The Rejection of Obedience

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
"Endure to the end" sounds like I finish what Jesus started.

Along with the fact that verse is about the coming siege of Jerusalem, the end of the age of the law and the Temple and surviving it physically.
really ignorant because this is repeated in the book of revelation. read your bible!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Ecclesiastes 1​

9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
 
The whole bible is prophecy. God made everything in 6 days and rested on the 7th. We've been here 6 days.

Exodus 20​

9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

The last verse of Matthew 16..

28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Matthew 17​

1 And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,
2 And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
3 And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.

Study the third day, Jesus was here 2 days ago. It's everywhere, even Exodus... My signature is one. This post could go on for a very long time.

Exodus 19​

11 And be ready against the third day: for the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of all the people upon mount Sinai.
12 And thou shalt set bounds unto the people round about, saying, Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death:
13 There shall not an hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live: when the trumpet soundeth long, they shall come up to the mount.
14 And Moses went down from the mount unto the people, and sanctified the people; and they washed their clothes.
15 And he said unto the people, Be ready against the third day: come not at your wives.
16 And it came to pass on the third day in the morning, that there were thunders and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount, and the voice of the trumpet exceeding loud; so that all the people that was in the camp trembled.
17 And Moses brought forth the people out of the camp to meet with God; and they stood at the nether part of the mount.

And from Jesus

Luke 13​

31 The same day there came certain of the Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence: for Herod will kill thee.
32 And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.

John 2​

1 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there:
2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage.
 

2 Peter 3​

3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Christ
Why such the overt rejection of it?

Hello! It's the times we're living in, the times foretold in the Bible, the End Times when all the old sureties in society and especially in the church are breaking down.

Salvation is by grace, but those who have found the pearl of great price are all in, here I am and I have come to do your will oh Lord. But here are the times we're living in:

2 Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.

We're living in times when popular authors say all sorts of things to obfuscate the clear teachings of the bible.

God Bless You :)
 
I am of the ISAS crowd, If saved always saved. The reason for this negative reaction is because most of Christianity is stuck in romanism till this day. You must perform for your salvation and if you do enough good works you may make it, then again maybe not and maybe you will have to go to purgatory for a while. The pentecostals, methodists and many others aren't romanists but they side with the RCC on the core topic of the reformation which was justification.

I can only speak for myself, there is no rejection of obedience but a concern for the Gospel. If you have no promises but only warnings, you are going to burn yourself out and go full force into the world. I have seen it happen many times.
While I was referring to the people that are very direct that obedience isn't required there for, it doesn't matter if you do it, you'll still get to heaven (I gave my father as an example but I've heard it from so many people), I do understand the other crowd that feels as though walking in obedience feels as if you're earning salvation, and there for classify it as legalism or having no promises.

But the "gospel" includes what Jesus said, who advocated for obedience (Jesus was perfect in His obedience, hence why He knew no sin). So to reject obedience is rejecting the gospel (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John tend to be what people refer to as "the gospel"). I think what ends up happening is that so many people/denominations alter definitions or have their own personal definition of words so when you say "gospel" someone else is going to have a different view of that same word. Same with a lot of other words people reference.

But as far as no promises, God promised that if you follow him (walking in obedience through his commands, which incorporates a lot of aspects, not just what people call the law, but also faith and trust in Him), you will be saved. So it's not that obedience doesn't have promises, its that there seems to be this continued view point (perpetuated by some protestant denominations) that any form of obedience, automatically equals legalism which automatically shines a negative view on obedience in general. Like it's a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2Christ and Soyeong
Hello! It's the times we're living in, the times foretold in the Bible, the End Times when all the old sureties in society and especially in the church are breaking down.

Salvation is by grace, but those who have found the pearl of great price are all in, here I am and I have come to do your will oh Lord. But here are the times we're living in:

2 Timothy 4:3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.

We're living in times when popular authors say all sorts of things to obfuscate the clear teachings of the bible.

God Bless You :)
Hi there! Amen and I agree. God bless you too! Thanks for sharing :)
 
IMO, the word "Torah" has been habitually thrown out and misrepresented as the law. I've engaged in a light study of The Hebrew and even the introductory exposure to it reveals a great deal. Each letter is also a picture as well as a number and no other written language offers this 'three that perfectly agree' component to it so that, if understood correctly, the meaning of "Torah" encompasses so much more than just the law. This is the "picture of it" that I see, roughly translated considering the clumsiness of translating spirit into the natural; the righteous cross the ruler breathed out.
You are correct. The term "Torah" doesn't exclusively mean "Law". It literally means "instructions." The Torah includes the Law, yes, but it also includes "The Writings" and "The Prophets."

