Too bad they don't use science to defend their position. There has been a lot of studies showing religion is good for mental health...but the religion has to have specifics....like not hating unbelievers..."And parents of course have concerns and a say, but they don’t have the right to shield their children from knowledge,” Krauss said. “That’s not a right any more than they have the right to shield their children from health care or medicine. And those parents that do that are often tried and imprisoned when they refuse to allow their children to get blood transfusions or whatever is necessary for their health. And this is necessary for their mental health.”
"We want to protect up and comers against indoctrination by inculcating them ourselves," is essentially what they're proposing.
The sentiments expressed in that article by Dawkins and Krauss don't scream objective reasoning so much as they do atheistic bias, as far as how I infer this. Both intelligent, respectable guys in their own right, still. The passive aggressive virulence just seems kind of palpable to me. This is the kind of behavior that would lead me to home school my offspring (if I ever had any of my own) - this coming from someone who's not a Christian, even.
I respect their position, but it's like... you guys don't like religion. You don't like Christianity or the Bible. We get it already. Can you get back to science and maybe take a backseat to trying to destroy people's faith?
me and my wife have decided to homeschool for this exact reason.This is surprisingly becoming more common.
Although home-schooling is a movement that was predominently founded by evangelical parents and picked up by other religious groups, it seems that more and more "secular" families are beginning to home school. I think it's partially because the numbers definitely support that home schooled kids tend to get a better education, but also even some secular families are unhappy with the clear indoctrination that happens within public education.
You know... you sound a bit like them.This is how they operate. They introduce their... mythology and atheist fantasies as facts. First they manipulate secularism to gain acceptance. Then they start claiming you're delusional if you don't believe in their atheist fairytales. Then they start trying to brainwash your children. Then they push the truth from the schools and society. Then they start impressing upon the State to persecute you for not letting your own children get brainwashed by them. This is what happens when you let all these damnable heresies in...
You know... you sound a bit like them.![]()
reminds me of how Nazi Germany was able to get so many people to turn against the Jews.This is how they operate. They introduce their old earth mythology and atheist fantasies as facts. First they manipulate secularism to gain acceptance. Then they start claiming you're delusional if you don't believe in their atheist fairytales. Then they start trying to brainwash your children. Then they push the truth from the schools and society. Then they start impressing upon the State to persecute you for not letting your own children get brainwashed by them. This is what happens when you let all these damnable heresies in. It's the give a mouse a cookie parable. You gave them the cookie by letting them teach their heresies as if they were truth, but it does not stop there, they want more than the cookie.
reminds me of how Nazi Germany was able to get so many people to turn against the Jews.
my conversation with an atheist
atheist.."im an atheist"
Me "Bye"
my conversation with an atheist
atheist.."im an atheist"
Me "Bye"
Umm but atheism is a religion too, a belief in evolution and science and that
we all evolved from some sort of primordial stew.
So if Richie is going to teach his children about his religion, then why
shouldn't every other parent be afforded the same courtesy.
Just for the record I hate "religion" too.![]()
Sorry, wasn't able to edit my above post, so please allow me to make a succinct caveat to my above post: Also, Richard Dawkins happens to be an amazing writer on the subject of evolution. I'm not going to comment on his atheistic God Delusion book, but if you actually read works like The Selfish Gene or The Ancestors Tale, I can't imagine how someone couldn't not only be impressed by the skillful manner in which he writes (almost poetic), but also be persuaded into accepting evolutionary theory. Those that don't accept it, I'm just curious where you got your PHD in evolutionary biology? You may THINK you understand it, but do you really? A great book to start with would actually be Dawkins' "The Greatest Show On Earth" which is a guide through the evidence and the reason why 99.999% of biologists accept it as fact. He shows his masterful teacher skills by raising questions and letting you come to your own conclusions, not by telling you how to think. A great companion piece is Jerry Coyne's "Why Evolution Is True". Those books, among many others, changed my life. And I really hope none of these words come across as invidious. Thank you.