Rightly Divided Bible 'Contrasts'

[GRACE_ambassador]

Bible Contrasts:

1)


2)


3)


4)


5)


6)

7)


8)


9)


10)


To be cont'd in 11)...

 

[GRACE_ambassador]

Bible Contrasts continued:

11)

-------------------------
GRACE And Peace...

 

[p_rehbein]

Stopped at the paragraph where water baptism is said to be required for salvation. Neither Jesus, nor the Apostle Paul taught this......... just saying

 

[GRACE_ambassador]

Stopped at the paragraph where water baptism is said to be required for salvation. Neither Jesus, nor the Apostle Paul taught this......... just saying

Thanks, appreciate you "just saying" this; you "agreed with SAVED WITH
WORKS," and then just "stopped at water baptism"? What do we then do with
These Scriptures that "agree with SAVED WITH WORKS"?:

​

"And all the people that heard him, and the publicans, justified​

God, being baptized with the baptism of John. But the Pharisees​

and lawyers rejected The Counsel of God against themselves,​

being not baptized of him." (Luke_7:29-30) Was it required?​

Why would "JESUS Command the eleven (later twelve)":

"He that believeth AND is baptized Shall Be Saved..."​

(Mark_16:16); Was it required?​

Did Peter not obey his commission, as "JESUS Instructed," or
did he change it into something else, as many (who claim
THE SAME commission) do today?:

​

"Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one​

of you in The Name of Jesus Christ FOR the remission of sins,​

and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." (Acts 2:38)​

[man: "baptism WAS NOT required for salvation"]

God: "baptism Was Required FOR the remission of sins/salvation"
Under prophecy/law

Which do we believe?
+
Rightly Divided (2 Timothy 2:15) From “Things That Differ” (online)

Under MYSTERY/GRACE:

Yes, It Is True: [ONE] Paul, From Christ, "Was Not sent to [water]
baptize" as salvation is Now "GRACE Through faith," With The
ONE Baptism By The Holy Spirit For Salvation, Today, Correct?

GRACE And Peace...