As we read the New Testament, we might run into the phrase "the law and the prophets" or another phrase, "the Law, the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings." These are idiomatic phrases that refer to the Torah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mammabird
I've noticed over the decades such a negative reaction to the idea of obedience which tends to stem from the OSAS crowd.

For sake of argument, let's take salvation off the table because I don't want to turn this into a salvation debate. I want the sole focus to be about obedience.

Why, is there such a rejection for obedience? Like, if you bring it up, people just get auto-defensive and start yelling about works. But what happened to not doing something you shouldn't do, because you literally just shouldn't do it?

If God is likened to the aspect of a Father, why do we grow up as kids following our parents, but when it comes to the Father, it's like.. "I don't have to follow the rules."

Throughout scripture from old testament to new, God has been the same. He HATES sin. The message for repentance is prevalent from start to finish in scripture. Hell, the tribulation period is literally due to sin and how abundant it is everywhere. So why the reaction? Why such a distinct defensive response to something that God wants/likes? Why such the overt rejection of it?
Well because don't want the truth. But contiune to post truth.
 
Just as a FYI. The name is Martin Luther. Not Luber.
Just for your information Martin was born under his father's last name which was Luder. Martin later changed his name.
Martin Luther changed his last name from "Luder" to "Luther" in the mid-1510s. This change was significant for several reasons:

Scholarly Identity: By adopting the name "Luther," he distanced himself from his peasant roots and aligned himself with the scholarly and reformative movements within the Church

Meaning of the Name: The name "Luther" is thought to be derived from the Latin "Eleutherius," meaning "the free one," which resonated with his beliefs about Christian freedom

Historical Context: The name change had already occurred by the time he posted his Ninety-Five Theses in 1517, indicating its importance in his public identity as a reformer
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delvianna
There is a serious danger in the definition you have given because it quietly changes what Jesus actually taught.

No one disagrees that pride, self-righteousness, and trusting in yourself are wrong. Jesus repeatedly condemned those things. But He never called obedience "legalism." In fact, He consistently taught that obedience is the evidence of genuine faith and love for God.

You say those in Matthew 7 were "doing God's will apart from a relationship with Jesus." That is not what Jesus said. Jesus gave the reason for rejecting them: "I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity." (Matthew 7:23, ASV). Their problem was that they practiced lawlessness, not that they obeyed too much.

Likewise, the Pharisee in Luke 18 was not condemned because he obeyed God's commandments. He was condemned because he trusted in himself and despised others. Humility was missing, not obedience.

That's right. Obedience itself is not legalism and Jesus would never say that obedience is legalism. But my definition includes a provision you seem to ignore. Legalism is obedience for the wrong reason or with the wrong attitude and Jesus is critical of both.
The greatest danger is that the word "legalism" becomes so broad that anyone urging Christians to obey Jesus can be dismissed as a legalist. Jesus never did that. Instead, He said, "If ye love me, ye will keep my commandments." (John 14:15, ASV), and, "Why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?" (Luke 6:46, ASV).
This particular danger can be avoided if you take someone's word in context. @mailmandan did not mean to suggest that Christians should not obey Christ. I don't think anyone here is suggesting that we should disobey Christ. Our discussion centers on the question of WHAT did Jesus ACTUALLY command? When Jesus said, "If you love me, you will obey my commandments," some mistakenly conclude that Jesus is addressing the Mosaic Law or specifically The Ten Commandments. But that is NOT what he means by keeping his commandments. His statement is focused on HIS teaching.
Even Romans 10 does not teach that obedience is the problem. Israel's error was seeking righteousness while rejecting the Messiah to whom the Law pointed. Faith in Christ and obedience to Christ are not enemies. Jesus joined them together.
Yes. But again, discussions on message boards rarely, if ever, question whether a Christian should obey Jesus' teaching. For instance, Jesus tells us that if we are commanded to carry a load for a mile, then carry it for two miles instead. I have never seen a debate about that. Jesus said that if someone strikes you on one cheek, turn the other cheek to him. I have never seen a debate about whether we should obey that. Understand?

The debate arises when someone insists that Christians are obligated to obey the Commandments that are part of God's covenant with Israel. Keeping the Sabbath Day Holy is a Jewish obligation, not an obligation on others.

