That's the Christian pharisee rationalization for denying Christ.
Tragically true.
That's the Christian pharisee rationalization for denying Christ.
Yes, looks like they degraded Iranian offensive capabilities, and now the objective is to occupy Kharg and cut off Iranian oil exports at the source.
Fine quality gameplay and strategy IMO.
The first casualty in a war is the truth.Well that's what I'm trying to determine. I asked for evidence the carriers were headed to port, not for your abuse. Fox News is not a source for objective reality
I was referring to the pharisees in Jesus' time. They denied Jesus was the messiah, yet still believed they were God's chosen. When Jerusalem was destroyed, they out of necessity interpreted all prophecy to mean a future natural restoration of Israel. Those who believe what they believed are their spiritual progeny, just like those of faith are Abraham's progeny.
Went through it in the other thread, blinded for a time.
For them expect safe and secure pumping refining and transit. A result that we can all appreciate.And what do you think will happen to the oil industry in the Gulf states if that happens?
It's painful to watch such marvellous oil tech and infrastructure get destroyed. Though neccessary indeed as you put it in terms of cutting the IRGC off,, perhaps by taking the island we can actually preserve some of their oil industry ideally for a transitional government. This also helps begin pivoting to the final transitional phase, gives the people some incentive for the rightful son the Crown Prince return, he can say he can get the island back and help with rebuilding. Or if they wanna just be savage mahdi cultists you know, maybe we just keep literally their crown jewel of oil production for a while longer.Yes, looks like they degraded Iranian offensive capabilities, and now the objective is to occupy Kharg and cut off Iranian oil exports at the source.
Fine quality gameplay and strategy IMO.
For them expect safe and secure pumping refining and transit. A result that we can all appreciate.
There's nothing in scripture that says all will be unblinded. That's a pharisaical interpretation
Nonsense. On the contrary we declare and aver that the nation Israel will RECEIVE their Redeemer. Tears of joy will flow copiously, as the saga of Joseph makes abundantly clear.That's the Christian pharisee rationalization for denying Christ.
It's amazing how that quote itself is a popularly misattributed quote to Aeschylus but actually Aeschylus never said this and actually some dude from the 1900s AD did lol, but oh boy we'll start giving the preterists a heart attack if we go on like this. Still an epic quote though.The first casualty in a war is the truth.
Denying the fact that prophecy is future-telling is definitely bad hermaneutics.Along with the fact the letter is written to the believers in Rome at that time, it is called using correct hermeneutics.
Denying the fact that prophecy is future-telling is definitely bad hermaneutics.
You know.....like denying the obvious prophetic implications of Romans 11:25 for example.
Rom 11:25 - For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Nonsense. On the contrary we declare and aver that the nation Israel will RECEIVE their Redeemer. Tears of joy will flow copiously, as the saga of Joseph makes abundantly clear.
This inevitable outcome affirmed in glorious fashion by the many prophecies uttered by Jesus and His prophets.
You offer no proof because there isn't any. Brandishing preposterous pejoratives doesn't count.Again, this is the pharisee belief. You are simply acknowledging that you follow their teachings
There is admittedly one way for preterism to not be a heresy and to be a legitimate prophecy. And that is of course if Nero figured out the secrets of time travel to warp into the future to fight Murica!Denying the fact that prophecy is future-telling is definitely bad hermaneutics.
You know.....like denying the obvious prophetic implications of Romans 11:25 for example.
Rom 11:25 - For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
And to get back to the topic, I'd note that while this might seem a troll or outlandish, let's remember, Iran's leader is literally a cardboard cutout right now, stranger things could happen.There is admittedly one way for preterism to not be a heresy and to be a legitimate prophecy. And that is of course if Nero figured out the secrets of time travel to warp into the future to fight Murica!