If any of yous all missed perfection today, well then, you're not alone. Just keep looking forward to it.
I am not being combative, rather I am being attacked for believing in holiness and I have been defending my conviction and experience. There is a difference. Calling me a jerk is not helping or edifying. Just because we differ gives you no right to attack me so, it's not the way of love. I forgive you.Given your combative nature, are you sure you didn't take a wrong turn somewhere? You should be in the Bible Discussion Forum. That's where they browbeat people and call them not REAL Christians and take so much umbrage that we have to start importing umbrage from other countries to shore up the supply.
I'm not saying this thread is wrong. One should live without sin. Romans 6 makes that very clear.
But your manner of expressing it here in this thread, that is VERY wrong. You are here to start fights. I think you are deliberately looking for them. I know for certain that you are enjoying them.
How about Romans 6?Our Sunday school class is going through a book called "Respectable Sins" by Jerry Bridges.
The point of the book is that all sin, no matter how big or how small, whether committed intentionally or out of ignorance, is against a holy God.
However, the book also says that our only hope is in Christ and He is our Advocate with the Father when we do sin.
Nowhere in Scripture does it say that believers can (or should) stop sinning altogether. If we could do that, we would be "perfect men" as James says (cf. James 3). The only perfect Man is Christ Himself.
Saying I forgive you is the kind of passive-aggressive crap that people pull out a lot on the bdf.I am not being combative, rather I am being attacked for believing in holiness and I have been defending my conviction and experience. There is a difference. Calling me a jerk is not helping or edifying. Just because we differ gives you no right to attack me so, it's not the way of love. I forgive you.
Peace.
don't forget sins of omission meaning when we are supposed to care for the elderly or when our spirit tells us to assist someone & we don't, that's sin of omission!Hi Suze,
You are right, we do not all have the same definition for sin, hence the confusion.
Sin is twofold, a transgression against God's law and secondly, an inner pollution or depravity.
In regard to the first, I like John Wesley's definition of sin, 'a voluntary transgression against a known law of God'.
The question that needs asking as a believer, is voluntarily transgressing God's known law a necessity or a choice?
If, a choice, can then the grace of God keep me from making the wrong choice?
If, I can be kept from making the wrong choice for a minute, why not an hour, why not a day, why not a month?
I ask you, and others to ponder on these things.
Sin is also to know to do good and not do it. Also, anything not of faith is Sin.I am not pleading any ignorance. Just stating that sin is a willful transgression against a known law of God. Since I was entirely sanctified, I have not done that.
Jesus when asked which was the greatest commandment, answered:I don't knowingly, transgress the known law of God.
Are you claiming sinless perfection?You do not know me to make such a judgement or the power of God to keep one from sin.
Who is seeking to justify sinfulness? Those who are born of God practice righteousness and not sin. 1 John 3:9 - No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. 1 John 3:10 - By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.I have noticed that none of you have responded to the Scriptures I posted.
How can you justify your sinfulness in the light of these verses?
All that you have posted is contradicted by those verses.
It's time to give up your sinning and your dishonoring the Lord Jesus Christ.
Yes, I love the Lord with my whole being and my neighbor as myself. The Lord has cleansed me from ALL sin (1 Jn 1:7) and ALL unrighteousness (1 Jn 1:9). 'For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free from the law of sin and death'. Rm 8:2.Jesus when asked which was the greatest commandment, answered:
(Mar 12:30-31 NKJV) AND YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, WITH ALL YOUR MIND, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH.' This is the first commandment. And the second, like it, is this: 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.' There is no other commandment greater than these."
Can you say that you love God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength for every waking moment of every day? I know I can't. We should seek by God's grace to obey more and more as we go on in our Christian lives, This is what is meant by sanctification. It's to Christians that John writes:
(1Jn 1:8-9 NKJV) If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
John wasn't addressing Gnostics. He said: "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." He includes himself. He doesn't claim sinlessness.Yes, I love the Lord with my whole being and my neighbor as myself. The Lord has cleansed me from ALL sin (1 Jn 1:7) and ALL unrighteousness (1 Jn 1:9). 'For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free from the law of sin and death'. Rm 8:2.
1 Jn 1:8 was aimed at not Christians but the Gnostic false teachers that were within the Church.
What I experience is the reality of what Paul wrote of in Romans 6. It is salvation to the uttermost.
As you wish. It is 3am here in Sydney and I am suffering from insomnia. All I can say David, is if you get hold of a good commentary on First John you will find the context to the book is Gnostics infiltrating John's churches.John wasn't addressing Gnostics. He said: "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." He includes himself. He doesn't claim sinlessness.
I totally agree with you. In Jer. 31:31-34, the reason why God brings in a new law is because the people of Israel have broken the old law. What does it imply? It implies that people having the new law should not be breaking the law. Not breaking the law happens only by the grace of God and not by our efforts. Jam. 4:6 says that God gives grace to the humble. Therefore, our goal is to be humble. How can we be humble? As Mat. 16:24 says, we must deny ourselves, take up our cross and follow Jesus."Sinning religion is the belief that Christians cannot avoid sin, that in fact, every Christian sins' in thought, word, and deed' every day. This pessimism concerning the possibilities of the Christian life is very pervasive and widespread, among Lutherans, Reformed, and even some Arminians. Not all would express themselves as crassly or extremely, but they share one thing in common- a doubt concerning the adequacy of grace to save from sinning in the practical wear and tear of everyday life.
The sinning religion complex is rooted not only in an inadequate doctrine of grace, and a radically erroneous doctrine of the Atonement, but also in a faulty doctrine of sin. That the man out of grace is a mass of corruption is undeniable, but that he remains such as a Christian makes mockery of the saving power of Christ and insults the sanctifying efficacy of the Holy Spirit's influences. But this affront to the power of grace is due in part to (1) the hangover of Augustinism's attachment of sinfulness in the physical body, and (2) the notion that sin is to be defined by the letter of the law rather than by the spirit. Those who cannot see the moral difference between sins and mistakes, or between the disease of sin and its scars, or between a carnal disposition and human infirmities, will of course have no place for any true freedom from sin.
The conclusion is that for Christians to talk about continual or even frequent sinning is no credit to them, and certainly a dishonor to their Lord. Only one biblical advice is to be given to sinners: Stop it!
From Beacon Dictionary of Theology.
Not sinless perfection, that one can reach a place in Christ where we cannot sin. But rather, Christian perfection, that through the love of God reigning in the heart, we need not sin. Please read my commentary of Rom 6 post # 49 for my view on the Christian and sin.Are you claiming sinless perfection?
Who is seeking to justify sinfulness? Those who are born of God practice righteousness and not sin. 1 John 3:9 - No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. 1 John 3:10 - By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.
Now this does not mean that Christians are sinless, without fault or defect, flawless, 100% of the time, exactly like Jesus Christ. 1 John 1:8 - If we say that we have no sin, (present tense) we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say that we have not sinned, (past tense) we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us.
I hope you get a better sleep tonight. God bless you, too.As you wish. It is 3am here in Sydney and I am suffering from insomnia. All I can say David, is if you get hold of a good commentary on First John you will find the context to the book is Gnostics infiltrating John's churches.
With that, I am going back to bed to try and get some sleep. God bless.
Although the false teachings that John was combating may have been associated with Gnosticism, you are correct that John was not addressing Gnostics. John was addressing believers in 1 John 1 and in 1 John 2:1 referred to them as "my little children." John does include himself "we" in 1 John 1:8-10.John wasn't addressing Gnostics. He said: "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." He includes himself. He doesn't claim sinlessness.