The warning is simple: be careful not to invent a definition that Jesus never used. If obedience to Christ can be labeled "legalism," then people may begin to fear the very thing Jesus commanded. Scripture warns against practicing lawlessness, not against obeying the Lord.
Again, we are talking about why someone keeps a commandment and what attitude they adopt while they do it. Don't be like those who flatten the commandments, suggesting that it doesn't matter WHY we do what we do. ONLY thing that matters is that we DO them. That might sound like good advice, but it isn't Biblical.
 
That's right. Obedience itself is not legalism and Jesus would never say that obedience is legalism. But my definition includes a provision you seem to ignore. Legalism is obedience for the wrong reason or with the wrong attitude and Jesus is critical of both.

This particular danger can be avoided if you take someone's word in context. @mailmandan did not mean to suggest that Christians should not obey Christ. I don't think anyone here is suggesting that we should disobey Christ. Our discussion centers on the question of WHAT did Jesus ACTUALLY command? When Jesus said, "If you love me, you will obey my commandments," some mistakenly conclude that Jesus is addressing the Mosaic Law or specifically The Ten Commandments. But that is NOT what he means by keeping his commandments. His statement is focused on HIS teaching.

Yes. But again, discussions on message boards rarely, if ever, question whether a Christian should obey Jesus' teaching. For instance, Jesus tells us that if we are commanded to carry a load for a mile, then carry it for two miles instead. I have never seen a debate about that. Jesus said that if someone strikes you on one cheek, turn the other cheek to him. I have never seen a debate about whether we should obey that. Understand?

The debate arises when someone insists that Christians are obligated to obey the Commandments that are part of God's covenant with Israel. Keeping the Sabbath Day Holy is a Jewish obligation, not an obligation on others.


Again, we are talking about why someone keeps a commandment and what attitude they adopt while they do it. Don't be like those who flatten the commandments, suggesting that it doesn't matter WHY we do what we do. ONLY thing that matters is that we DO them. That might sound like good advice, but it isn't Biblical.
Roger316
Can you name the commandments of which you write?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roger316
Exactly! And He fullfilled it. He made us free.

The sad confusion between 'law keeping' and freedom in Christ crops up again and again and again in this forum. Obviously many do not seem to understand God tore the curtain from the top down and made us His Children in His Son.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkontner
So, you think that the new covenant is the old covenant written on our hearts even though God said it will not be the covenant they broke? Jeremiah 31:32

And you think that the manner that Christ walked is speaking about the "Torah," and that as you see it, even though the subject of the chapter is about the gospel and the new commandment which is the "old commandment which you have had from the beginning," that is, "the message that you have heard." (1John 2:7-8).

Never mind the question, this answers it.

Surely you don't mean to imply any of God's law to be unrighteous? Yet there are some you no longer need to pay any attention to? Psalm 119:160 says, "The entirety of Your word is truth, and all your righteous judgments endure forever." God has judged to make the render the law obsolete, with those that walk by it rather than walking in Christ, however much you's like to 'judge' that you are walking in Him. You've judged that you keep Him by keeping the Sabbath. But I keep the Sabbath by abiding in Him. But it's okay, I know you don't get that any more than I get your idea.

Your equating zealous for the law with zealous for good deeds, did you not continue reading after Acts 21:20? about Paul being persecuted by the Jews and his defense to the crowd of how he "was just as zealous" (Acts 22:3) and called the high priest a "whitewashed wall" being unaware that he was the high priest while fully aware of the law of Exodus 22:28? He was a Pharisee of Pharisees, after all, that knew the law better than the high priest! (Acts 23:3)

And you ignore the reference to the law of sin and death which Christ set you free from to go back to it so that you will, ultimately, be rendered obsolete along with it, decaying, growing old, and ready to vanish away (Hebrews 8:13).
So, you think that the new covenant is the old covenant written on our hearts even though God said it will not be the covenant they broke? Jeremiah 31:32

And you think that the manner that Christ walked is speaking about the "Torah," and that as you see it, even though the subject of the chapter is about the gospel and the new commandment which is the "old commandment which you have had from the beginning," that is, "the message that you have heard." (1John 2:7-8).

Never mind the question, this answers it.

Surely you don't mean to imply any of God's law to be unrighteous? Yet there are some you no longer need to pay any attention to? Psalm 119:160 says, "The entirety of Your word is truth, and all your righteous judgments endure forever." God has judged to make the render the law obsolete, with those that walk by it rather than walking in Christ, however much you's like to 'judge' that you are walking in Him. You've judged that you keep Him by keeping the Sabbath. But I keep the Sabbath by abiding in Him. But it's okay, I know you don't get that any more than I get your idea.

