D
okay, that's true, there are a few folks who seem to deliberately provoke arguments about christian issues. i notice that most of them hang around the bible discussion forum and eventually reveal their intention.
the problem is, i have also noticed a trend that as soon as someone enters ANY thread (and since i mostly stay in the singles forum, that is where i mostly observe these exchanges) and tosses out any idea that is contrary to beliefs generally held by most evangelical christians, other posters will resort to calling them a troll.
yesterday someone stated a single line about their "unpopular" opinion, albeit, in a very non-threatening way. another poster called him out, and proclaimed him a troll, going as far to looking in his previous posts, listing his previously participated threads and deciding that he was a "troublemaker". then two more regulars joined in the troll-proclaiming and mocking. after he was called a "punk" and a "troll" along with a few unwelcoming remarks, the "so-called" troll apologized for having a different belief, but then said he was indeed a christian and wondered why he was being ganged up on.
i think a lot of people throw out the word "troll" just because they see something they don't agree with or view as "trouble". if someone is simply stating their dissenting beliefs, they aren't being a troll--they are simply in disagreement. it's unreasonable for us to assume that all christians (christ-seekers) are going to agree with us, or to think we can confidently identify the intentions, information or "backstory" each person is operating under/with.
you only become a "troll" in my book when you are actively attacking, name calling, causing disruption or not following the terms of service here on cc.
oh, and my pet peeve? people who talk about the OP as if they aren't there, discussing someone like they're an outsider who is unwelcome, and okay to mock.
i was pretty disgusted by a thread within the last couple weeks where a poster who was from another country was seeking love and posted something quite unusual. several posters took to mocking and teasing the poster (and the subject matter) as if the OP couldn't read what was was being posting and their feelings weren't worthy of consideration.
i would like to think of this as a place that should be welcoming. and what kind of host or hostess makes fun of a guest while they are sitting in your living room?
let's not forget that Christs' own warning--the manner by which the world would identify us as christians by the manner in which we show love for one another (john 13:35).
So what you're saying is that after he was reported and the administrators looked into the situation and made the decision to ban him, you're in disagreement with their wisdom to do so? Because the rules state that we are to abide by the administrators call on these situations.
I have more than once corresponded with the site admins about my own behavior toward some of the questionable users and asked for their insight on the matter. I hold myself accountable to them because they are the owners of this site and I respect whatever decision they make. More times than not, the people I've reported have been investigated and found to be stirring up trouble. I, too want to nurture and encourage users who are seeking God's truth.
let's not forget that Christs' own warning--the manner by which the world would identify us as christians by the manner in which we show love for one another (john 13:35).
there is nothing in my post regarding banned people, or even discussing a banned person.i have no desire to debate decisions about banning or otherwise. i'm confused how you construed that from my previous post. : )So what you're saying is that after he was reported and the administrators looked into the situation and made the decision to ban him, you're in disagreement with their wisdom to do so? Because the rules state that we are to abide by the administrators call on these situations.
I have more than once corresponded with the site admins about my own behavior toward some of the questionable users and asked for their insight on the matter. I hold myself accountable to them because they are the owners of this site and I respect whatever decision they make. More times than not, the people I've reported have been investigated and found to be stirring up trouble. I, too want to nurture and encourage users who are seeking God's truth.
I have been doing research and development for over 25 years and am quite qualified to find information online about a person within minutes. When I see that a new CC user is on several other sites wreaking havoc, I pretty much believe they're here to do the same thing. Nevertheless, I will give them the benefit of the doubt until I see them sparking the same controversy on CC as they do elsewhere.
It's very Christ-like of you to be concerned for them, as am I. But by the same token, someone has to be looking out for the wolves who sneak in to corrupt the site. So there needs to be a balance here. As I said, I make it a habit of reporting my own suspicions AND my own behavior to the CC site admins for their insight and wisdom on a matter.
And once the site administrator has made the call to ban a legit troublemaker, that should be the end of it. We're advised not to debate about it once that matter is resolved. That's one of the rules of this site in order to keep the peace in these matters.
