Replacement theology? Yes or No.
- Thread starter Gideon300
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Saying “that rationale is spurious” doesn’t answer the point because every NT book is written to first‑century believers yet teaches realities that obviously extend beyond them. That’s not futurism — that’s how Scripture functions.
They are to be read now, and those some who can, to analyze and teach details as to why what was written back then.
Maybe it is for 3000 years from now... because I am told "until" means everything is on hold.
FYI, not only does a legit reading of Acts 2 and 15 utterly debunk amillenialism, it is also an iron-clad confirmation of the restoration of the kingdom to Israel.
I am not an Amillenialist.
The national promise to Israel was the Messiah, no doubt on that.
“Ezekiel 37 is not “denied”; it’s misapplied when you treat the modern state of Israel as the literal fulfillment of the resurrection‑and‑new‑covenant vision God gave Ezekiel. Ezekiel 37 is not about a geopolitical return — it’s about the resurrection of God’s people, the giving of the Spirit, the creation of one people under one Shepherd, and the establishment of an everlasting covenant. The apostles apply that to Christ and the Church, not to a national restoration“
well said it’s about the children of Abraham as god sees them not as the world sees them
“For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
Galatians 3:26-29 KJV
Israel’s promise is the gospel Jesus and the apostles all preached it to them
“Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
For the promise is unto you, and to your children,
and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call. “
Acts 2:36, 38-39, KJV
there’s no hope for Israel or any gentile person without accepting the gospel Jesus preached and sent to all humanity and inheriting the promises of Christ the only begotten. There’s nothing else coming for Israel or a gentile no other hope or light to be found… just cjriet and the messengers he sent out in conmission
ROLF. Your trivial sniping and one liners are proof of....... absolutely nothing.
Other than the preterist penchant for wish casting and woeful biblical illiteracy.
Told them 1000 times, they refuse to listen.
They want a secular state instead of Jesus.
Golden calf, 4000 years later , still.
You have never, not once, provided a Biblically grounded, accurate, cogent comprehensive buttoned down and complete REBUTTAL to my many posts using actual Scriptural references.
Your inane conspiracy theories and baseless propaganda amount to no more than an embarrassing testimonial to failed preterist dogma.
Im sorry but I really can't understand what this problem labeled futuristic is all about.
Our Lords first advent was to offer up himself to save others...period. Without this happening there is no future prophecies that can be fulfilled. Why because we are talking about a global event not a isolated happening.
The book of revelation is global. Not just in the middle east or Rome or toledo Ohio its all global.
Right before your eyes you see God bring these things together, Isael ,Russia, China, U.S. , great Britain, Europe, Iran.ect
And each one of these have saved people's in them. God is addressing the world in the end times events.
Jesus said he had come to fulfill ....if there were no hope of escape, no salvation given, no forgiveness offered, no sacrifice made there would be no fulfillment of prophecy. Period.
As I said previously the book of revelation is a global event not a isolated event. More than half the world was not even explored or preached in yet at the times many are mentioning.
Our Lords first advent was to offer up himself to save others...period. Without this happening there is no future prophecies that can be fulfilled. Why because we are talking about a global event not a isolated happening.
The book of revelation is global. Not just in the middle east or Rome or toledo Ohio its all global.
Right before your eyes you see God bring these things together, Isael ,Russia, China, U.S. , great Britain, Europe, Iran.ect
And each one of these have saved people's in them. God is addressing the world in the end times events.
Jesus said he had come to fulfill ....if there were no hope of escape, no salvation given, no forgiveness offered, no sacrifice made there would be no fulfillment of prophecy. Period.
As I said previously the book of revelation is a global event not a isolated event. More than half the world was not even explored or preached in yet at the times many are mentioning.
Au contraire, my posts on the matter of the accurate and COMPLETE interpretation of Ezekiel 37 are absolutely bomb-proof boilerplate.
No one has successfully rebutted them, and no one will.
You’re drawing a line Scripture itself refuses to draw: the New Testament absolutely contains abstract realities, but those realities are anchored in historical sequences that extend beyond the first century, and your appeal to time‑stamps, audience relevance, apocalyptic language, and OT typology doesn’t overturn that — it simply describes how fulfillment begins. Paul’s “until the fullness of the Gentiles” in Romans 11 is a time‑stamp that stretches past his audience; Peter’s “the last days” in Acts 2 inaugurates an era, not exhausts it; Jesus’ “this gospel will be preached to all nations” in Matthew 24 is not a first‑century boundary but a mission trajectory; the resurrection order in 1 Cor 15 is explicitly future; the return of Christ in 1 Thess 4 is not apocalyptic metaphor but historical promise.
Your claim that “there is no evidence to suggest otherwise” only stands if you treat apocalyptic language as exhaustive rather than inaugurating, and if you collapse typology into a single‑generation fulfillment rather than the multi‑stage pattern the NT itself uses. The first century is the hinge, not the whole door
Ezekiel 37 is saying God will restore whoever He will restore. Did you read anywhere God telling the believers to help dry bones to steal land, murder, do pagan worship?