Your equating zealous for the law with zealous for good deeds, did you not continue reading after Acts 21:20? about Paul being persecuted by the Jews and his defense to the crowd of how he "was just as zealous" (Acts 22:3) and called the high priest a "whitewashed wall" being unaware that he was the high priest while fully aware of the law of Exodus 22:28? He was a Pharisee of Pharisees, after all, that knew the law better than the high priest! (Acts 23:3)

And you ignore the reference to the law of sin and death which Christ set you free from to go back to it so that you will, ultimately, be rendered obsolete along with it, decaying, growing old, and ready to vanish away (Hebrews 8:13).
Soyeng:
I read of your position that all must keep the Torah. That is a very difficult position because keeping Torah today will get you put in prison, potentially for life.
Torah: A man can have as many wives as he can afford and see as many prostitutes as pleases him, but if his wife commits adultery she must be put to death. Both debt and chattel slavery are endorsed, but a woman enslaved to a man over debt can never go free. If a women who claimed to be raped in a city and nobody heard her cry out, is put to death. A women raped in the country where nobody can hear her cry out is innocent. The ability to keep the Torah was destroyed when the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD and again permanently in 130 AD. Additionally, there is no evidence that anyone in Judea/Samaria kept the Torah prior to the start of the Synagogue system and the start of the Maccabean was around 250 BC. Prior to that there is no physical evidence of Torah knowledge or Torah practices in the Jewish population. After that time every evidence of Torah keeping widely seen in the Judean population. While there may have been some Torah-lite writings prior to the Babylonian captivity there is no evidence any every day Jew knew anything about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rewriter
No, but I think people are confused and forget that while Jesus was alive, He was living under OT law
pinebeach
That is an interesting perspective. Jesus followers frequently violated the Torah and Jesus defended their actions. The Gospels document several instances where religious leaders, particularly the Pharisees, accused Him of violating Sabbath laws. These accusations often arose from His healing activities and the actions of His disciples, such as picking grain on the Sabbath.
 
Soyeng:
I read of your position that all must keep the Torah. That is a very difficult position because keeping Torah today will get you put in prison, potentially for life.
Torah: A man can have as many wives as he can afford and see as many prostitutes as pleases him, but if his wife commits adultery she must be put to death. Both debt and chattel slavery are endorsed, but a woman enslaved to a man over debt can never go free. If a women who claimed to be raped in a city and nobody heard her cry out, is put to death. A women raped in the country where nobody can hear her cry out is innocent. The ability to keep the Torah was destroyed when the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD and again permanently in 130 AD. Additionally, there is no evidence that anyone in Judea/Samaria kept the Torah prior to the start of the Synagogue system and the start of the Maccabean was around 250 BC. Prior to that there is no physical evidence of Torah knowledge or Torah practices in the Jewish population. After that time every evidence of Torah keeping widely seen in the Judean population. While there may have been some Torah-lite writings prior to the Babylonian captivity there is no evidence any every day Jew knew anything about it.

And believing that keeping the Torah is God's requirement for salvation perverts the Gospel and might get you put in hell for heresy.
 
Good Morning Dave;

Dave, I think the question has shifted away from what Jesus actually said. You know, The Jesus who is the son of God, having all authority in Heaven and on earth? Yes that man, the main character in the bible with God whose words are eternal life!
I did not ask whether anyone keeps the commandments perfectly. None of us has, except Jesus. We all need God's mercy.My question was much simpler: Did Jesus teach those who want eternal life to keep God's commandments?

Jesus answered that Himself. "And behold, one came to him and said, Teacher, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why askest thou me concerning that which is good? One there is who is good: but if thou wouldest enter into life, keep the commandments." (Matthew 19:16-17, ASV). That is Jesus' answer, not mine.

Then notice that Jesus immediately began quoting from the Ten Commandments. "Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honor thy father and thy mother; and, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself." (Matthew 19:18-19, ASV). If Jesus believed the commandments no longer mattered, this was the perfect time to say so. Instead, He pointed directly to them. You quoted, "With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible."

You're missing the point that Jesus was making. And I never said that the commandments didn't matter, those would be the extremes that you paint that I mentioned earlier. Are you perfect, meaning without sin? Being 'perfect' is what the Law requires for justification. Because Jesus was perfect for us, we are justified by His life when we are placed into Him, the One True Church. Have you ever broken any of the commandments that Jesus listed in Matthew 19? If yes, you are not perfect for justification, and can never be. Therefore you cannot have eternal life based on your merits.

Jesus said to him, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me."