...presenting a poor example of Christ for the whole world to see (since these forums are publicly accessible and google searchable the whole world really can watch...).
you refer twice to my beautiful sister as a watchdog? An animal? After you give us your heartfelt novels of how we should be kind to one another in Christ?....? Oh please explain...for I'm sure because I express my opinion...you will kindly in Christ call me a Rottweiler?.... Oh boy oh boy....how I anticipate your next novel on me!there is nothing in my post regarding banned people, or even discussing a banned person.i have no desire to debate decisions about banning or otherwise. i'm confused how you construed that from my previous post. : )
instead, i am simply trying to add to this worthy discussion topic: how do we treat people who are perceived "trolls"?
in the example of what i referenced earlier--i am concerned about is the manner in which he was engaged by, and the detrimental effect that it had on the interactions that followed, including potential lost opportunity.
i appreciate your intentions to want to play "watchdog" for the website. the problem is, i am concerned that in your effort and desire to fulfill that role you are making assessments about people that very much color your actions, as well as the tone/attitude in your words.
then, because of the original comment made and the dialogue it initiated, two additional members joined in the effort to attack this newer member.
while you may feel especially qualified to identify and approach troublemakers with the intention of determining their motives, i don't think it's a good idea for you to try to engage with them for the purpose of ascertaining whether you think they're "legit" or not.
based upon what i observed and what you shared, if you're approaching someone with that attitude of suspicion it's quite likely going to read to others (including that poster) with a "you're not welcome here" undertone, and probably less thinly-veiled that you intend. think of all the people who read that exchange who are new, such as Christ-seekers and those searching for information about the christian lifestyle. people who read that and draw their own negative conclusions, because the words we share, and the actions we take are seen by and affect more than just the person we're responding to.
anyway, i really do appreciate your desire to help the site out by identifying suspicious people. but can't you simply report them to the admins, instead of engaging them? you say that "someone" has to watch out for "wolves" but there is a big difference between identifying who you deem suspicious and reporting them, vs. engaging with them in a brash manner and calling them a troll along with your reporting of them.
further, it gives one the impression that your being a "watchdog" is more important that the people who come here, and that doesn't seem right.
besides, i think it's especially important not to underestimate the power of God's Word and the Holy Spirit to reach, speak to, and/or convict someone, regardless of their initial intentions. i am reminded of a verse in genesis 50:20:
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result...
in spite of what things appear to be, God can use any circumstance to accomplish His purpose. and whenever possible, we should seek to be in cooperation of His intentions and supporting any opportunities that come our way.
finally, it was never my intention for you to be identified in the example used in my earlier post, which is why i avoided using any names. instead, my focus/intention was to simply raise it as a recent opportunity to evaluate what we are doing as members, and perhaps how we can better leverage the opportunities we are given to reach out, engage and support those who come to CC for the intention of seeking info. as such, it was not my desire to make you feel picked on, as i do believe your intentions are well-meaning. : )
That's a great point.
Let's talk about that.
1. People who come here ONLY with the intention of disrupting the forum are NOT Christians.
They aren't our brothers.
2. We show love to our TRUE brothers and sisters in Christ by REMOVING these people.
If someone comes into my home and wants to humiliate my friends...
I show love to my friends by asking that person to leave.
This isn't rocket science.
Here's is the verse in question, john 13:35
John 13:35
By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
When we let someone mock and ridicule our brothers, we are actually VIOLATING this verse.
you refer twice to my beautiful sister as a watchdog? An animal? After you give us your heartfelt novels of how we should be kind to one another in Christ?....? Oh please explain...for I'm sure because I express my opinion...you will kindly in Christ call me a Rottweiler?.... Oh boy oh boy....how I anticipate your next novel on me!
It seems very clear that gypsy is referring to the role of watchdog rather than calling anyone any names. It's a common enough expression. She even used quotation marks.
you're putting words in my mouth. i am afraid that you and i are talking about very different "troll scenarios". what you described earlier is someone who is anti-christian with an agenda. i am not talking about them.
.