The Real Antichrist For The End

[ewq1938]

I read your blog at the other forum which is basically the same as what you wrote here, and even there, no one agrees with you. They all even posted the verses that show that this man will be real.

I don't know how you can miss what is already spelled out in scripture that no one else misses. 🤷


🥌

I have noticed similar teachings about the antichrist/man of sin etc.

Doctrines like Pre-trib teach the church will be gone, so they don't worry about the antichrist or look for any of the signs of his arrival.

Various forms of Preterism including Amillennialism teach the antichrist already came in the past so there is no need to watch for him now.

Other doctrines teach that the antichrist isn't a singular man, or that denominations like the RCC and it's Papacy are the antichrist which is a mis-identification of the last and final antichrist and antichrist type system.

All false doctrines teach some version of doctrine where it's adherents need not worry about or watch for the not-yet-here antichrist. Seems like a great thing for satan to introduce into the churches so his antichrist (whoever he is) can slip right in and deceive those not watching. The antichrist is also known as a false christ and that is the most dangerous thing not to be knowledgeable about in the endtimes because of the apostasia (the Apostasy).

So, not watching for the antichrist or not believing in a singular future AC or thinking something/someone else is the antichrist can result in one being deceived and possibly committing Apostasy.

That is extremely dangerous. Beware!

 

[WilliamL]

-- Jesus is saying (in your verse ^ ) "FOR many...," because in the previous verse He had just spoken of the "individual-person" He's wanting them to be IN PARTICULAR aware of and cautioned about...

... there in the previous verse, He'd said, "tis - G5100 - 'A CERTAIN ONE ['a certain one' BRINGING DECEPTION]' "

...So He's saying beware of "A CERTAIN ONE

Incorrect, but creative. Tis is an "indefinite masculine pronoun," not a definite one, like you try to use it. Not a single Bible interprets it here the way you do.

CONSIDER:

--that the phrase "YE HAVE HEARD" is a phrase used elsewhere that specifically POINTS BACK to subjects having been written already in the OT; for example,

Nothing in the OT speaks of anyone named "the Anti-Messiah."

Bottom line, you keep ignoring the words of Jesus Hiimself:

Matt. 24:5 “For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,' ..." So, MANY false/anti-Christs, not a single one. Can't escape it; can't rely on a rumor having no direct reference to any Scripture or person.

 

[WilliamL]

no one agrees with you. They all even posted the verses that show that this man will be real.

I don't know how you can miss what is already spelled out in scripture that no one else misses.

I don't pay any regard to what the popular vote about any doctrine is. If you do, then you will be deceived again and again.

Popular beliefs about the coming of the Messiah in the 1st century AD were wildly wrong. Why? Because 1) people like you were willing to follow the crowd, and 2) people tend to believe in what they want to happen, not what will be adverse to what they want to happen.

In the first century AD, what the Jews wanted was a conquering Messiah who would defeat their enemies and establish the Davidic Kingdom. I.e., little pain, lotsa gain. In the 21st century, what many Christians want is a pre-trib rapture, where they will be outta here before the really bad stuff affects them. Again, little pain, lotsa gain. But that won't happen either, and woe to those who have placed their faith in that outcome.

Bottom line is what I posted above: Jesus said MANY will come in His name. I'll take my stand upon His word, not popular opinion.

 

[TheDivineWatermark]

Incorrect, but creative. Tis is an "indefinite masculine pronoun," not a definite one, like you try to use it. Not a single Bible interprets it here the way you do.

Well, what you say here is a little misleading... because, well, take a look at another example (of MANY EXAMPLES we could look at), where the following verse (USING AN "INDEFINITE PRONOUN" [of G5100]) says:

-- https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/luk/13/23/t_conc_986023 - "Then said one [G5100 - tis - X-NSM (indefinite pronoun)] unto him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And he said unto them," - Luke 13:23 (where this is speaking of a particular person without specifically naming / labeling him);






An example from "Scribbr [dot] com" of an "indefinite pronoun" is the sentence saying,

"Someone told me you like to play chess."

- https://www.scribbr.com/nouns-and-pronouns/indefinite-pronouns/ (speaking of a particular person);




[Also from the web...] "Indefinite pronouns are pronouns that refer to someone or something in a general way, without being specific. They allow for discussions without specifying exact details."




Yes, so just because Jesus wasn't giving a specific NAME or LABEL to [the "G5100" in this text--Mt24:4 / Mk13:5], doesn't mean that it is saying what you are wanting it to convey (and suggesting it does);


I maintain that "the beginning of birth PANGS [PLURAL]" *ARE* the "SEALS" of Rev6 (at the START of the Trib yrs)... and that therefore the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" OF THESE BoBPs (Jesus spoke of) CORRESPONDS WITH the (Rev6:2) rider on the white horse WITH A BOW ("bow" often meaning "DECEPTION"--which would ALSO tie into this what Paul speaks to in 2Th2:9,10a[,4a]... which verse CONNECTS back to the individual being spoken of in Daniel 11:36-37 [with its "regime-change" language/wording ('there's a new sheriff in town,' so to speak)], etc etc)





One could furthermore search through this LIST (looking only at the "G5100 - someone" in this LIST) and see the many times in the nasb that this "INDEFINITE PRONOUN" [G5100] is used (speaking of a particular person),
...LIKE in the Luke 13:23 example I supplied above
- https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=someone&t=NASB20&ss=1#s=s_primary_0_2

 

[2ndTimeIsTheCharm]

Bottom line is what I posted above: Jesus said MANY will come in His name. I'll take my stand upon His word, not popular opinion.

-

I'm not pre-trib.

Your view is not popular because it doesn't stand upon His word - you lack His discernment and won't be able to recognize the actual antichrist that His word speaks of. That's nothing to be proud about.

If you can't even see something that basic in the Bible, what other things in the Bible are over your head? This is why no one listens to you.


🧇