The prefect that justifies us before God is what Jesus did, since we have all failed already. (Romans 10:1-4) If you have broken one commandment, then you can no longer justify yourself because your life is not perfect. (James 2:10)

Outside of the context of justification, because justification requires perfection for ones whole life, being made perfect/mature is what happens to a person who is already justified. It's an evidence. Remember, being made perfect, practical sanctification, still does not qualify a person to be justified. Since we have all sinned, and all fall short of the glory of God. We, beginning with the Spirit (the source of good), are perfected/matured by that same Spirit to Christlikeness. It's an evidence, not a merit.

Galatians 3:2-3 This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?

It's the Spirit that gives life and makes us perfect, not the flesh (Romans 8:9-11). This is for believers who are indwelt and justified already. God gets the glory, not our flesh. It's the fruit of the Spirit, we do not get to merit this, since we have already failed.

The listeners of Jesus in that moment (Mathew 19) knew what He was saying. That's why they replied, "What then can man do?" (meaning, they knew it was impossible). Jesus, replied, "for what is impossible for man is possible for God". Not, what is impossible for man can be possible with God's help. For someone who is a stickler for sticking with what the text says, and not going beyond that, you have sure taken some liberties with that passage. Remember, the man who Jesus asked about the commandments said that He had kept them from his youth. That's a deliberate statement. Not, 'I became this way', rather, 'from the the time when I became accountable before the Law, I always kept these commandments'. When speaking of a state that one reaches as a result of being in Christ and already justified by what Jesus did, that perfection, or maturity does not justify us, nore can it, because the Law requires a lifetime of perfect obedience. What justifies is a lifetime of obedience, no sin, no not one.

You're taking evidences and applying them to justification. Scripture will not allow that. Perfect is used in both those senses in Scripture. In Mathew 19, Jesus is speaking of positional sanctification, or justification. In Galatians 3:2-3, Paul is speaking of practical sanctification.

Let's read that in context. Jesus was speaking about salvation being impossible by human effort alone. He was not saying obedience no longer matters. In fact, only a few verses earlier He had already told the rich young ruler to keep the commandments.

Can you please quote one person who said that obedience doesn't matter?

Jesus also said: If ye love me, ye will keep my commandments. (John 14:15, ASV)

That's an evidence statement, not a justification statement.

He did not say, "You cannot keep them, so do not worry about them." He said that love for Him is shown by obedience.

Again, with the false extremes.

Again He said: He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself unto him. (John 14:21, ASV)

Who is He that loves Him, but he who is justified. (1 Corinthians 1:8)

And again: If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love. (John 15:10, ASV)

Notice that Jesus presents Himself as the example. He kept His Father's commandments and calls us to do the same.

Jesus also warned that merely calling Him "Lord" is not enough. And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? (Luke 6:46, ASV)

Jesus concluded the Sermon on the Mount with these solemn words: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven. (Matthew 7:21, ASV)

The apostles whom Jesus personally chose taught exactly the same: And hereby we know that we know him, if we keep his commandments. He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. (1 John 2:3-4, ASV) So no, I am not saying we earn salvation by perfect obedience. Jesus never taught that.

I am saying exactly what Jesus taught: We are sinners who need God's grace, and those who truly believe in Him repent, follow Him, and keep His commandments. Obedience is not the cause of salvation, but neither is it optional. Jesus made obedience one of the marks of a true disciple.

My concern is very simple. Whenever there seems to be a conflict between someone's interpretation and the plain words of Jesus, I choose to stay with Jesus, I explained why at the beginning of my reply to you. What we have to do is simple Dave, it's to try to keep them as best we can and Ask God to help and he certainly will.

Try to understand the context of Jesus' words. These are evidences, not merit. You cannot deliver yourself from the penalty of sin. It's impossible. You cannot deliver yourself from the power of sin. It's impossible. You cannot conform yourself to Christlikeness, it's God who does that also. We call that last part the evidences of one who is already justified by what Jesus did. When we see someone being obedient, we see a person who is evidencing something. You can tell a tree by it's fruit. A good tree cannot bare bad fruit (the Holy Spirit), and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit (the flesh). That's why Jesus, in Matthew 19, speaking from His humanity (fully man) said "Why do you call Me good, God alone is good." And elsewhere, speaking from His Deity, said "I am the vine and you are the branches, without Me, you can do nothing [good]". You see, this obedience is God's gift to us, and not a merit that we can claim. The one who obeys God's commands is already justified, born again, and beginning to be conformed to what God already reckons him to be legally in Jesus Christ, perfect.

Dave