, the gospel is the fulfillment, and any interpretation that loses sight of God's character revealed in Christ should be carefully reexamined.

 

[Revelation1v8]

On that much, I think we agree: Christ is the center, the gospel is the fulfillment, and any interpretation that loses sight of God's character revealed in Christ should be carefully reexamined.

Does that mean you believe Jesus when He says:

Luke 24:44 - And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.

--

 

[Revelation1v8]

@Beekeeper & @OMC

I think you both need to take a second look at:

Romans 11:30-32

30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:

31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.

32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.


Romans 11:30–32 teaches that Gentile believers received mercy due to Jewish disobedience, establishing a reciprocal dynamic where Jews may now receive mercy through the mercy shown to Gentiles. This passage is interpreted by many theologians as a call for Gentile Christians to treat Israel with compassion and respect, rather than arrogance, recognizing that both groups are equally dependent on divine grace.

The text emphasizes that God’s mercy is not exclusive to one group; since God has "consigned all to disobedience" so He might have mercy on all, believers are urged to avoid contempt for the Jewish people. Historical commentaries suggest that the mercy of the Gentiles—manifested as pity and the sharing of the gospel—may serve as the instrumental means for Israel’s future restoration and salvation.

Ultimately, the passage argues that salvation is by mercy alone, not merit, requiring Gentile Christians to maintain a posture of humility and brotherly love toward Israel, knowing that the same God who loves the patriarchs remains faithful to His promises.

---