Its speaking of the book of the law which is what Moses wrote that was outside the ark of God's covenant Deut31:24-26so what does it say?
Its speaking of the book of the law which is what Moses wrote that was outside the ark of God's covenant Deut31:24-26so what does it say?
That would be covered under adultery- our LORD showed how wide that commandment covered- connecting thoughts of lust with adultery. All of them are very broad Psa 119:96 Jesus showed an examples of two of them but it applies to all Ten Mat5:19You post was about our obligation to the Ten. Bestiality isn’t of the Decalogue, it is covered in the Book of the Law. As are many other teachings that tell us what sin is.
When the Bible is the source of the debate you can not say we are using EWhites teachings. The Bible is from God and the verses shown are being rejected by people so stop using the denomination and EWhite as a pushing bag and excuse to reject GODS WORD.My mind is made up because of the research I’ve read and the experiments I’ve done myself with eating food.
I agree Adam was probably healthier but again you say “I know” when we have zero evidence of Adam’s health. You believe that because white claimed that Adam was twice as tall and had 20 times the vital force. Baseless claims from a false prophet. Just as vegetarianism being better is a baseless claim from the same false prophet.
Another baseless claim. Science never once taught that smoking was good for us. Lack of evidence against smoking was not evidence for it. And lobotomy isn’t removing part of the brain. It is severing the connection to the prefrontal cortex. Was it good? Of course not but without medications, other surgical options, or dietary research, it was seen as being better than keeping people confined in a straight jacket for the rest of their life.
Let’s look at who was the first to kill an animal on earth. That would be God Himself. Who was the first to favor meat over fruit? That would be God Himself. Who commanded that people eat meat for thousands of years? That would be God Himself. Get out of your sop and read the Bible. If you want to further expand your dietary knowledge, read actual research not just a flawed sda study.
Trust me I’m well aware of how diets can affect us mentally. I would be less worried about how a diet can affect me and more worried about how following a false prophet can affect me if I were you. A diet will affect this life. Following a false prophet will affect eternity.
This thread is over 6,000 posts into an argument over the 10 commandments. Plain scripture has been shown that we are no longer under mosaic law. You and your SDA friends refuse to take your ellen white goggles off and see any of it. Your mind is already made up.
That’s all you got from that? What’s it say about the new covenant?Its speaking of the book of the law which is what Moses wrote that was outside the ark of God's covenant Deut31:24-26
No, it wouldn’tThat would be covered under adultery- our LORD showed how wide that commandment covered- connecting thoughts of lust with adultery. All of them are very broad Psa 119:96 Jesus showed an examples of two of them but it applies to all Ten Mat5:19
Thanks... I quit wearing ball caps about 15-16 years ago. My first one of these was bought on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh... no, I didn't buy a kilt.... those things are pricey....Every idle word. And Not likely if that is you in the photo. Nice hat btw
Be careful ... in your wisdom.My mind is made up because of the research I’ve read and the experiments I’ve done myself with eating food.
Please, please never compare your false prophet with God.If you don't believe she is a prophet of God, so be it. That is your choice but God will reveal the Truth. Many people were sure that Jesus was a false prophet in His day.
2Cor3:3 from tablets of stone (only the Ten Commandments) to tablets of the heart.That’s all you got from that? What’s it say about the new covenant?
Where do you get “from tablets of stone” from 2Cor 3:32Cor3:3 from tablets of stone (only the Ten Commandments) to tablets of the heart.
the rest of the law of Moses are from the 10, if you follow these and Have the Holy Spirit, there is no way you would think if doing such a thing. However I agree that other laws that are good can certainly be kept and should.You post was about our obligation to the Ten. Bestiality isn’t of the Decalogue, it is covered in the Book of the Law. As are many other teachings that tell us what sin is.
No they are notthe rest of the law of Moses are from the 10, if you follow these and Have the Holy Spirit, there is no way you would think if doing such a thing. However I agree that other laws that are good can certainly be kept and should.
Deut 29 and 30 and the study on it Not 2cor 3.2Cor3:3 from tablets of stone (only the Ten Commandments) to tablets of the heart.
That’s all you got from that? What’s it say about the new covenant?
Did you read the post? From your question here I am not sure you did. Here is a copy that i posted on FB. It Should be the sameDo you think God wants us to offer lambs today and keep the laws that are shadows of the coming Messiah?
Good question, It doesn't say it.Where do you get “from tablets of stone” from 2Cor 3:3
“And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.”
2 Corinthians 3:3 ESV
Me too, Dutch, Irish, Scottish, English and Cherokee lol.Thanks... I quit wearing ball caps about 15-16 years ago. My first one of these was bought on the Royal Mile in Edinburgh... no, I didn't buy a kilt.... those things are pricey....
besides... I'm of Irish descent, only part Scotsman....![]()
Hi QTDeut 29 and 30 and the study on it Not 2cor 3.
FYI I am an sda.
2 Corinthians 3:3 does not say just the ten is in The heart.
Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
You claim it is just semantics, but Paul explicitly labels the laws engraved in stones as the ministry of death and says they were brought to an end to make room for the Spirit in 2 Corinthians 3:7-13. If the New Covenant were just the Sinai law moved to a different spot, God would not have said in Jeremiah 31:32 that the New Covenant is NOT according to the one He made at Sinai.Hi QT
I think we have met before on a different site.
Re: 2Cor3:3
Ink is what was written in books on scrolls- the Ten Commandments alone was written by the Spirit of the living God Exo31:18
The Ten Commandments is what was written on tablets of stone Deut4:13 Exo31:18 its not an arbitrary law they are speaking about, no longer on tablets of stone (external) but tablets of the heart (internal). 2Cor3:3 Heb8:10 Which is what the NC is about God's laws now written in the minds and hearts of His NC believers.
I think we are arguing semantics here - what we are keeping is the same, how we arrive to the conclusion is what differs.
Anyway, if you are who I think you are we have discussed this before so I probably won't continue and just agree to disagree. Good to see you.
Its not even in the same context of what was said- the context to what I was referring to as being semantics not what you are claiming which is why I don't bother responding anymore to your posts its fruitless and 2Cor3:3 has different context than 2Cor3:7-13 its speaking about the ministration, that changed, not the law 2Cor3:3 Heb8:10 Mat5:18-19You claim it is just semantics, but Paul explicitly labels the laws engraved in stones as the ministry of death and says they were brought to an end to make room for the Spirit in 2 Corinthians 3:7-13. If the New Covenant were just the Sinai law moved to a different spot, God would not have said in Jeremiah 31:32 that the New Covenant is NOT according to the one He made at Sinai.