Thanks GWH. These scriptures you quoted are good examples of how scripture can hold meaning not often realized. For example, Num 33:13 contains two proper noun names. Dophkah meaning 'knocking' and Alush meaning I will knead (bread). So, the scripture could read "And they departed from knocking, and encamped in I will knead bread." Further, after they removed from Alush, they camped at Rephidim, which means 'rests'. It is easy to see that this can have spiritual meaning relating to the gospel. For example, we know the scripture, "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." Also, "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:" Certainly, I find it interesting that after knocking, bread occurs (Jesus is the bread of life) and rest occurs (Jesus is our rest).
Concerning the passage from Lev 19:27: "Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard." We should remember that Jesus is the cornerstone. The corner is important, then. So much so that the corners of a field of grain were to be left for the poor, the stranger, the needy who could find mercy. The corners of the altar are the place of strength, mercy, and refuge. The four corners represent Jesus in all directions and he has a four-fold nature as an ox, an eagle, a man, and a lion in parable language. Hair in the Bible is apparently a covering and speaks of the prophet or the word. So, perhaps this scripture is indicating not to remove the covering of the gospel from those who need mercy, nor to remove Jesus.
However these verses are to be interpreted, this is exactly what I am talking about when I say that the traditions of men have made the word of God of no effect. The whole Bible is talking about Jesus, not the New Testament only, and not just a few select verses of the Old Testament.
I like your creative interpretations, although I will want more specific and obvious relevance for inclusion as a key OT verse.
IOW, my parameter for inclusion prefers exogesis rather than eisogesis.
I agree that the traditions of men tend to stifle Biblical hermeneutics and apologetics.
I may check with you the next time I read Leviticus and Numbers.
Thanks.