V
Viligant_Warrior
Guest
My friend, I'm not certain where you get this idea, but I don't believe it is correct. Disciples of the apostles carried forth the Gospel as taught to them by their mentors. Preaching such as that done in Athens, for example, actually is teaching, and when people came to Paul after such a message, he expounded on it -- he taught them.For the first many centuries of the churches growth there was no such thing as going to a school or college to learn God's word.
It was a relationship-based teaching as opposed to formal theological training, but as heresies arose in the second and third centuries, it became necessary for church leadership to establish a theological foundation so as to define proper biblical instruction. This is completely in line with Scripture, which refers to Jesus as "Teacher" 48 times, and the implication of Jesus' parting words is that when they made a disciple, they were to be taught.
Matthew 28, NASB
20 [ . . . ] teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always *, even to the end of the age."
20 [ . . . ] teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always *, even to the end of the age."
I'm sorry to contradict you, Ken, but the Bible clearly shows that the apostles engaged in a ministry of teaching the Gospel, and the expectations of the believer.For it was given as the bible says it is given, and that is by God through the Holy Spirit to believers.
1 Corinthians 12
28 And God has appointed in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues. [emphasis added]
28 And God has appointed in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues. [emphasis added]
In the next verse, Paul specifically includes teachers among those of special office, as he asks if all are first apostles, then if all are prophets, and the if all are teachers. Obviously he anticipates the acknowledgement that no, not all have these appointments. Therefore, the offices mentioned have purpose in the church. Certainly if tongues were from the beginning, as I think you believe, then so teachers were also, is that not right?
If that passage isn't enough to convince, I would point out that he first named teaching as a special appointment in Romans 12:8, 7, and he repeats these same five offices in Ephesians 4:11. In light of all this, Ken, I again apologize for contradicting your post, but it certainly appears there are solid grounds for believing teaching is an office in the church, and while I agree the revelation must come by the power of the Holy Spirit, rarely if ever today does He imbue a believer directly.
After all, is it not true that ...
Romans 10
17 [ . . . ] faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ [?]
17 [ . . . ] faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ [?]
How will they hear if no one preaches or teaches, Ken? I don't mean to be disrespectful with this question, because a question is all it is, but, did the Holy Spirit give you the word directly, or did someone teach it to you?