Tonight's Presidential Debate
- Thread starter p_rehbein
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Once again, this is TOTAL LEFTIST BALONEY. SCOTUS was going strictly by the Constitution (which the Leftists hate, and which Biden threw in the trash). "Free to break the law" is just nonsensical, but these people know that their supporters will not dig deeper to seek the truth.
"Justices also probed if the institution of the presidency would be crippled if presidents are subject to criminal prosecution for anything they’ve done in office by anyone who might accuse them of wrongdoing – essentially creating “open season” on a president after leaving office... “Presidents have to make a lot of tough decisions about enforcing the law, and they have to make decisions about questions that are unsettled, and they have to make decisions based on the information that’s available,” he said. “Do you really, did I understand you to say, well, you know, if he makes a mistake, he makes a mistake; he’s subject to the criminal laws just like anybody else?”...
But if there is some type of standard to determine immunity, the usual practice would be to strike the lower court’s opinion and send it back down to the lower court with the test – a remand that undoubtedly would be a victory for Trump’s legal team.
In further good news for Trump, even the three liberal justices seemed open to there being some level of presidential immunity that endures past the term of office. It is possible those justices concur in part with a decision to implement an immunity test while dissenting in part.
SCOTUS Poised to Agree with Trump: Former Presidents Have Some Immunity (breitbart.com)
The Supreme Court did not even address the issue of the WEAPONIZATION of the justice system to "get Trump".
"Justices also probed if the institution of the presidency would be crippled if presidents are subject to criminal prosecution for anything they’ve done in office by anyone who might accuse them of wrongdoing – essentially creating “open season” on a president after leaving office... “Presidents have to make a lot of tough decisions about enforcing the law, and they have to make decisions about questions that are unsettled, and they have to make decisions based on the information that’s available,” he said. “Do you really, did I understand you to say, well, you know, if he makes a mistake, he makes a mistake; he’s subject to the criminal laws just like anybody else?”...
But if there is some type of standard to determine immunity, the usual practice would be to strike the lower court’s opinion and send it back down to the lower court with the test – a remand that undoubtedly would be a victory for Trump’s legal team.
In further good news for Trump, even the three liberal justices seemed open to there being some level of presidential immunity that endures past the term of office. It is possible those justices concur in part with a decision to implement an immunity test while dissenting in part.
SCOTUS Poised to Agree with Trump: Former Presidents Have Some Immunity (breitbart.com)
The Supreme Court did not even address the issue of the WEAPONIZATION of the justice system to "get Trump".
-
1
- Show all
They had kept old Joe in hiding for so long that they felt it was necessary to show the world how smart and articulate he is (under the influence of drugs). But someone missed giving Biden his drug cocktail. In any event, we need to see God's hand in this. Biden is lucky he did not get the treatment which Belshazzar got.
And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this... In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain. And Darius the Median took the kingdom, being about threescore and two years old. (Dan 5:22,30,31)
But it could still happen. Especially when the Leftists are calling for the assassination of Trump with a drone strike.
And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this... In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain. And Darius the Median took the kingdom, being about threescore and two years old. (Dan 5:22,30,31)
But it could still happen. Especially when the Leftists are calling for the assassination of Trump with a drone strike.
-
2
- Show all
and i think this is why the liberal media has been having a melt down the few days.
it is not that they did not know about biden's mental decline, they knew. they are upset that they can no longer hide it, nor is there a way to rebuild the narrative they have built the last couple of years...
it is not that they did not know about biden's mental decline, they knew. they are upset that they can no longer hide it, nor is there a way to rebuild the narrative they have built the last couple of years...
-
2
-
2
-
1
- Show all
The answer is the Congress.
If the Congress deems acts perpetrated by the President is a high crime or misdemeanors, they can impeach him.
The corrupt Democrats "deemed" Trump committed several of these acts, and impeached him twice.
But to avoid EXACTLY the type of purely political impeachments the democrats tried, the brilliant authors of the Constitution said the trial would be held in the Senate, and 2 thirds of them would have to agree to convict.
Obviously they did not convict.
BUT, if a President did commit an act heinous enough, the thinking would be that even members of his own party would agree to convict.
IMO Biden has several times reached that threshold. Maybe more.
Certainly his refusal to secure our border from foreign agents and untold MILLIONS of illegal immigrants warrant impeachment.
Not to mention the treachery he committed in the manner in which we left leaving Afghanistan.
If the Congress deems acts perpetrated by the President is a high crime or misdemeanors, they can impeach him.
The corrupt Democrats "deemed" Trump committed several of these acts, and impeached him twice.
But to avoid EXACTLY the type of purely political impeachments the democrats tried, the brilliant authors of the Constitution said the trial would be held in the Senate, and 2 thirds of them would have to agree to convict.
Obviously they did not convict.
BUT, if a President did commit an act heinous enough, the thinking would be that even members of his own party would agree to convict.
IMO Biden has several times reached that threshold. Maybe more.
Certainly his refusal to secure our border from foreign agents and untold MILLIONS of illegal immigrants warrant impeachment.
Not to mention the treachery he committed in the manner in which we left leaving Afghanistan.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
KJP admits Biden had a bad night, but says it is not uncommon for a person to have a bad night and the Biden campaign has decided that releasing more detailed medical records concerning Biden's cognitive abilities is unwarranted.
She also said that the Biden team understands that the American people were upset by what they saw and that they are not going to take that away from the American people. That was a little confusing but I gather that what she means is they now have the ability to erase our memory and they have decided not to do that just yet.
She also said that they have been fully transparent and I would agree that these comments from her do give us a clear view into the mindset of the Biden administration.
She also said that the Biden team understands that the American people were upset by what they saw and that they are not going to take that away from the American people. That was a little confusing but I gather that what she means is they now have the ability to erase our memory and they have decided not to do that just yet.
She also said that they have been fully transparent and I would agree that these comments from her do give us a clear view into the mindset of the Biden administration.
If the problem is the "corrupt democrats" then we don't have to worry because the Republicans control congress.* 
*I am joking. You don't have to worry because Jesus is Lord
*I am joking. You don't have to worry because Jesus is Lord
If the problem is the "corrupt democrats" then we don't have to worry because the Republicans control congress.*
*I am joking. You don't have to worry because Jesus is Lord
*I am joking. You don't have to worry because Jesus is Lord
They allowed Biden to get an omnibus spending bill, they have increased the debt so that interest on the debt is now the biggest line item on the budget. Congressmen like Jim Jordan and Senators like Rand Paul are powerless to get information about the NIH, and Merrick Garland because Congress has not frozen their budgets so they ignore them.
If the house is controlled by the Republicans why are they acting like it is controlled by the Democrats?
If the house is controlled by the Republicans why are they acting like it is controlled by the Democrats?