With all due respect to you, your basis for what you believe are illogical as well. You assume people who cannot hear, see, speak, cannot fulfill Gods will. God would surly make provisions for such people. However, for those who are able and choose to reject plain Biblical teaching, which seems to be your problem God will make no provisions (John 12:48).
Usually when folks jump to the attack mode it is because they have seen their error and can do nothing but attack the person. This is common in debates. Which is what you are doing now.
I did not call you foolish, but the questions you ask. You called me foolish which is a personal attack on me. It also angers me when folks say they believe the Bible but refuse to believe what it says. When folks begin asking the kind of questions you did, it is because that is a last ditch effort, because you cannot prove the Scriptures wrong. Christ refused to answer foolish questions at times, just read the Gospel accounts.
And using your own words I truly feel sorry for you, because you refuse to open your eyes and read the Scriptures. Do not believe it because I said it, reason from the Scriptures. That is how I came to the conclusions that I did.
I hope you have a good day, and that someday you may leave behind your preconceived ideas and read the Scriptures with a willing heart.
Usually when folks jump to the attack mode it is because they have seen their error and can do nothing but attack the person. This is common in debates. Which is what you are doing now.
I did not call you foolish, but the questions you ask. You called me foolish which is a personal attack on me. It also angers me when folks say they believe the Bible but refuse to believe what it says. When folks begin asking the kind of questions you did, it is because that is a last ditch effort, because you cannot prove the Scriptures wrong. Christ refused to answer foolish questions at times, just read the Gospel accounts.
And using your own words I truly feel sorry for you, because you refuse to open your eyes and read the Scriptures. Do not believe it because I said it, reason from the Scriptures. That is how I came to the conclusions that I did.
I hope you have a good day, and that someday you may leave behind your preconceived ideas and read the Scriptures with a willing heart.
I did not call you foolish. I said you appeared foolish. That is why I italicized the word "appear". And I'm really surprised you think I believe my arguments don't hold water and that that was because I was annoyed. To be honest, I was annoyed because of what I said. I couldn't believe anyone could make such illogical assumptions from Scripture, and now I have shown how such assumptions can be incorrect. Can you show me how they can be correct now?
The point of my post is that baptism is not necessary for salvation because it is separate from the Gospel (which saves). I have shown this using Scripture. And because baptism isn't needed to be performed every time one is saved, then this shows it is not always necessary for salvation. And if something is not always necessary then it is never necessary with regard to what saves (according to the very definition of the word "necessary"). It would then only serve a place of second importance with regard to the Gospel. The Gospel would be the thing that is necessary - baptism would be the thing that helps to bring some people to salvation on occasion.
So, I'm sorry for having been hard on you. I apologize. If you would like to answer my objections, then feel free to.
If you still believe that one must confess with their mouths, be baptized, etc. then please show me the provisions that God would make for those who would not have proper water or who would be unable to speak. Would God provide them with proper water? Would he heal them so they could speak?
I still feel that you are using baptism to drown people spiritually in the same way the unsaved Jews used circumcision to cut people off from Christ.