It never tells anyone to murder others to help God to restore.
As I told you many times, Jesus didn't teach the crowd to put him on cross, the most horrific crime in human history, that created man would put their creator on the cross.
Indeed, the restoration of the Kingdom to Israel is certain and inevitable, as is their redemption and mandate to service.
But what you likewise fail to appreciate is that this wonderful work of grace and forgiveness is also "good" aka "beautiful".
John 10:32
Jesus responded to them, I have shown unto you many beautiful works from the Father; on account of which of these do you stone me?
There you go @2ndTimeIsTheCharm : try and conjure up a rebuttal. We are waiting.....
“Ezekiel 37 is saying God will restore whoever He will restore” is not an interpretation of Ezekiel 37. It is a substitution of a vague theological statement for what the text explicitly says.
Of course God is sovereign and may save or restore whomever He chooses. But Ezekiel 37 is not asking the abstract question, “Whom is God capable of restoring?” It identifies a particular people, a particular national dispersion, a particular land, a particular covenant history, and a particular future restoration.
1. God explicitly identifies the dry bones
There is no ambiguity whatsoever:Not “whoever believes.”
Not “all humanity.”
Not “the Church.”
Not “whoever God decides to restore.”
The whole house of Israel.
God then quotes their national lament:
The vision is therefore interpreted for us by God Himself. The interpreter does not have permission to erase the inspired identification and replace it with an unspecified population.
2. God says He will bring THEM into THEIR land
Immediately afterward:And again:
Whose land?
The text answers that later in the same prophecy:
This is devastating to the “whoever” interpretation.
God does not say:
“I will put whoever I restore somewhere.”
He says that Israel will be restored to the land given to Jacob, the land in which their fathers lived.
Every noun restricts the referent.
3. The two-stick prophecy makes the identity even more explicit
Beginning in verse 16, God names the parties:and:
Then God explains the symbolism:
Again, this is not generic restoration.
It is:
the children of Israel
→ dispersed among the nations
→ gathered from those nations
→ brought into their own land.
One has to repeatedly delete phrases from the passage to make it mean “whoever God restores.”
4. They become ONE NATION
God continues:Notice the categories:
- one nation
- in the land
- upon the mountains of Israel
- reunited from Judah and Ephraim
- under one king.
The prophecy presupposes the actual history of Judah and Israel and promises their future reunification.
“Whoever God restores” explains none of that.
5. The restoration includes spiritual regeneration
Dispensational interpretation does not reduce Ezekiel 37 to a secular political return.God promises national restoration and spiritual regeneration:
Likewise:
This corresponds directly with Ezekiel 36:
followed by:
The sequence is unmistakable:
Israel scattered → Israel regathered → Israel cleansed → Israel spiritually renewed.
The restoration is neither merely political nor merely allegorical.
It is both national and spiritual.
6. The Davidic King identifies the prophetic framework
Ezekiel continues:And:
This connects the prophecy with the Davidic covenant and the Messianic kingdom.
Compare:
Jeremiah 23:5–6 — a righteous Branch of David reigns as King, while Judah is saved and Israel dwells safely.
Jeremiah 30:9 — Israel will “serve the LORD their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them.”
Hosea 3:5 — “the children of Israel shall return, and seek the LORD their God, and David their king.”
The prophets repeatedly combine:
Israel’s national restoration + Israel’s conversion + Davidic/Messianic rule.
That is exactly Ezekiel 37.
7. The covenant is made with the same people
God says:Who are “them”?
Grammar does not permit us to suddenly replace the antecedent.
“Them” refers to the same people described throughout the passage:
- Israel
- Judah
- Ephraim
- the children of Israel
- those scattered among the nations
- those returned to their land
- those dwelling in Jacob’s inheritance.
8. God places His sanctuary among THEM
The chapter closes:And then:
The final verse once again names the people:
ISRAEL.
And it distinguishes Israel from the nations observing what God has done.
That distinction becomes extremely difficult to explain if Israel has somehow ceased to mean Israel.
9. The surrounding chapters destroy the generic interpretation
Ezekiel 36–39 forms a connected restoration complex.Ezekiel 36:
Ezekiel 36:10:
Ezekiel 36:28:
Ezekiel 37:
Ezekiel 37:21:
Ezekiel 37:25:
Ezekiel 39:25:
Ezekiel 39:28:
This is sustained, repetitive identification.
The reader does not have to guess who is being discussed.
Here are some of your "unassailable (you forgot to say "infallible") facts":
Pre trib rapture, 7 year trib, spiritual rebirth of earthly Israel, rebuilt 3d temple with animal sacrifices, 1000 year reign of Christ come back to earth and world dominating Antichrist.
I have questioned every one of these assumptions and found them to be un-Biblical, but you interpret Biblical prophesy and other passages into them however they might seem to fit "easy as pie".
You then in turn use those same incorrectly interpreted passages as your "proofs".