Just wondered why spam is called spam.
Spam can actually be quite nice when in the confines of a tin
Pow, over my head
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Pow, over my head
Pow, over my head
It's a canned meat product that's been around for a loooooong time (maybe not in South Africa).
A
AgeofKnowledge
Guest
All I see is Sparkman refuting Sabbath Keeper's false doctrine. That's desirable so what is the problem? Am I missing something?
63-plus threads is overkill, A-ok.. I mean, seriously? He pulled forward more than that, I stopped counting after page 6. :/
D
DesiredHaven
Guest
I suppose if you will allow the side you might agree with to do that then set the bar equally for the other side of things to spam the same 60 OP's with a refute LOL
Whats fair is fair. When you saw it that day it was ;literally PAGES of law Sabbath threads no other threads could be found unless you went 6-7 pages deep in BDB to pull back up a more recent thread.
So are both sides equally allowed to spam that many threads at one time now?
Whats fair is fair. When you saw it that day it was ;literally PAGES of law Sabbath threads no other threads could be found unless you went 6-7 pages deep in BDB to pull back up a more recent thread.
So are both sides equally allowed to spam that many threads at one time now?
A
AgeofKnowledge
Guest
Is heresy and truth equitable? No. Is immorality and morality equitable? No.
Since evil and good are not equitable, I don't believe that it's "fair" to treat them as if they were.
For example, we don't have to give murderers the same "equality" as non-murderers. If we did, a lot more people would be murdered and we would have helped facilitate it making us indirectly guilty of murder too.
I disagree with your false assertion that affording those deceived by false religious systems and cults, heretics, apostates, and atheists "equality" on CC is necessary to be "fair."
It's also noteworthy that doing so violates this forum's rules, for good reason.
Since evil and good are not equitable, I don't believe that it's "fair" to treat them as if they were.
For example, we don't have to give murderers the same "equality" as non-murderers. If we did, a lot more people would be murdered and we would have helped facilitate it making us indirectly guilty of murder too.
I disagree with your false assertion that affording those deceived by false religious systems and cults, heretics, apostates, and atheists "equality" on CC is necessary to be "fair."
It's also noteworthy that doing so violates this forum's rules, for good reason.
D
DesiredHaven
Guest
I disagree with you putting all of your own "stuff" into my mouth with whatever the heck you are going on about.
A
AgeofKnowledge
Guest
I'm going on about your assertion to "set the bar equally for the other side of things" because "Whats fair is fair" (see post #25) which is not the right thing to do. It's not fair.
Posts that align with truth are desirable, posts that do not are not desirable. They are not "equitable" and should not be treated as if they are.
If you don't want to be corrected, then don't make incorrect statements.
If your sole objection is to someone reviving many threads on a single topic, despite their posts aligning with doctrinal orthodoxy, then restrict your objection to that and don't open the door to me correcting you by making false assertions.
Just say, I don't believe that someone should be permitted to find every thread in the Bible study forum on Sabbath keeping and respond to them with correct information.
He may have a reason for this motivation. Did you ask him why he was doing it? You know in church discipline you're supposed to go to the person first right? Perhaps he was deceived by the SDA and came to know the truth and is acting from a very real desire to see that others don't be deceived as they were. You should have communicated with this person before publicly complaining.
Posts that align with truth are desirable, posts that do not are not desirable. They are not "equitable" and should not be treated as if they are.
If you don't want to be corrected, then don't make incorrect statements.
If your sole objection is to someone reviving many threads on a single topic, despite their posts aligning with doctrinal orthodoxy, then restrict your objection to that and don't open the door to me correcting you by making false assertions.
Just say, I don't believe that someone should be permitted to find every thread in the Bible study forum on Sabbath keeping and respond to them with correct information.
He may have a reason for this motivation. Did you ask him why he was doing it? You know in church discipline you're supposed to go to the person first right? Perhaps he was deceived by the SDA and came to know the truth and is acting from a very real desire to see that others don't be deceived as they were. You should have communicated with this person before publicly complaining.
D
DesiredHaven
Guest
I dont have time for this, I didnt even read the spam I dont care to read a spammer.
