I know one gay person. I think they are normal people so should be accepted, but that does not mean that they should have all possible rights regarding family.
Liberals, can you tell me what "
accepted" means to you?
Does accept mean we shouldn't stone them to death?
Or
Does it mean we should accept their behavior as equal to that of a heterosexual person?
If it's the first choice, everyone here on this forum that I've seen "accepts" homosexuals, and we don't want to kill them. We just reject their sins and will truthfully tell them our opinions on the matter if the subject arises.
If it's the second choice, we can't do that as it is not true and we are not instructed to. Even if we know one, two, or three gay people, we can't exercise personal judgement on the matter and overrule what is plainly written. An abomination is an abomination for eternity, the NT doesn't change that.
We all accept them as a human being, and I DON"T UNDERSTAND WHY "ACCEPT" IS REPEATED OVER AND OVER.
Do you see people here saying we should kick them out of society or kill them? Then why are you declaring they should be accepted as human beings? I think this mentality comes from people who don't have the spine to challenge political correctness, so instead you just pretend the behavior is ok for other people to do, and then live in a bubble free of responsibility as all hell breaks loose on earth.
"accept". If you using this word to say we shouldn't kill or punish, stop doing that because it's a ridiculous thing to say when no one is even hinting at doing so. If you are saying we should actually allow the behavior and think of it as ok, then you are wrong. There is no reason to ever use "accept" in regards to homosexuality. Get over the posters and talking points you have learned from the media.