If an admin will clarify we can spam threads because our stuff is true, great, lets go I will begin tommorrow with permission on 500 threads
But I will wait first ofcourse because I think its rude no matter how right I might be
BUT if its declared cool with the board I am so good at copy pasting (and rather fast at it) and I have lots of really true things to share.
I have no problem joining the spam team if the board will allow.
If an admin will clarify we can spam threads because our stuff is true, great, lets go I will begin tommorrow with permission on 500 threads
But I will wait first ofcourse because I think its rude no matter how right I might be
BUT if its declared cool with the board I am so good at copy pasting (and rather fast at it) and I have lots of really true things to share.
I have no problem joining the spam team if the board will allow.
A
AgeofKnowledge
Guest
I'm not saying that you don't have a point but rather qualifying what you're saying.
As an aside, a couple of your comments made me laugh in a good way. You have a humorous side. I never heard anyone use the term, "spam team" before. That's actually funny.
But seriously, I suppose if you believe what he did was spam then you should ask him to stop and tell him why in either a PM or in response to one of his posts publicly (somewhere he sees it).
If it persists, take it to the moderators and see what they say.
I would have been immediately with you had his doctrine been heretical and for that reason. But, it wasn't.
Yet, like I said, I think you do have a point in that one person probably shouldn't be turning the entire forum into a single issue discussion board.
But you should have followed the scriptural process for Christian discipline of another fellow Christian which always is to approach them first.
Peace.
As an aside, a couple of your comments made me laugh in a good way. You have a humorous side. I never heard anyone use the term, "spam team" before. That's actually funny.
But seriously, I suppose if you believe what he did was spam then you should ask him to stop and tell him why in either a PM or in response to one of his posts publicly (somewhere he sees it).
If it persists, take it to the moderators and see what they say.
I would have been immediately with you had his doctrine been heretical and for that reason. But, it wasn't.
Yet, like I said, I think you do have a point in that one person probably shouldn't be turning the entire forum into a single issue discussion board.
But you should have followed the scriptural process for Christian discipline of another fellow Christian which always is to approach them first.
Peace.
D
DesiredHaven
Guest
Listen, people were responding to him already (openly) and reporting him (as even as they stated openly) I come down here because I didnt even know how to find a moderator in this forum. Others said they were contacting mods for this as well as for a former troll who has been banned poster 3 times before this last one. I went to SK in private since there was no report button responses in those claiming to have reported him also.
SK can confirm I contacted him personally on that one, because I didnt know who else to contact, and he directed me to 4 mods or admins and told me 2 I might have better luck with being around, so I ended up contacting MrPineapple for that one. A couple of days later that particular troll was banned (for the fourth time)
I dont see how any grown man who knows his way around a forum that well is stupid to what he was doing (in my estimation). And that ofcourse is just my opinion and your world doesnt stand or fall at it, and Im not asking it to. But had this been done by someone whose beliefs were supposedly from the fruitcake factory people would be making him own up to the actual spamming (the horrors). Even if it was probably just a very young zealous (unrooted) babe in Christ, stamping his feet on days through 60 posts. That very move would be to the advantage of tossing the little fellow into the compost pile ("spamming" being the nail in his coffin)
Look, I wasnt looking for the man to be crucified but taken up with by a moderator since everyone else seemed to be ignored as they were pointing out. This post is just me of waving my hands in the air saying hey ((( over here ))) there appears to be a crazy man posting all over your forum, I dont think you desire this???
Thats all.
If they dont mind, thats great too.
I didnt come here to argue I come here to report spamming not answer to you on someone elses spam. My report button is broken and Im not the moderator here.
Its not my board or place to discipline a man my senior on doing what the average persons conscience should tell him is somewhat nutso behavior. And this is coming from someone is really okay with a little nutso (because I can be just that). I know this because people tell me this. I do have my own lines in the sand, and some folks lines are a little farther out than others (I get it).
You are entitled to disagree with me thats fine.
I was just putting my voice out there about the 6-7 pages deep of spam. Just in case anyone didnt "notice". We have folks who dont miss a speck on someone around here but miss that?
If you love you spam man then its yours (I wont argue with you) and I can serve it up too if you would like more of it.
It was just that if I could put that many pages on ignore so that they would fall back to where they come from (for me) I would chose that.
Im done though, I dont wish to go back and forth on this.
It was inconsiderate to other brothers and sisters in Christ who are also serving to refute other errors too, whereas you might make a single brothers valiant fight (over a day) much more valuable then others over a baby bottle topic? Copy pasted 60 times? To the point you cant find the other topics?
I started this to get someones attention after that, its not my business now.
I just wanted to make sure I understood spamming, like if there are new rules on it? Do we have new limitations if our stuff is true (and not false)?
Because I have a lot of helpful truths and I would like to spread them around a multitide of times.
SK can confirm I contacted him personally on that one, because I didnt know who else to contact, and he directed me to 4 mods or admins and told me 2 I might have better luck with being around, so I ended up contacting MrPineapple for that one. A couple of days later that particular troll was banned (for the fourth time)
I dont see how any grown man who knows his way around a forum that well is stupid to what he was doing (in my estimation). And that ofcourse is just my opinion and your world doesnt stand or fall at it, and Im not asking it to. But had this been done by someone whose beliefs were supposedly from the fruitcake factory people would be making him own up to the actual spamming (the horrors). Even if it was probably just a very young zealous (unrooted) babe in Christ, stamping his feet on days through 60 posts. That very move would be to the advantage of tossing the little fellow into the compost pile ("spamming" being the nail in his coffin)
Look, I wasnt looking for the man to be crucified but taken up with by a moderator since everyone else seemed to be ignored as they were pointing out. This post is just me of waving my hands in the air saying hey ((( over here ))) there appears to be a crazy man posting all over your forum, I dont think you desire this???
Thats all.
If they dont mind, thats great too.
I didnt come here to argue I come here to report spamming not answer to you on someone elses spam. My report button is broken and Im not the moderator here.
Its not my board or place to discipline a man my senior on doing what the average persons conscience should tell him is somewhat nutso behavior. And this is coming from someone is really okay with a little nutso (because I can be just that). I know this because people tell me this. I do have my own lines in the sand, and some folks lines are a little farther out than others (I get it).
You are entitled to disagree with me thats fine.
I was just putting my voice out there about the 6-7 pages deep of spam. Just in case anyone didnt "notice". We have folks who dont miss a speck on someone around here but miss that?
If you love you spam man then its yours (I wont argue with you) and I can serve it up too if you would like more of it.
It was just that if I could put that many pages on ignore so that they would fall back to where they come from (for me) I would chose that.
Im done though, I dont wish to go back and forth on this.
It was inconsiderate to other brothers and sisters in Christ who are also serving to refute other errors too, whereas you might make a single brothers valiant fight (over a day) much more valuable then others over a baby bottle topic? Copy pasted 60 times? To the point you cant find the other topics?
I started this to get someones attention after that, its not my business now.
I just wanted to make sure I understood spamming, like if there are new rules on it? Do we have new limitations if our stuff is true (and not false)?
Because I have a lot of helpful truths and I would like to spread them around a multitide of times.
A
AgeofKnowledge
Guest
Typically, we just report an offending post with an explanation and it is automatically sent to a moderator.
If it's critical and we need a faster response, we go into chat and private message a moderator directly with the issue after reporting or send them a private message using the message feature in our profile after reporting.
My experience is that when a lot of people start reporting someone, it gets dealt with.
But we're not supposed to start threads on users at CC though so make a note not to do that in the future.
And, understand that I do see your point and am trying to help you learn how to get what you want here within CC's protocol.
Peace and God bless you.
If it's critical and we need a faster response, we go into chat and private message a moderator directly with the issue after reporting or send them a private message using the message feature in our profile after reporting.
My experience is that when a lot of people start reporting someone, it gets dealt with.
But we're not supposed to start threads on users at CC though so make a note not to do that in the future.
And, understand that I do see your point and am trying to help you learn how to get what you want here within CC's protocol.
Peace and God bless you.
Hello Ageofknowledge
It's just that the threads that are newer and active are ran off the first page and after they are off the first page I think they move down faster.